Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT05907174

Siyakhana Peer: Evaluating a Peer Recovery Coach Model to Reduce Substance Use Stigma in South African HIV Care

Completed NA Results posted Last updated 10 February 2025
What this trial tests

NA trial testing Siyakhana - P in Substance-Related Disorders in 91 participants. Completed in 29 August 2024.

Timeline
22 February 2021
Primary endpoint
29 January 2024
29 August 2024

Quick facts

Lead sponsorUniversity of Maryland, College Park
PhaseNA
StatusCompleted
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designparallel
Maskingnone
Primary purposehealth services research
Enrollment91
Start date22 February 2021
Primary completion29 January 2024
Estimated completion29 August 2024
Sites1 location across South Africa

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

University of Maryland, College Park

Who can join

18 and older, any sex, with Substance-Related Disorders or Substance Use. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.

Healthcare Worker Substance Use Stigma Primary · 3-months post-baseline assessment

Healthcare worker stigma towards substance use measured using the Social Distance Scale (SDS). SDS scores range from 6 to 24, with higher scores indicating more desired social distance (higher stigma).

GroupValue95% CI
Enhanced Treatment as Usual (Healthcare Workers)11.63± 2.87
Siyakhana - P (Healthcare Workers)9.95± 2.93
Healthcare Worker Feasibility (Intervention Arm Only) Secondary · 6-months post-integration assessment

Feasibility subscale of the JHU Applied Mental Health Research (AMHR) D\&I Measure, a 10-item measure for assessing dissemination and implementation outcomes in low- and middle-income settings, completed by healthcare worker participants. Items are rated on a 0-3 scale, and averaged, with lower scores (closer to 0) indicating lower feasibility and higher scores (closer to 3) indicating higher feasibility. Findings will be supplemented with qualitative interviews.

GroupValue95% CI
Siyakhana - P (Healthcare Workers)2.35± 0.63
Healthcare Worker Acceptability (Intervention Arm Only) Secondary · 6-months post-integration assessment

Acceptability subscale of the JHU Applied Mental Health Research (AMHR) D\&I Measure, a 14-item measure for assessing dissemination and implementation outcomes in low- and middle-income settings, completed by healthcare worker participants. Items are rated on a 0-3 scale, and averaged, with lower scores (closer to 0) indicating lower acceptability and higher scores (closer to 3) indicating higher acceptability. Findings will be supplemented with qualitative interviews.

GroupValue95% CI
Siyakhana - P (Healthcare Workers)2.46± 0.58
Patient Feasibility (Intervention Arm Only) Secondary · 3-months post-baseline assessment

Feasibility subscale of the JHU Applied Mental Health Research (AMHR) D\&I Measure, a 14-item measure for assessing dissemination and implementation outcomes in low- and middle-income settings, completed by patient participants. Items are rated on a 0-3 scale, and averaged, with lower scores (closer to 0) indicating lower feasibility and higher scores (closer to 3) indicating higher feasibility. Findings will be supplemented with qualitative interviews.

GroupValue95% CI
Siyakhana - P (Patients)2.77± 0.24
Patient Acceptability (Intervention Arm Only) Secondary · 3-months post-baseline assessment

Acceptability subscale of the JHU Applied Mental Health Research (AMHR) D\&I Measure, a 12-item measure for assessing dissemination and implementation outcomes in low- and middle-income settings, completed by patient participants. Items are rated on a 0-3 scale, and averaged, with lower scores (closer to 0) indicating lower acceptability and higher scores (closer to 3) indicating higher acceptability. Findings will be supplemented with qualitative interviews.

GroupValue95% CI
Siyakhana - P (Patients)2.86± 0.28

Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Time frame: Adverse events are monitored an average of 15 months for each participant, from signing of informed consent to the final follow-up.. Reporting threshold: 0%. Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.

Enhanced Treatment as Usual (Healthcare Workers)
Serious: 0/20 (0%)
Deaths: 0/20
Siyakhana - P (Healthcare Workers)
Serious: 1/21 (5%)
Deaths: 1/21
Enhanced Treatment as Usual (Patients)
Serious: 4/25 (16%)
Deaths: 3/25
Siyakhana - P (Patients)
Serious: 0/25 (0%)
Deaths: 0/25

Serious adverse events (2 terms)

ReactionSystemEnhanced Treatment as Usua…Siyakhana - P (Healthcare …Enhanced Treatment as Usua…Siyakhana - P (Patients)
DeathGeneral disorders
HospitalizationRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Other adverse events (2 terms — click to expand)

ReactionSystemEnhanced Treatment as Usua…Siyakhana - P (Healthcare …Enhanced Treatment as Usua…Siyakhana - P (Patients)
Birth in hospital, infant deathPregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions
Suicidal ThoughtsPsychiatric disorders

Most-reported serious reactions: Death, Hospitalization.

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05907174 adverse events section.

Sponsor's own description

Alcohol and other drug use is common among people living with HIV in South Africa and is associated with worse engagement in HIV care. There is evidence that healthcare workers in this setting, including community health workers who play a central role in re-engaging patients back into HIV care, exhibit stigmatizing behaviors towards HIV patients who use substances. In general, healthcare worker stigma towards alcohol and other drug use is associated with poorer treatment of patients who use substances, and in this setting, healthcare worker stigma towards alcohol and other drug use has been associated with worse patient engagement in HIV care. In the United States, peer recovery coaches (PRCs), who are trained individuals with lived substance use recovery experience, have helped patients who use substances engage in healthcare. Theoretically, integrating a PRC onto a healthcare team also increases healthcare worker contact with a person with substance use experience, which may be associated with lower stigma. Yet, a PRC model has not yet been tested in South African HIV care. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to develop and pilot a PRC model integrated into community-based primary care teams providing HIV services in South Africa. The study aims to compare a healthcare team with a PRC to a team without a PRC. The investigators will primarily assess the implementation of this PRC model and rates of patient re-engagement in care.

Publications & conference data

2 peer-reviewed publications reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):

  1. A stakeholder-driven approach to designing a peer recovery coach role for implementation in community-oriented primary care teams in South Africa.
    Myers B, Regenauer KS, Johnson K, Brown I, et al · · 2025 · cited 2× · PMID 39948609 · DOI 10.1186/s13722-025-00544-3
  2. A stakeholder-driven approach to designing a peer recovery coach role for implementation in community-oriented primary care teams in South Africa
    Myers B, Regenauer KS, Johnson K, Brown I, et al · · 2024 · DOI 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4566640/v1

Verify or expand the search:

Other recruiting trials for Substance-Related Disorders

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other University of Maryland, College Park trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT05907174.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing