Last reviewed · How we verify
The Anesthetic Efficacy of Articaine as Buccal Injection Compared to Lidocaine Baccual and Palatal Injection for Maxillary Premolar Teeth Extraction A Randomized, Single-Blinded, Clinical Trial.
This study Is designed as a prospective randomized, single-blinded clinical trial. To evaluate The anesthetic efficacy of articaine as a buccal Injection for maxillary premolar teeth extraction, compared to lidocaine as a buccal and palatal injection.
Details
| Lead sponsor | University of Baghdad |
|---|---|
| Phase | NA |
| Status | UNKNOWN |
| Enrolment | 200 |
| Start date | 2022-01-05 |
| Completion | 2023-09 |
Conditions
- Anesthesia, Local
Interventions
- Maxillary extraction without palatal injection
- Maxillary extraction with buccal and palatal injection
Primary outcomes
- Pain during Extraction — Assessment of pain in the period during which the extraction has been made and up to 5 minutes after extraction of the tooth.
In the current study the pain during extraction was assessed by using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS 0-10 cm ) one of the most commonly used self-reporting measures of pain, it measures a characteristic that is believed to range across a continuum of values range from (0 no pain) to the end (10 un bearable pain) which is not easy to measure directly .
Countries
Iraq