Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT05848674: CABIN

CArdiac Brief INtervention: A Feasibility Study to Promote Engagement With Cardiac Rehabilitation

Completed NA Results posted Last updated 3 March 2026
What this trial tests

NA trial testing CArdiac Brief INtervention (CABIN) in ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction in 40 participants. Completed in 1 November 2024.

Timeline
1 February 2024
Primary endpoint
1 November 2024
1 November 2024

Quick facts

Lead sponsorQueen's University, Belfast
PhaseNA
StatusCompleted
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designparallel
Maskingnone
Primary purposesupportive care
Enrollment40
Start date1 February 2024
Primary completion1 November 2024
Estimated completion1 November 2024
Sites2 locations across United Kingdom

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Queen's University, Belfast

Who can join

18 and older, any sex, with ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.

The Percentage of Eligible Patients Who Agreed to Participate in the Study. Primary · Month 3

The measurement of recruitment rate will allow the efficiency of the recruitment strategy to be assessed, with this information enabling the identification of potential issues and informing the required duration of the recruitment period for a larger study.

GroupValue95% CI
Recruitment Rate40
The Percentage of Intervention Delivered (Dose) Primary · Week 1

Dose will represent the percentage of the intervention (completeness) received by participants, which will inform the feasibility of CABIN implementation. This information will be collected via an intervention checklist that is completed by the Research Assistant following each intervention session.

GroupValue95% CI
Intervention Group100± 0
The Percentage of Recruited Participants Providing Data for Each Baseline and Outcome Measure. Primary · Month 9

The completeness of baseline and outcome measures will be determined as missing data may jeopardise the power of a future study. The Research Fellow will record details about data collection in the study log, which will highlight any problems or required changes to improve data collection for a future study.

GroupValue95% CI
Intervention Group17
Control Group18
Perspectives of Patients on Research Design and Intervention Delivery. Primary · Week 14

Participants will be invited to a semi-structured interview upon study completion to discuss: 1. Acceptability of intervention (i.e., issues for development, required corrections, additional areas for inclusion, aspects enjoyed by participants, and barriers and facilitators to participation). 2. Context (i.e., factors influencing study / intervention delivery and functioning, for instance, time and resources). 3. Possible mechanisms of impact (i.e., exploring how intervention activities may trigger change for participants).

GroupValue95% CI
Intervention Group10
Control Group10
Intervention Group2
Control Group2
Intervention Group2
Control Group3
Perspectives of Clinical Staff on Research Design and Intervention Delivery. Primary · Week 14

Coronary care unit and cardiac rehabilitation staff will be invited to focus groups to discuss: 1. Acceptability of intervention (i.e., issues for development, required corrections, additional areas for inclusion, aspects enjoyed by participants, and barriers and facilitators to participation). 2. Context (i.e., factors influencing study / intervention delivery and functioning, for instance, time and resources). 3. Possible mechanisms of impact (i.e., exploring how intervention activities may trigger change for participants).

GroupValue95% CI
Clinical Staff3
Clinical Staff3
Clinical Staff2
Total Score in Coronary Artery Disease Education Questionnaire, Short Version (CADE-Q SV) Secondary · Baseline, Week 1 (Post-Intervention), Week 4, and Week 14.

Coronary Artery Disease Education Questionnaire, Short Version (CADE-Q SV) evaluates patients' knowledge of coronary artery disease and core components of cardiac rehabilitation. Total scores will be reported as the number of 20 questions answered correctly. A higher total score represents greater knowledge of coronary artery disease and core components of cardiac rehabilitation.

Baseline
GroupValue95% CI
Intervention Group13.1± 2.3
Control Group12.0± 2.7
Week 1 (Post-Intervention)
GroupValue95% CI
Intervention Group15.0± 2.2
Control Group12.0± 2.7
Week 4
GroupValue95% CI
Intervention Group15.7± 2.0
Control Group13.5± 2.9
Week 14
GroupValue95% CI
Intervention Group17.1± 1.2
Control Group12.7± 3.6
Total Score in Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire Secondary · Baseline, Week 1 (Post-Intervention), Week 4, and Week 14.

Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire rapidly assesses the cognitive and emotional representations of illness. Total scores will be reported across a range from 0 - 80, with higher scores reflecting worse illness perception and lower scores indicating a more optimistic view of the disease.

Baseline
GroupValue95% CI
Intervention Group15.0± 9.5
Control Group21.7± 10.6
Week 1 (Post-Intervention)
GroupValue95% CI
Intervention Group8.6± 8.2
Control Group21.7± 10.6
Week 4
GroupValue95% CI
Intervention Group7.2± 6.3
Control Group13.2± 8.5
Total Score in the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Secondary · Baseline, Week 4, and Week 14.

The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale measures states of depression and anxiety. Total scores will be reported across a range from 0 - 42, with higher scores representing greater levels of anxiety and depression.

Baseline
GroupValue95% CI
Intervention Group21.9± 6.5
Control Group23.3± 6.1
Week 4
GroupValue95% CI
Intervention Group14.3± 4.4
Control Group20.0± 8.1
Week 14
GroupValue95% CI
Intervention Group6.7± 4.3
Control Group20.6± 7.1
Total Score in Personal Wellbeing Score Secondary · Baseline, Week 4, and Week 14.

Personal Wellbeing Score measures health status and health confidence. Total scores are reported across a range from 0 - 12, with a higher score indicating greater wellbeing.

Baseline
GroupValue95% CI
Intervention Group5.9± 2.2
Control Group4.7± 1.7
Week 4
GroupValue95% CI
Intervention Group7.9± 1.9
Control Group5.7± 2.5
Week 14
GroupValue95% CI
Intervention Group9.1± 2.0
Control Group5.7± 2.5
Number of Cardiac Rehabilitation Sessions Attended. Secondary · Week 14.

Number of cardiac rehabilitation sessions attended (of 8 in total)

GroupValue95% CI
Intervention Group7.5± 1.2
Control Group6.9± 1.6

Sponsor's own description

Background: An ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is a specific type of heart attack. In a previous study, patients requested more mental and emotional support after a STEMI. To provide this support, the research team worked with hospital staff and patients to create a brief intervention called CABIN (CArdiac Brief INtervention), which involves a short discussion between a patient and a nurse, along with a leaflet that summarises the information discussed. Aim: To test if the plan for giving CABIN to patients after a STEMI is suitable, and to explore what impact the intervention may have on mental and emotional well-being, along with knowledge about their condition. Methods: Forty patients who had a STEMI will be recruited from two hospital centres in Northern Ireland (Royal Victoria Hospital and Ulster Hospital). Participants will be randomly put in a group who receive the full CABIN intervention or a group who receive a shortened version of CABIN. Both groups will receive their respective interventions before leaving the hospital, which will take about twenty minutes. Participants will be asked to complete brief questionnaires before the intervention, after the intervention, 3-4 weeks from diagnosis, and 14 weeks from diagnosis. At the end of the study, patients who took part and staff from the hospitals will be asked to complete an exit interview (patients) or a focus group (staff), which will provide information about their experience of the study / intervention and changes required. Outcome of Study: If the study is suitable for patients and appropriate for staff to deliver, the research team will examine the effectiveness of CABIN in a larger study, which may lead to the intervention being used in clinical practice to improve cardiac rehabilitation uptake and outcomes for patients after a STEMI.

Publications & conference data

1 peer-reviewed publication reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):

  1. The feasibility of delivering cardiac brief intervention to patients following ST-elevation myocardial infarction: Protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial.
    Thompson G, Caughers G, Bradley J, Donnelly P, et al · · 2024 · PMID 38954674 · DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0306406

Verify or expand the search:

Other recruiting trials for ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other Queen's University, Belfast trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT05848674.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing