Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT05602220: HeartBEAM

Heart Rate and Breathing Effects on Attention and Memory

Completed NA Results posted Last updated 9 January 2026
What this trial tests

NA trial testing Brain training in Aging in 91 participants. Completed in 13 November 2023.

Timeline
11 January 2023
Primary endpoint
6 November 2023
13 November 2023

Quick facts

Lead sponsorUniversity of Southern California
PhaseNA
StatusCompleted
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designparallel
Maskingsingle
Primary purposebasic science
Enrollment91
Start date11 January 2023
Primary completion6 November 2023
Estimated completion13 November 2023
Sites1 location across United States

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

University of Southern California

Who can join

Adults 50 to 70, any sex, with Aging or Alzheimer Disease. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.

Change in Plasma Amyloid Beta (Aβ) Levels Primary · Measured from blood draws at lab visits on Weeks 2, 7, and 12

We computed an aggregate Z-score based on plasma Aβ40 and Aβ42 levels (pg/mL). A Z-score of 0 represents the sample mean. Higher values indicate a greater level of plasma Aβ, which in cognitively normal individuals has been found to be associated with a higher risk of converting to Alzheimer's disease (Song et al., 2011). This score was compared across three time points: Week 2 (pre-intervention), Week 7 (mid-intervention), and Week 12 (post-intervention). We conducted a time (Week 2, 7, 12) × condition ANOVA to test for a time × condition interaction in plasma Aβ levels, assessing group diffe

Week 2
GroupValue95% CI
Brain Training and Paced Breathing to Stimulate Alertness0.343± 0.161
Brain Training and Paced Breathing to Relax-0.371± 0.150
Week 7
GroupValue95% CI
Brain Training and Paced Breathing to Stimulate Alertness0.381± 0.161
Brain Training and Paced Breathing to Relax-0.332± 0.151
Week 12
GroupValue95% CI
Brain Training and Paced Breathing to Stimulate Alertness0.410± 0.161
Brain Training and Paced Breathing to Relax-0.387± 0.150
Change in Plasma Ab42/40 Ratio Primary · Measured from blood draws at lab visits on Weeks 2, 7, and 12

The plasma Aβ42/40 ratio was calculated by dividing the plasma Aβ42 concentration (pg/mL) by the plasma Aβ40 concentration (pg/mL) at each time point. We conducted a time (Week 2, 7, 12) × condition ANOVA to test for an interaction effect, using plasma Aβ42/40 ratio scores as the dependent variable to assess group differences over time. A higher Aβ42/40 ratio indicates a better outcome, reflecting greater brain clearance of Aβ.

Week 2
GroupValue95% CI
Brain Training and Paced Breathing to Stimulate Alertness.040± .001
Brain Training and Paced Breathing to Relax.038± .001
Week 7
GroupValue95% CI
Brain Training and Paced Breathing to Stimulate Alertness.041± .001
Brain Training and Paced Breathing to Relax.039± .001
Week 12
GroupValue95% CI
Brain Training and Paced Breathing to Stimulate Alertness.040± .001
Brain Training and Paced Breathing to Relax.037± .001
Change in Brain Perivascular Space Volume Secondary · Measured from magnetic resonance imaging completed at lab visits on Weeks 2, 7, and 12

We tested whether there were group differences in changes in perivascular space (PVS) volume. PVS volume was defined as the percentage of PVS volume relative to white matter volume in the centrum semiovale, our main region of interest.

Week 2
GroupValue95% CI
Brain Training and Paced Breathing to Stimulate Alertness0.0077± 0.0034
Brain Training and Paced Breathing to Relax0.0079± 0.0043
Week 7
GroupValue95% CI
Brain Training and Paced Breathing to Stimulate Alertness0.0083± 0.0042
Brain Training and Paced Breathing to Relax0.0088± 0.0052
Week 12
GroupValue95% CI
Brain Training and Paced Breathing to Stimulate Alertness0.0092± 0.0054
Brain Training and Paced Breathing to Relax0.0080± 0.0039
Change in Hippocampal Volume Secondary · Measured from magnetic resonance imaging completed at lab visits on Weeks 2, 7, and 12

We tested whether there were group differences in changes in hippocampal volume. We performed a two-way mixed ANCOVA on hippocampal volume, with condition as the between-subjects factor and time point (Week 2, 7, 12) as the within-subjects factor, controlling for intracranial volume as a covariate.

Week 2
GroupValue95% CI
Brain Training and Paced Breathing to Stimulate Alertness7036± 105.0
Brain Training and Paced Breathing to Relax7143± 99.2
Week 7
GroupValue95% CI
Brain Training and Paced Breathing to Stimulate Alertness7038± 105.6
Brain Training and Paced Breathing to Relax7124± 99.8
Week 12
GroupValue95% CI
Brain Training and Paced Breathing to Stimulate Alertness7018± 103.1
Brain Training and Paced Breathing to Relax7102± 97.4
Brain Training Performance on 12 Lumosity Games Secondary · Measured at pre-intervention during week 2 and at the end of the intervention during week 12

Participants completed 12 brain-training games on the Lumosity platform (https://www.lumosity.com/) targeting six cognitive domains: Attention, Flexibility, Language, Math, Memory, and Reasoning. Performance scores were expressed in arbitrary units, with minimum scores generally in the hundreds. The exact lower limits vary across games, and the upper limits differ substantially between games. Across all games, higher scores indicate better cognitive performance. For analyses, standardized performance scores (z-scores) were derived from the raw Lumosity game scores. Scores were standardized wi

baseline performance (bin1)
GroupValue95% CI
Brain Training and Paced Breathing to Stimulate Alertness-2.9144± 1.3024
Brain Training and Paced Breathing to Relax-2.9242± 1.1478
final performance (bin 10)
GroupValue95% CI
Brain Training and Paced Breathing to Stimulate Alertness1.5021± 2.2580
Brain Training and Paced Breathing to Relax1.4551± 1.9558

Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Time frame: 12 weeks. Reporting threshold: 0%. Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.

Brain Training and Paced Breathing to Stimulate Alertness
Serious: 0/31 (0%)
Deaths: 0/31
Brain Training and Paced Breathing to Relax
Serious: 0/31 (0%)
Deaths: 0/31
Other adverse events (3 terms — click to expand)

ReactionSystemBrain Training and Paced B…Brain Training and Paced B…
bruising following a blood drawBlood and lymphatic system disorders
light-headedness during home practiceRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Discomfort during MRI due to body sizeGeneral disorders

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05602220 adverse events section.

Sponsor's own description

In the current study, we will examine how daily paced breathing affects plasma amyloid beta levels and the rate of learning in older adults. Healthy adults aged 50-70 who meet all eligibility criteria will be invited to this study. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of the two conditions: 1) Daily memory and attention training followed by a paced breathing protocol designed to increase relaxation or 2) Daily memory and attention training followed by a paced breathing protocol to increase alertness. Participants will be asked to complete pre and post intervention cognitive testing online, engage in 10 weeks of daily brain training (starting Week 2) and 9 weeks of paced breathing (starting Week 3) at home. They will also be asked to come in for lab visits on Weeks 2, 7 and 12 to provide blood and urine samples to assess amyloid beta levels and to complete magnetic resonance imaging scans to assess perivascular space volume.

Publications & conference data

2 peer-reviewed publications reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):

  1. Heart rate and breathing effects on attention and memory (HeartBEAM): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial in older adults.
    Nashiro K, Yoo HJ, Cho C, Kim AJ, et al · · 2024 · cited 8× · PMID 38491546 · DOI 10.1186/s13063-024-07943-y
  2. Electroencephalography, pupillometry, and behavioral evidence for locus coeruleus-noradrenaline system related tonic hyperactivity in older adults.
    Kim AJ, Morales S, Senior J, Mather M. · · 2026 · PMID 41343912 · DOI 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2025.11.008

Verify or expand the search:

Other recruiting trials for Aging

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other University of Southern California trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT05602220.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing