Last reviewed · How we verify
NCT05777395
Comparison of Maitland Oscillatory Mobilizations With Kaltenborn Sustained Stretch Mobilizations in Cervicogenic Headache Patients
NA trial testing Maitland Oscillatory Mobilization in Cervicogenic Headache in 26 participants. Status unknown.
15 June 2023
Quick facts
| Lead sponsor | Foundation University Islamabad |
|---|---|
| Phase | NA |
| Status | Status unknown |
| Study type | INTERVENTIONAL |
| Allocation | randomized |
| Design | parallel |
| Masking | single |
| Primary purpose | treatment |
| Enrollment | 26 |
| Start date | 1 January 2023 |
| Primary completion | 15 June 2023 |
| Estimated completion | 1 July 2023 |
| Sites | 1 location across Pakistan |
Drugs / interventions tested
- Maitland Oscillatory Mobilization
- Kaltenborn Sustained Stretch Mobilization
- Conventional therapy — full drug profile →
Conditions studied
- Cervicogenic Headache — all drugs for Cervicogenic Headache →
Sponsor
Foundation University Islamabad
Who can join
Adults 18 to 45, any sex, with Cervicogenic Headache. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Sponsor's own description
Cervicogenic headache is a common headache that causes disability and affects everyday activities. Headache related disorders are the second most common reason for years lived with disability all over the world. According to the latest International Headache Society model, cervicogenicheadache (CGH) is a secondary headache having C1-C2 dysfunction. There is marked limitation in cervical ROM specially rotation. Treatment indicated involves use of electrotherapy and thermal modalities. In addition, use of different manual therapy techniques are advocated to eliminate the root cause i.e. C1-C2 dysfunction. Maitland mobilizations for cervical spine have been found to be effective in treating CGH patients. Maitland mobilizations uses oscillatory mobilizations and has four grades. Kaltenborn, on the other hand, applies sustained stretches and has 3 grades.So, the study will be focusing on comparing the effectiveness of these two mobilizations on cervicogenic headache patients.
Publications & conference data
No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial.
Verify or expand the search:
- PubMed search for NCT05777395
- Europe PMC full search
- ASCO Meeting Library
- ESMO Meeting Library
- bioRxiv preprints
- medRxiv preprints
- Google Scholar
Related trials
Other recruiting trials for Cervicogenic Headache
Currently open trials in the same condition.
- NCT07526025 — Comparative Effects Of Eye-Cervical Re-Education Exercises And Pressure Biofeedback Training Of Deep Cervical Flexors In · NA · recruiting
- NCT07366060 — Effectiveness of Third Occipital Nerve Pulsed Radiofrequency in Cervicogenic Headache · NA · recruiting
- NCT07354776 — Effect of Isometric Neck Exercises on Cervicogenic Headache, Cortisol, and BDNF in Adolescents With Smartphone Addiction · NA · recruiting
- NCT07347730 — Clinical Study of Myofascial Trigger Points(MTrPs) Injection in the Treatment of Chronic Cervicogenic Headache · NA · recruiting
- NCT07508410 — Comparison of the Eficacy of Mulligan Mobilization and Myofascial Release in Patients With Cervicogenic Headache · NA · recruiting
Other Foundation University Islamabad trials
Trials by the same sponsor.
- NCT07485777 — Comparative Evaluation of Topical 30% Metformin and Kligman's Regimen in Women With Melasma · NA · not yet recruiting
- NCT07495748 — Comparative Evaluation of Topical Metformin and Topical Tranexamic Acid in Melasma · NA · not yet recruiting
- NCT07519174 — A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Effectiveness and Safety of Topical Tacrolimus 0.03% Versus Crisaborole 2% i · NA · not yet recruiting
- NCT07526051 — Effects of Autogenic Inhibition Versus Reciprocal Inhibition in Individuals With Lower Cross Syndrome · NA · recruiting
- NCT07526012 — Comparative Effects Of Post Isometric Relaxation Versus Active Isolated Stretch In Patients With Piriformis Syndrome · NA · recruiting
Verify against primary sources
- ClinicalTrials.gov — authoritative US registry record
- WHO ICTRP — international registry index
- EU Clinical Trials Register
- Sponsor press releases (Google)
- Trial protocol + status: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05777395 (US National Library of Medicine, public domain)
- Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
- Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by Foundation University Islamabad
- Last refreshed: 21 March 2023
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT05777395.
Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing