Last reviewed · How we verify
The Effects of Two Different Treatment Protocols on Shoulder Function, Quality of Life, and Ultrasound Parameters in Patients With Frozen Shoulder
The goal of this interventional study is to compare the outcomes of two different injection aprroaches in patients with frozen shoulder. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Is hydrodilatation better than intraarticular corticosteroid injection? * Is there any prognostic factors that will help clinicians guide their decision making when choosing between these two treatments? Participans will receive an injection(cortcosteroid and local anesthetics alone or with hydrodilatation-corticosteroid and local anesthetics plus sterile saline solution) and then they will follow a rehabilitation program.
Details
| Lead sponsor | Istanbul University |
|---|---|
| Phase | NA |
| Status | UNKNOWN |
| Enrolment | 50 |
| Start date | 2023-10-01 |
| Completion | 2024-03 |
Conditions
- Frozen Shoulder
- Shoulder Capsulitis
- Shoulder Pain
Interventions
- Intra-articular corticosteroid injection
- Ultrasound Guided Hydrodilatation with corticosteroid injection
Primary outcomes
- Change from baseline pain score on Visual Analog Scale(VAS) — Baseline, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months
Pain scored according to VAS; between 0(no pain) to 10(worst pain) - Change in Shoulder Pain and Disability Index(SPADI) scores — Baseline, 1 month, 3 months
Scored between 0-10 ; 0 means no pain and disability and 10 means the worst pain and disability