18 and older, any sex, with Carcinoma, Renal Cell. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
Progression Free Survival (PFS)Primary· From treatment initiation date until PD, death or end of follow-up period whichever was earlier (maximum follow-up of 47.1 months)
PFS was defined as time from treatment initiation of systemic 1-L therapy start date to documented date of tumor progression or date of death. Disease progression (PD) was defined as greater than equal to (\>=) 20% increase in sum of diameters of the target lesions taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this included the baseline sum if that was the smallest on study) or unequivocal progression in non-target lesions or appearance of 1 or more new lesions. Analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method.
Group
Value
95% CI
All Participants
9.4
0.7 – 46.7
PFS Rate at Month 6Primary· 6 months post treatment initiation date (during maximum follow-up of 47.1 months)
PFS was defined as time from treatment initiation of systemic 1-L therapy start date to documented date of tumor progression or date of death. Disease progression (PD) was defined as greater than equal to (\>=) 20% increase in sum of diameters of the target lesions taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this included the baseline sum if that was the smallest on study) or unequivocal progression in non-target lesions or appearance of 1 or more new lesions. PFS rate was percentage of participants with PFS.
Group
Value
95% CI
All Participants
64.4
PFS Rate at Month 9Primary· 9 months post treatment initiation date (during maximum follow-up of 47.1 months)
PFS was defined as time from treatment initiation of systemic 1-L therapy start date to documented date of tumor progression or date of death. Disease progression (PD) was defined as greater than equal to (\>=) 20% increase in sum of diameters of the target lesions taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this included the baseline sum if that was the smallest on study) or unequivocal progression in non-target lesions or appearance of 1 or more new lesions. PFS rate was percentage of participants with PFS.
Group
Value
95% CI
All Participants
52.9
PFS Rate at Month 12Primary· 12 months post treatment initiation date (during maximum follow-up of 47.1 months)
PFS was defined as time from treatment initiation of systemic 1-L therapy start date to documented date of tumor progression or date of death. Disease progression (PD) was defined as greater than equal to (\>=) 20% increase in sum of diameters of the target lesions taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this included the baseline sum if that was the smallest on study) or unequivocal progression in non-target lesions or appearance of 1 or more new lesions. PFS rate was percentage of participants with PFS.
Group
Value
95% CI
All Participants
41.3
PFS Rate at Month 18Primary· 18 months post treatment initiation date (during maximum follow-up of 47.1 months)
PFS was defined as time from treatment initiation of systemic 1-L therapy start date to documented date of tumor progression or date of death. Disease progression (PD) was defined as greater than equal to (\>=) 20% increase in sum of diameters of the target lesions taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this included the baseline sum if that was the smallest on study) or unequivocal progression in non-target lesions or appearance of 1 or more new lesions. PFS rate was percentage of participants with PFS.
Group
Value
95% CI
All Participants
29.8
Overall Survival (OS)Secondary· From treatment initiation to death due to any cause or last day of contact, whichever occurred first (maximum follow-up of 47.1 months)
OS was defined as time from treatment initiation of systemic 1-L therapy to date of death due to any cause or last day of contact. Analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method.
Group
Value
95% CI
All Participants
17.5
0.3 – 47.1
OS Rate at Months 12 and 18Secondary· 12- and 18-months post treatment initiation date (during maximum follow-up of 47.1 months)
OS was defined as time from treatment initiation of systemic 1-L therapy to date of death due to any cause or last day of contact. OS rate was measured as percentage of participants alive at specified time points.
Month 12
Group
Value
95% CI
All Participants
65.4
Month 18
Group
Value
95% CI
All Participants
49.0
Number of Participants According to Different Treatments ReceivedSecondary· From treatment initiation to end of follow-up (maximum follow-up of 47.1 months)
Number of participants were classified according to different drug groups prescribed: Immune checkpoint inhibitors + Tyrosine kinase inhibitor (ICI +TKI), ICI+ICI, TKI alone and ICI alone.
Group
Value
95% CI
All Participants
48
All Participants
21
All Participants
24
All Participants
11
Number of Participants With Different Drug TherapiesSecondary· From treatment initiation to end of follow-up (maximum follow-up of 47.1 months)
Number of participants were classified according to different drug regimen therapies prescribed: pembrolizumab + axitinib, nivolumab + ipilimumab, sunitinib, nivolumab, cabozantinib, tivozanib, pembrolizumab, pazopanib, axitinib and avelumab + axitinib.
Group
Value
95% CI
All Participants
46
All Participants
21
All Participants
11
All Participants
8
Best Overall ResponseSecondary· From treatment initiation until first documented PD or death or end of follow-up, whichever occurred first (maximum follow-up of 47.1 months)
Best overall response was documented as the best response documented in the participant record. CR was defined as complete resolution of all visible disease as per the treating physician's opinion. PR was defined as partial reduction in size of visible disease in some or all areas without any areas of increase in visible disease. Disease progression (PD) was defined as greater than equal to (\>=) 20% increase in sum of diameters of the target lesions taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this included the baseline sum if that was the smallest on study) or unequivocal progression in no
CR
Group
Value
95% CI
All Participants
5.8
PR
Group
Value
95% CI
All Participants
35.6
SD
Group
Value
95% CI
All Participants
5.8
PD
Group
Value
95% CI
All Participants
1.9
Not Evaluable
Group
Value
95% CI
All Participants
5.8
Not Applicable
Group
Value
95% CI
All Participants
45.2
Duration of Response (DOR)Secondary· From first disease response until tumor progression (maximum follow-up of 47.1 months)
DOR was defined as time from first disease response (CR/PR) to tumor progression among participants with a documented response and also had a documented date of response. CR was defined as complete resolution of all visible disease as per the treating physician's opinion. PR was defined as partial reduction in size of visible disease in some or all areas without any areas of increase in visible disease. Analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method.
Group
Value
95% CI
All Participants
9.3
2.1 – 19.8
Time to Progression (TTP)Secondary· From treatment initiation until tumor progression or end of follow-up whichever occurred first (maximum follow-up of 47.1 months)
TTP was defined as time from start of treatment of systemic 1 L therapy up to tumor progression without including deaths. Disease progression (PD) was defined as greater than equal to (\>=) 20% increase in sum of diameters of the target lesions taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this included the baseline sum if that was the smallest on study) or unequivocal progression in non-target lesions or appearance of 1 or more new lesions. Analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method.
Group
Value
95% CI
All Participants
9.7
0.7 – 46.7
Sponsor's own description
The purpose of this study is to learn about the treatments used in for advanced renal cell carcinoma as well as effectiveness of these treatments in the real world. Study participants must be:
At least 18 years of age or older. Confirmed renal cell carcinoma Received first line treatment
Publications & conference data
No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial.
NCT07405164 — Extension Study for Participants in Studies That Include Belzutifan (MK-6482-043/LITESPARK-043)
· Phase 3
· recruiting
NCT07227415 — Symbiotic-GU-08: A Study to Learn About the Medicine Called PF-08634404 Dosed Alone and in Combination With Other Antica
· Phase 1, PHASE2
· recruiting
NCT06222593 — Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Bicalutamide in Combination With Sunitinib in Patients With TKIs-resistant
· Phase 1, PHASE2
· recruiting
NCT07166445 — Deep Learning for Automated Discrimination Between Stage T1-T2 and T3 Renal Cell Carcinoma on Contrast-Enhanced CT
· recruiting
NCT06676527 — Vorolanib in the Second-line Treatment of Patients With Unresectable or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma
· recruiting
Other Pfizer trials
Trials by the same sponsor.
NCT04982848 — Korea Post Marketing Surveillance (PMS) Study of Talzenna®
· not yet recruiting
NCT06873191 — A Study to Learn More About Tukysa Once it is Out in the Korean Market
· not yet recruiting
NCT07497854 — A Study to Learn About the Study Medicine NURTEC® ODT 75 mg After it is Released Into the Markets in Korea
· not yet recruiting
NCT06507904 — A Study to Learn How Different Preparations of Osivelotor Taste and Enter the Blood With Food or Liquids or With an Anta
· Phase 1
· not yet recruiting
NCT06864585 — A Study to Learn About the Study Medicine - Zavicefta in Patients With Sepsis or Loss of Kidney Function in Japan
· not yet recruiting
Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by Pfizer
Last refreshed: 20 January 2025
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT05534789.