18 and older, any sex, with Respiratory Failure. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
Ventilator-free Days (VFDs) to Day 28 After EnrollmentPrimary· Enrollment to 28 days
Number of days alive and free from invasive mechanical ventilation between the final liberation from invasive mechanical ventilation before 28 days and study day 28. Patients who continue to receive invasive mechanical ventilation at day 28 or have died prior to day 28 will receive zero VFDs. For patients who return to invasive mechanical ventilation and are subsequently liberated from invasive mechanical ventilation prior to day 28, VFDs will be counted from final liberation from mechanical ventilation.
Group
Value
95% CI
Volume Control Mode
23
0 – 26
Pressure Control Mode
22
0 – 26
Adaptive Pressure Control Mode
24
0 – 26
Exposure to Assigned Study Mode in First 3 Days (Feasibility Outcome)Secondary· Enrollment to 72 hours
Percentage of time in the assigned mode while receiving invasive mechanical ventilation in the study ICU between enrollment and 72 hours after enrollment.
Group
Value
95% CI
Volume Control Mode
87.5
61.0 – 98.4
Pressure Control Mode
90.2
56.6 – 98.9
Adaptive Pressure Control Mode
93.8
74.2 – 99.7
Adherence to Study Mode in First 3 Days (Feasibility Outcome)Secondary· Enrollment to 72 hours
Percentage of time in the assigned mode while receiving invasive mechanical ventilation in the study ICU with a mandatory mode between enrollment and 72 hours after enrollment (excluding time spent in spontaneous modes).
Group
Value
95% CI
Volume Control Mode
100.0
100.0 – 100.0
Pressure Control Mode
100.0
98.9 – 100.0
Adaptive Pressure Control Mode
100.0
100.0 – 100.0
Time From Enrollment to Initiation of Assigned Mode of Mechanical Ventilation (Feasibility Outcome)Secondary· Enrollment to 28 days
Group
Value
95% CI
Volume Control Mode
5.2
1.7 – 16.6
Pressure Control Mode
5.2
1.4 – 17.1
Adaptive Pressure Control Mode
4.6
0.8 – 15.1
Number of Patients With a "Mode Modification Sheet" Completed by Treating Clinicians (Feasibility Outcome)Secondary· Enrollment to 28 days
Group
Value
95% CI
Volume Control Mode
19
Pressure Control Mode
25
Adaptive Pressure Control Mode
4
Exhaled Tidal Volume (mL/kg Predicted Body Weight) (Exploratory Efficacy and Safety Outcome)Secondary· Enrollment to the first of extubation, 28 days, or death
Group
Value
95% CI
Volume Control Mode
6.2
5.9 – 7.1
Pressure Control Mode
6.4
5.8 – 7.4
Adaptive Pressure Control Mode
6.2
5.9 – 6.9
Percentage of Exhaled Tidal Volumes Above Target Range (Exploratory Efficacy and Safety Outcome)Secondary· Enrollment to the first of extubation, 28 days, or death
Percentage of exhaled tidal volume values above target range (\>8mL/kg predicted body weight), reported as a percentage.
Group
Value
95% CI
Volume Control Mode
0.0
0.0 – 8.3
Pressure Control Mode
6.8
0.0 – 31.4
Adaptive Pressure Control Mode
3.6
0.0 – 14.3
Hypoxemia During Mechanical Ventilation (Exploratory Safety and Efficacy Outcome)Secondary· Enrollment to the first of 28 days or death
Hypoxemia during mechanical ventilation defined as an SpO2 \<85% for more than 5 minutes
Group
Value
95% CI
Volume Control Mode
21
Pressure Control Mode
20
Adaptive Pressure Control Mode
14
Severe Acidemia During Mechanical Ventilation (Exploratory Safety and Efficacy Outcome)Secondary· Enrollment to 28 days
Severe acidemia during mechanical ventilation: pH \< 7.1 on blood gas
Group
Value
95% CI
Volume Control Mode
22
Pressure Control Mode
21
Adaptive Pressure Control Mode
14
Number of Blood Gas Laboratory Tests on the First Study Day (Exploratory Safety and Efficacy Outcome)Secondary· Enrollment to 1 day
Group
Value
95% CI
Volume Control Mode
3
1 – 5
Pressure Control Mode
2
1 – 5
Adaptive Pressure Control Mode
3
1 – 5
Pneumomediastinum or Pneumothorax During Mechanical Ventilation (Exploratory Efficacy and Safety Outcome)Secondary· Enrollment to 28 days
Group
Value
95% CI
Volume Control Mode
4
Pressure Control Mode
6
Adaptive Pressure Control Mode
1
SOFA Score on the First Study Day (Exploratory Safety and Efficacy Outcome)Secondary· Enrollment to 1 day
The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score is composed of scores from six organ systems, graded from 0 to 4 according to the degree of dysfunction or failure. Scores range from 0 (no evidence of organ dysfunction or failure) to 24 (evidence of severe organ dysfunction or failure). The mean of SOFA scores on study day 1 was calculated for each patient.
Group
Value
95% CI
Volume Control Mode
11.0
8.4 – 13.9
Pressure Control Mode
11.9
8.5 – 14.0
Adaptive Pressure Control Mode
11.0
8.4 – 13.9
Sponsor's own description
Landmark trials in critical care have demonstrated that, among critically ill adults receiving invasive mechanical ventilation, the use of low tidal volumes and low airway pressures prevents lung injury and improves patient outcomes. Limited evidence, however, informs the best method of mechanical ventilation to achieve these targets. To provide mechanical ventilation, clinicians must choose between modes of ventilation that directly control tidal volumes ("volume control"), modes that directly control the inspiratory airway pressure ("pressure control"), and modes that are hybrids ("adaptive pressure control"). Whether the choice of the mode used to target low tidal volumes and low inspiratory plateau pressures affects clinical outcomes for critically ill adults receiving mechanical ventilation is unknown. All three modes of mechanical ventilation are commonly used in clinical practice. A large, multicenter randomized trial comparing available modes of mechanical ventilation is needed to understand the effect of each mode on clinical outcomes. The investigators propose a 9-month cluster-randomized cluster-crossover pilot trial evaluating the feasibility of comparing three modes (volume control, pressure control, and adaptive pressure control) for mechanically ventilated ICU patients with regard to the outcome of days alive and free of invasive mechanical ventilation.
Publications & conference data
3 peer-reviewed publications reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):
NCT07522450 — Benefit of Sleep Quality Monitoring by EEG in ICU
· recruiting
NCT07359261 — Transpulmonary Assessment for Individualized Lung Optimization in Obese Patients
· Phase 2
· recruiting
NCT07536750 — Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Ciprofol Versus Propofol for Sedation in ICU Patients Undergoing Non-Invasive V
· recruiting
NCT07114289 — Spontaneous Breathing Trials Using Pressure Support or T-Piece in Overweight and Obese Patients
· NA
· recruiting
NCT06591533 — The Effect of Music Therapy on Vital Signs and Heart Rate Variability of Pediatric Patients During the Extubation Proces
· NA
· recruiting
Other Vanderbilt University Medical Center trials
Trials by the same sponsor.
NCT07005037 — Swallowing Impairments in ICU Survivors and Community-Dwelling Adults
· not yet recruiting
NCT07527273 — Cognitive Enhancement in Recurrent Depression (The COG-D-R Study)
· NA
· not yet recruiting
NCT07295288 — Botox Injections in Non-Cranial Nerve VII Innervated Muscles for Facial Synkinesis
· Phase 4
· not yet recruiting
NCT07431541 — Topical Carboxytherapy Paste Following Microneedling
· Phase 1, PHASE2
· not yet recruiting
NCT07224711 — The Impact of Perioperative Lidocaine Infusions on Enhanced Recovery After Non-Cardiac Surgery
· Phase 4
· not yet recruiting
Publications: Europe PMC API search by NCT ID, retrieved 10 June 2026
Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Last refreshed: 23 February 2026
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT05563779.