Last reviewed · How we verify
NCT05674383
Ultrasound Guided Axillary Nerve Block Compared to Hematoma Block in Patients With Closed Reposition of Distal Forearm Fractures
NA trial testing Axillary plexus nerve block in Distal Radius Fracture in 117 participants. Completed in 28 November 2023.
28 November 2023
Quick facts
| Lead sponsor | Frisius Medisch Centrum |
|---|---|
| Phase | NA |
| Status | Completed |
| Study type | INTERVENTIONAL |
| Allocation | randomized |
| Design | parallel |
| Masking | none |
| Primary purpose | treatment |
| Enrollment | 117 |
| Start date | 1 July 2021 |
| Primary completion | 28 November 2023 |
| Estimated completion | 28 November 2023 |
| Sites | 1 location across Netherlands |
Drugs / interventions tested
- Axillary plexus nerve block
- Fracture hematoma block
Conditions studied
- Distal Radius Fracture — all drugs for Distal Radius Fracture →
- Forearm Fracture — all drugs for Forearm Fracture →
Sponsor
Frisius Medisch Centrum — full company profile →
Who can join
16 and older, any sex, with Distal Radius Fracture or Forearm Fracture. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Sponsor's own description
Rationale: For distal forearm fractures the investigators propose an anaesthetic method using an ultrasound guided axillary nerve block (ANB, an established technique) for pain reduction during reposition dislocated fractures. Nowadays a fracture hematoma block (FHB) is common practice, but is suboptimal due to variability between performing physicians and is often experienced as a painful procedure. The investigators want to investigate if ANB is an effective, safe and efficient option in pain reduction in patients of an ED (emergency department) population with a distal forearm fracture. Objective: To compare ultrasound-guided ANB with FHB for analgesia during reposition of non-operatively treated forearm fractures Study design: A randomized controlled trial. Study population: Patients ≥ 16 years of age with a closed, isolated and displaced distal forearm fracture requiring manipulative reposition. Intervention (if applicable): The intervention group will receive an ANB on the ipsilateral arm of the fracture. The control group will get a FHB. Main study parameters/endpoints: The primary outcome is pain score on a 11-point NRS (numeric rating scale) (0-10) during closed reposition of the dislocated distal forearm fracture in both groups. Main endpoint of this study is achieving a reduction of at least 2 points between both groups. This is considered as clinical relevant. Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: Patients participating in the research group are believed to have less pain and more comfort during reposition of the dislocated fracture. The investigators expect no other or more complications compared to standard care since the known complications are the same for both infiltrative anaesthetic interventions and are rare. Moreover, both procedures are common practice, therefore potential complications will be taken care of properly. The investigators expect there is no prolonged length of stay in the ED.
Publications & conference data
No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial. Completed trials usually publish results within 12-18 months.
Verify or expand the search:
- PubMed search for NCT05674383
- Europe PMC full search
- ASCO Meeting Library
- ESMO Meeting Library
- bioRxiv preprints
- medRxiv preprints
- Google Scholar
Related trials
Other recruiting trials for Distal Radius Fracture
Currently open trials in the same condition.
- NCT07291505 — The Investigation of Kinesiophobia in Conservative Distal Radius Fractures · recruiting
- NCT07042139 — No Reduction Compared to Closed Reduction for Distal Radius Fractures in Patients Over 65 or Older · NA · recruiting
- NCT07426926 — Home-Based Photobiomodulation Effects in the Postoperative Period of Distal Radius Fractures · NA · recruiting
- NCT06769373 — The Effects of Whirlpool and Contrast Bath in Patients with Complex Regional Pain Syndrome After Distal Radius Fracture · NA · recruiting
- NCT07162142 — Retrograde Elastic Nailing With Pollar K-wire in Metaphyseal Diaphyseal Fracture of Distal Radius in Pediatric Patients · NA · active not recruiting
Other Frisius Medisch Centrum trials
Trials by the same sponsor.
- NCT06249035 — Feasibility of TEE During Cardiac Arrest in Dutch Emergency Departments · NA · recruiting
- NCT06558630 — ED Airway Management in the Netherlands. · recruiting
- NCT06202729 — Focus on Experienced Anxiety Related to an Emergency Department Visit · completed
- NCT05732363 — Evaluation of Different Methods to Measure Muscle Mass and Strength in a Population With Class II/III Obesity · completed
- NCT06119711 — Micronutrient Levels and Nutritional Status in Critical Illness · completed
Verify against primary sources
- ClinicalTrials.gov — authoritative US registry record
- WHO ICTRP — international registry index
- EU Clinical Trials Register
- Sponsor press releases (Google)
- Trial protocol + status: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05674383 (US National Library of Medicine, public domain)
- Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
- Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by Frisius Medisch Centrum
- Last refreshed: 29 November 2023
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT05674383.
Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing