Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT05748626

Anti-Snoring Appliances and Airway Manipulation in Patients Undergoing Anesthetic Sedation

Completed NA Results posted Last updated 14 August 2025
What this trial tests

NA trial testing Anti-snoring device in Airway Obstruction in 25 participants. Completed in 24 October 2023.

Timeline
6 March 2023
Primary endpoint
30 August 2023
24 October 2023

Quick facts

Lead sponsorNorthwestern University
PhaseNA
StatusCompleted
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designparallel
Maskingnone
Primary purposetreatment
Enrollment25
Start date6 March 2023
Primary completion30 August 2023
Estimated completion24 October 2023
Sites1 location across United States

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Northwestern University

Who can join

Adults 18 to 89, any sex, with Airway Obstruction or Snoring. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.

Combined Total Number of Airway Interventions During an Anesthetic Sedation Case Primary · Through study completion, an average of 1 day

Combined total number of airway interventions during an anesthetic sedation case - including head tilt/rotation, mandible thrust, chin lift, shoulder lift, neck extension or flexion, tongue pull.

GroupValue95% CI
Group #1: Anti-snoring Appliance7
Group #2: Control Group, That Will Not Utilize Anti-snoring Appliance5
Maximum End-tidal CO2 Secondary · Through study completion, an average of 1 day

Maximum end-tidal CO2 using measures the partial pressure or maximal concentration of carbon dioxide (CO2) at the end of an exhaled breath, which is expressed as a percentage of CO2 or mmHg. The normal values are 5% to 6% CO2, which is equivalent to 35-45 mmHg.

GroupValue95% CI
Group #1: Anti-snoring Appliance41± 9.4
Group #2: Control Group, That Will Not Utilize Anti-snoring Appliance44.4± 5.5
Number of Instances SpO2 Value < 92% Secondary · Through study completion, an average of 1 day

Number of instances the SpO2 drops below 92% during the procedure

GroupValue95% CI
Group #1: Anti-snoring Appliance.6± .9
Group #2: Control Group, That Will Not Utilize Anti-snoring Appliance.1± .3
Minimum End-title CO2 in mmHg Secondary · Through study completion, an average of 1 day

Minimum end-tidal CO2 (capnography) using measures the partial pressure or maximal concentration of carbon dioxide (CO2) at the end of an exhaled breath, which is expressed as a percentage of CO2 or mmHg. The normal values are 5% to 6% CO2, which is equivalent to 35-45 mmHg.

GroupValue95% CI
Group #1: Anti-snoring Appliance7± 7.4
Group #2: Control Group, That Will Not Utilize Anti-snoring Appliance6.7± 5.0
Percent Time During the Case the SpO2 is Below 92% Secondary · Through study completion, an average of 1 day

Percent time during the case the SpO2 is below 92% using pulse oximetry.

GroupValue95% CI
Group #1: Anti-snoring Appliance.7± 1.2
Group #2: Control Group, That Will Not Utilize Anti-snoring Appliance.1± .3
Maximum SpO2 Value During the Case Secondary · Through study completion, an average of 1 day

Maximum SpO2 value during the case using pulse oximetry (percent saturated)

GroupValue95% CI
Group #1: Anti-snoring Appliance99.9± .3
Group #2: Control Group, That Will Not Utilize Anti-snoring Appliance99.5± 1.7
Minimum SpO2 Value During the Case Secondary · Through study completion, an average of 1 day

Minimum SpO2 value during the case using pulse oximetry (percent saturation)

GroupValue95% CI
Group #1: Anti-snoring Appliance91.3± 5.9
Group #2: Control Group, That Will Not Utilize Anti-snoring Appliance94.8± 3.0
Heart Rate Maximum Secondary · Through study completion, an average of 1 day

Maximum heart rate during case using standard operating room cardiac monitor

GroupValue95% CI
Group #1: Anti-snoring Appliance80.8± 14.3
Group #2: Control Group, That Will Not Utilize Anti-snoring Appliance82.5± 15
Heart Rate Minimum Secondary · Through study completion, an average of 1 day

Minimum heart rate during case using standard operating room cardiac monitor

GroupValue95% CI
Group #1: Anti-snoring Appliance53.4± 6.5
Group #2: Control Group, That Will Not Utilize Anti-snoring Appliance58.5± 11.1
Maximum Systolic Blood Pressure Secondary · Through study completion, an average of 1 day

Maximum systolic blood pressure (mmHg) using standard operating room blood pressure cuff and monitor.

GroupValue95% CI
Group #1: Anti-snoring Appliance140± 16.9
Group #2: Control Group, That Will Not Utilize Anti-snoring Appliance152.2± 21.7
Minimum Systolic Blood Pressure Secondary · Through study completion, an average of 1 day

Minimum systolic blood pressure (mmHg) using standard operating room blood pressure cuff and monitor.

GroupValue95% CI
Group #1: Anti-snoring Appliance88.9± 9.1
Group #2: Control Group, That Will Not Utilize Anti-snoring Appliance88.1± 13.7
Maximum Diastolic Blood Pressure Secondary · Through study completion, an average of 1 day

Maximum diastolic blood pressure (mmHG) using standard operating room blood pressure cuff and monitor.

GroupValue95% CI
Group #1: Anti-snoring Appliance75.3± 14.3
Group #2: Control Group, That Will Not Utilize Anti-snoring Appliance77.1± 8.7

Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Time frame: 1 Day. Reporting threshold: 0%. Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.

Group #1: Anti-snoring Appliance
Serious: 0/12 (0%)
Deaths: 0/12
Group #2: Control Group, That Will Not Utilize Anti-snoring Appliance
Serious: 0/13 (0%)
Deaths: 0/13
Other adverse events (6 terms — click to expand)

ReactionSystemGroup #1: Anti-snoring App…Group #2: Control Group, T…
CoughRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
BronchospasmRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
RegurgitationGastrointestinal disorders
AspirationRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Case converted to general anesthesiaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Rapid Response Team AlertedCardiac disorders

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05748626 adverse events section.

Sponsor's own description

Would patients using an anti-snoring appliance intraoperatively require less airway manipulation, interventions, and rescue maneuvers during anesthetic sedation cases compared to those who do not? The investigators will use anti-snoring appliance devices (specifically the FDA approved Zyppah) to attempt to relieve tissue obstructions that cause snoring during sleep. The application of the devices to the body is less invasive than other common intraoperative rescue airway devices (e.g. nasal trumpets and oral airways) which are not designed to be patient specific.

Publications & conference data

No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial. Completed trials usually publish results within 12-18 months.

Verify or expand the search:

Other recruiting trials for Airway Obstruction

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other Northwestern University trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT05748626.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing