18 and older, any sex, with ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
The Percentage of Eligible Patients Who Agreed to Participate in the Study.Primary· Month 3
The measurement of recruitment rate will allow the efficiency of the recruitment strategy to be assessed, with this information enabling the identification of potential issues and informing the required duration of the recruitment period for a larger study.
Group
Value
95% CI
Recruitment Rate
40
The Percentage of Intervention Delivered (Dose)Primary· Week 1
Dose will represent the percentage of the intervention (completeness) received by participants, which will inform the feasibility of CABIN implementation. This information will be collected via an intervention checklist that is completed by the Research Assistant following each intervention session.
Group
Value
95% CI
Intervention Group
100
± 0
The Percentage of Recruited Participants Providing Data for Each Baseline and Outcome Measure.Primary· Month 9
The completeness of baseline and outcome measures will be determined as missing data may jeopardise the power of a future study. The Research Fellow will record details about data collection in the study log, which will highlight any problems or required changes to improve data collection for a future study.
Group
Value
95% CI
Intervention Group
17
Control Group
18
Perspectives of Patients on Research Design and Intervention Delivery.Primary· Week 14
Participants will be invited to a semi-structured interview upon study completion to discuss:
1. Acceptability of intervention (i.e., issues for development, required corrections, additional areas for inclusion, aspects enjoyed by participants, and barriers and facilitators to participation).
2. Context (i.e., factors influencing study / intervention delivery and functioning, for instance, time and resources).
3. Possible mechanisms of impact (i.e., exploring how intervention activities may trigger change for participants).
Group
Value
95% CI
Intervention Group
10
Control Group
10
Intervention Group
2
Control Group
2
Intervention Group
2
Control Group
3
Perspectives of Clinical Staff on Research Design and Intervention Delivery.Primary· Week 14
Coronary care unit and cardiac rehabilitation staff will be invited to focus groups to discuss:
1. Acceptability of intervention (i.e., issues for development, required corrections, additional areas for inclusion, aspects enjoyed by participants, and barriers and facilitators to participation).
2. Context (i.e., factors influencing study / intervention delivery and functioning, for instance, time and resources).
3. Possible mechanisms of impact (i.e., exploring how intervention activities may trigger change for participants).
Group
Value
95% CI
Clinical Staff
3
Clinical Staff
3
Clinical Staff
2
Total Score in Coronary Artery Disease Education Questionnaire, Short Version (CADE-Q SV)Secondary· Baseline, Week 1 (Post-Intervention), Week 4, and Week 14.
Coronary Artery Disease Education Questionnaire, Short Version (CADE-Q SV) evaluates patients' knowledge of coronary artery disease and core components of cardiac rehabilitation. Total scores will be reported as the number of 20 questions answered correctly. A higher total score represents greater knowledge of coronary artery disease and core components of cardiac rehabilitation.
Baseline
Group
Value
95% CI
Intervention Group
13.1
± 2.3
Control Group
12.0
± 2.7
Week 1 (Post-Intervention)
Group
Value
95% CI
Intervention Group
15.0
± 2.2
Control Group
12.0
± 2.7
Week 4
Group
Value
95% CI
Intervention Group
15.7
± 2.0
Control Group
13.5
± 2.9
Week 14
Group
Value
95% CI
Intervention Group
17.1
± 1.2
Control Group
12.7
± 3.6
Total Score in Brief Illness Perception QuestionnaireSecondary· Baseline, Week 1 (Post-Intervention), Week 4, and Week 14.
Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire rapidly assesses the cognitive and emotional representations of illness. Total scores will be reported across a range from 0 - 80, with higher scores reflecting worse illness perception and lower scores indicating a more optimistic view of the disease.
Baseline
Group
Value
95% CI
Intervention Group
15.0
± 9.5
Control Group
21.7
± 10.6
Week 1 (Post-Intervention)
Group
Value
95% CI
Intervention Group
8.6
± 8.2
Control Group
21.7
± 10.6
Week 4
Group
Value
95% CI
Intervention Group
7.2
± 6.3
Control Group
13.2
± 8.5
Total Score in the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale.Secondary· Baseline, Week 4, and Week 14.
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale measures states of depression and anxiety. Total scores will be reported across a range from 0 - 42, with higher scores representing greater levels of anxiety and depression.
Baseline
Group
Value
95% CI
Intervention Group
21.9
± 6.5
Control Group
23.3
± 6.1
Week 4
Group
Value
95% CI
Intervention Group
14.3
± 4.4
Control Group
20.0
± 8.1
Week 14
Group
Value
95% CI
Intervention Group
6.7
± 4.3
Control Group
20.6
± 7.1
Total Score in Personal Wellbeing ScoreSecondary· Baseline, Week 4, and Week 14.
Personal Wellbeing Score measures health status and health confidence. Total scores are reported across a range from 0 - 12, with a higher score indicating greater wellbeing.
Baseline
Group
Value
95% CI
Intervention Group
5.9
± 2.2
Control Group
4.7
± 1.7
Week 4
Group
Value
95% CI
Intervention Group
7.9
± 1.9
Control Group
5.7
± 2.5
Week 14
Group
Value
95% CI
Intervention Group
9.1
± 2.0
Control Group
5.7
± 2.5
Number of Cardiac Rehabilitation Sessions Attended.Secondary· Week 14.
Number of cardiac rehabilitation sessions attended (of 8 in total)
Group
Value
95% CI
Intervention Group
7.5
± 1.2
Control Group
6.9
± 1.6
Sponsor's own description
Background:
An ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is a specific type of heart attack. In a previous study, patients requested more mental and emotional support after a STEMI. To provide this support, the research team worked with hospital staff and patients to create a brief intervention called CABIN (CArdiac Brief INtervention), which involves a short discussion between a patient and a nurse, along with a leaflet that summarises the information discussed.
Aim:
To test if the plan for giving CABIN to patients after a STEMI is suitable, and to explore what impact the intervention may have on mental and emotional well-being, along with knowledge about their condition.
Methods:
Forty patients who had a STEMI will be recruited from two hospital centres in Northern Ireland (Royal Victoria Hospital and Ulster Hospital). Participants will be randomly put in a group who receive the full CABIN intervention or a group who receive a shortened version of CABIN. Both groups will receive their respective interventions before leaving the hospital, which will take about twenty minutes. Participants will be asked to complete brief questionnaires before the intervention, after the intervention, 3-4 weeks from diagnosis, and 14 weeks from diagnosis. At the end of the study, patients who took part and staff from the hospitals will be asked to complete an exit interview (patients) or a focus group (staff), which will provide information about their experience of the study / intervention and changes required.
Outcome of Study:
If the study is suitable for patients and appropriate for staff to deliver, the research team will examine the effectiveness of CABIN in a larger study, which may lead to the intervention being used in clinical practice to improve cardiac rehabilitation uptake and outcomes for patients after a STEMI.
Publications & conference data
1 peer-reviewed publication reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):
Other recruiting trials for ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Currently open trials in the same condition.
NCT05785897 — STEMI Treated With a Polymer-free Sirolimus-coated Stent and P2Y12 Inhibitor-based SAPT Versus Conventional DAPT
· NA
· recruiting
NCT06795035 — Assessment of Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction After STEMI Using Continuous Saline Thermodilution
· recruiting
NCT07058857 — The Effect of Low-Level Tragus Stimulation on Echocardiographic Parameters in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocard
· NA
· recruiting
NCT06465303 — A Study of RTP-026 to Assess Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy in Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEM
· Phase 2
· recruiting
NCT06535503 — Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes Among STEMI Patients With Cardiogenic Shock at Abu Dhabi City
· recruiting
Other Queen's University, Belfast trials
Trials by the same sponsor.
NCT07373041 — Heart Failure Carer Support Programme: Implementation Testing in the UK.
· NA
· not yet recruiting
NCT07482839 — Feasibility Study of a Compassionate Mindful Resilience (CMR) Intervention to Improve Mental Health Well-being Outcomes
· NA
· not yet recruiting
NCT07333924 — Randomised Study Within a Review (SWAR) to Compare Communication of the Findings of Systematic Reviews to the Public by
· Phase 3
· completed
NCT06896799 — Determining the Effect of Food Ordering on Blood Glucose In Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (DEFI-GDM)
· NA
· recruiting
NCT06749327 — Dissecting the Roles of High-quality Diets and Ultra Processed Foods on Cardiometabolic Health
· NA
· not yet recruiting
Publications: Europe PMC API search by NCT ID, retrieved 10 June 2026
Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by Queen's University, Belfast
Last refreshed: 3 March 2026
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT05848674.