Last reviewed · How we verify
NCT05604872
Association Between ORA and Residual Refractive Astigmatism After SMILE
trial testing Small Incision Lenticule Extraction in Refractive Errors in 530 participants. Completed in 30 June 2022.
30 June 2022
Quick facts
| Lead sponsor | Taipei Nobel Eye Clinic |
|---|---|
| Status | Completed |
| Study type | OBSERVATIONAL |
| Enrollment | 530 |
| Start date | 1 June 2020 |
| Primary completion | 30 June 2022 |
| Estimated completion | 30 June 2022 |
| Sites | 1 location across Taiwan |
Drugs / interventions tested
- Small Incision Lenticule Extraction
Conditions studied
- Refractive Errors — all drugs for Refractive Errors →
- Astigmatism — all drugs for Astigmatism →
Sponsor
Taipei Nobel Eye Clinic
Who can join
Adults 20 to 50, any sex, with Refractive Errors or Astigmatism. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Sponsor's own description
The aim of our study is to analysis and compare the relationship between ORA and postoperative astigmatism in low astigmatism (less than 1D) and moderate to high (1D to 3D) astigmatism patients after SMILE (Small Incision Lenticule Extraction) refractive surgery.
Publications & conference data
1 peer-reviewed publication reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):
-
The Association Between Ocular Residual Astigmatism and the Efficacy of Astigmatism Correction Via Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE).
Chao CC, Lin MY, Chang CK. · · 2023 · cited 5× · PMID 37470969 · DOI 10.1007/s40123-023-00766-1
Verify or expand the search:
- PubMed search for NCT05604872
- Europe PMC full search
- ASCO Meeting Library
- ESMO Meeting Library
- bioRxiv preprints
- medRxiv preprints
- Google Scholar
Related trials
Other recruiting trials for Refractive Errors
Currently open trials in the same condition.
- NCT07460557 — Morphological Characteristics of the Maxillomandibular Region in a 3D Representation and the Refractive Status of the Ey · recruiting
- NCT06913491 — Efficacy of PEEK Acuity Versus ETDRS Chart for Assessment of Visual Acuity and Refractive Error · active not recruiting
- NCT07001124 — Comparative Efficacy of Duochrome Test Verse +1 Blur Test in Detecting Refracting Error Across Different Ages · NA · active not recruiting
- NCT06668246 — Performance of Refractometers With Self-adjusting Lenses Compared to Cycloplegia in Children (REFRALENS) · active not recruiting
- NCT05458323 — Cognitive Level Enhancement Through Vision Exams and Refraction · NA · recruiting
Other Taipei Nobel Eye Clinic trials
Trials by the same sponsor.
- NCT06719882 — Vivity Study in Taiwan · active not recruiting
- NCT06165796 — The Effect of LASIK on the Calibration of IOL Formula Calculation: a Comparative Study · completed
- NCT04919291 — Direct Comparison of TG and WFO LASIK · NA · completed
- NCT04557579 — Comparison of Quality of Vision After Bifocal and Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lens Implantation · completed
Verify against primary sources
- ClinicalTrials.gov — authoritative US registry record
- WHO ICTRP — international registry index
- EU Clinical Trials Register
- Sponsor press releases (Google)
- Trial protocol + status: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05604872 (US National Library of Medicine, public domain)
- Publications: Europe PMC API search by NCT ID, retrieved 10 June 2026
- Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
- Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by Taipei Nobel Eye Clinic
- Last refreshed: 3 November 2022
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT05604872.
Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing