Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT05812495

Minimally Invasive Intrathoracic Esophagogastric Side to Side Anastomosis vs. End to Side Anastomosis

Status unknown NA Last updated 13 April 2023
What this trial tests

NA trial testing Esophagogastric Side to Side Anastomosis in Epiphora Due to Insufficient Drainage, Left Side in 402 participants. Status unknown.

Timeline
1 March 2023
Primary endpoint
31 December 2024
31 December 2024

Quick facts

Lead sponsorTianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital
PhaseNA
StatusStatus unknown
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designparallel
Maskingnone
Primary purposetreatment
Enrollment402
Start date1 March 2023
Primary completion31 December 2024
Estimated completion31 December 2024
Sites1 location across China

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital

Who can join

Adults 18 to 75, any sex, with Epiphora Due to Insufficient Drainage, Left Side or Epiphora Due to Insufficient Drainage, Right Side. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Sponsor's own description

On the basis of minimally invasive Ivor Lewis operation for the treatment of lower thoracic esophageal cancer or esophageal gastric junction cancer, the purpose of this study is to compare the probability of anastomotic leakage and stenosis after esophagogastric side to side anastomosis and esophagogastric end to side anastomosis, combined with the probability of complications, quality of life and survival rate of patients after the two anastomotic methods, To explore which anastomotic method is better than the worse for patients with lower thoracic esophageal cancer or cancer at the junction of esophagus and stomach. This study explored a minimally invasive anastomotic method with lower incidence of complications and higher quality of life for patients during Ivor Lewis surgery, which can increase the clinical benefits of patients, improve the quality of life, and extend the survival period, and has important clinical value.

Publications & conference data

No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial.

Verify or expand the search:

Other Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT05812495.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing