NCT05721690: UED-VLG

UED-A Videolaryngoscope vs. Glidescope Titanium for Elective Tracheal Intubation

Completed NA Last updated 30 August 2023

What this trial tests

NA trial testing UED-A Videolaryngoscopy in Intubation; Difficult or Failed in 60 participants. Completed in 13 May 2023.

Timeline

1 February 2023

Primary endpoint
12 May 2023

13 May 2023

Quick facts

Lead sponsor	Campus Bio-Medico University
Phase	NA
Status	Completed
Study type	INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation	randomized
Design	parallel
Masking	none
Primary purpose	treatment
Enrollment	60
Start date	1 February 2023
Primary completion	12 May 2023
Estimated completion	13 May 2023
Sites	1 location across Italy

Drugs / interventions tested

• UED-A Videolaryngoscopy
• Glidescope Videolaryngoscopy

Conditions studied

• Intubation; Difficult or Failed — all drugs for Intubation; Difficult or Failed →

Sponsor

Campus Bio-Medico University

Who can join

18 and older, any sex, with Intubation; Difficult or Failed. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Sponsor's own description

The present randomized clinical trial wants to compare the efficacy and safety of UED-A videolaryngoscope to Glidescope Titanium for routinely tracheal intubation in 60 adults, in terms of successful rate, no. attempts and manoeuvre duration.

Publications & conference data

1 peer-reviewed publication reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):

1. Hyper-angulated (Glidescope) versus intermediate-angled (UED-A) videolaryngoscopy for routine tracheal intubation in adults: a prospective randomized controlled trial.
   Migliorelli S, Strumia A, Costa F, Puricelli G, et al · · 2026 · PMID 41535320 · DOI 10.1038/s41598-025-30932-3