Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT05859503

A Comparison Study of the Perclose Proglide (TM) SMC System Versus Figure-of-8- Suture Technique for Closure of Large-bore Femoral Venous Access.

Status unknown Last updated 17 May 2023
What this trial tests

trial testing Closure Strategy with Perclose-Proglide system in Cardiovascular Diseases in 200 participants. Status unknown.

Timeline
16 May 2023
Primary endpoint
1 September 2023
1 September 2023

Quick facts

Lead sponsorHospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron Research Institute
StatusStatus unknown
Study typeOBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment200
Start date16 May 2023
Primary completion1 September 2023
Estimated completion1 September 2023
Sites1 location across Spain

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron Research Institute

Who can join

18 and older, any sex, with Cardiovascular Diseases. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Sponsor's own description

This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of two strategies for closing large caliber venous access in patients undergoing percutaneous procedures: compression with figure-of-8 suture versus closure with the Perclose-Proglide system.

Publications & conference data

No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial.

Verify or expand the search:

Other recruiting trials for Cardiovascular Diseases

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron Research Institute trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT05859503.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing