Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT05575557

Pulmonary Artery Pressure and Right Heart Evaluation for Patients Requiring Physiological Pacing Treatment

Status unknown NA Last updated 29 December 2022
What this trial tests

NA trial testing Right heart catheterization in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction in 100 participants. Status unknown.

Timeline
1 November 2022
Primary endpoint
1 April 2024
1 April 2025

Quick facts

Lead sponsorShanghai 10th People's Hospital
PhaseNA
StatusStatus unknown
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationnon randomized
Designsequential
Maskingnone
Primary purposetreatment
Enrollment100
Start date1 November 2022
Primary completion1 April 2024
Estimated completion1 April 2025
Sites1 location across China

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Shanghai 10th People's Hospital

Who can join

Adults 18 to 99, any sex, with Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction or Atrial Fibrillation, Persistent. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Sponsor's own description

With the aging of society, the use of cardiac pacing in patients with irreversible bradycardia is increasingly widespread. As early as the 1950s, right ventricular pacing (RVP) began to be used in patients with atrioventricular block or sick sinus syndrome, but in fact such pacing could cause ventricular asynchrony, which could lead to long-term myocardial perfusion injury, valvular regurgitation, heart failure, and increased risk of ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation. The latest guideline recommended reducing the proportion of right ventricular pacing. Additionally, in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (EF ≤ 35%) and complete left bundle branch block, cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with biventricular pacing (BVP) has been recommended to improve cardiac function, but only about 30% of patients benefit from it, which may be related to poor left ventricular pacing site and myocardial scarring. In theory, His bundle pacing (HBP) compared with RVP can reduce the risk of functional tricuspid regurgitation when the lead position lies on the atrial side of the tricuspid valve, which may improve the right heart function and pulmonary artery pressure. In 2021, Domenico Grieco et al. explored the effect of HBP on right heart function. After 6 months of follow-up, it was found that HBP improved right heart function and pulmonary artery pressure compared with RVP. At present, there are few discussions on the effect of physiological pacing on right ventricular hemodynamics, and the sample size is small. Internationally, the discussion of the assessment of hemodynamics is limited to non-invasive evaluation (such as echocardiography, ECG, SPECT) The gold standard for right heart hemodynamics evaluation is the measurement of invasive right heart catheterization, and there has been no relevant research so far, so the investigators further designed a study of the effect of physiological pacing on hemodynamics.

Publications & conference data

No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial.

Verify or expand the search:

Other trials of Right heart catheterization

Trials testing the same drug.

Other recruiting trials for Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other Shanghai 10th People's Hospital trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT05575557.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing