Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT05529966

Comparing NGENUITY vs Conventional Microscope in a New Hydrus User

Completed NA Results posted Last updated 17 April 2025
What this trial tests

NA trial testing NGENUITY in Glaucoma in 32 participants. Completed in 22 March 2024.

Timeline
13 February 2023
Primary endpoint
22 March 2024
22 March 2024

Quick facts

Lead sponsorStanford University
PhaseNA
StatusCompleted
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designparallel
Maskingsingle
Primary purposeother
Enrollment32
Start date13 February 2023
Primary completion22 March 2024
Estimated completion22 March 2024
Sites1 location across United States

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Stanford University

Who can join

18 and older, any sex, with Glaucoma. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.

Time of First Cannula in Until Satisfactory Stent Placement and Cannula Out Primary · up to 1 hour
GroupValue95% CI
Conventional Microscope2.55± 1.36
NGENUITY3.06± 2.17
Number of Trabecular Meshwork Piercing Attempts Needed to Place Stent Secondary · up to 1 hour
GroupValue95% CI
Conventional Microscope1.50± 0.94
NGENUITY1.53± 0.92
Number of Anterior Chamber Entry and Reentry Attempts During Stent Placement Secondary · up to 1 hour
GroupValue95% CI
Conventional Microscope1.14± 0.36
NGENUITY1.13± 0.35
Number of Microscope Focus or Position Readjustments Needed During Stent Placement Secondary · up to 1 hour
GroupValue95% CI
Conventional Microscope1.43± 1.28
NGENUITY1.93± 1.79
Change in Attending Questionnaire Score Secondary · Up to 5 minutes

Providers rate their comfort, visibility, image quality, focus, depth perception, staff engagement, teaching and level of confidence in using the system and system performance. Ratings are on a Likert scale of 1 to 5. Higher scores correspond to excellent ratings, higher confidence in using the system, and better system performance; for Scope Preference only, lower numbers (either group) correspond to a preference for NGenuity visualization.

Comfort
GroupValue95% CI
Conventional Microscope3.14± 0.53
NGENUITY3.93± 0.80
Visibility
GroupValue95% CI
Conventional Microscope3.57± 0.85
NGENUITY4.53± 0.64
Image Quality
GroupValue95% CI
Conventional Microscope3.14± 0.77
NGENUITY4.6± 0.74
Focus
GroupValue95% CI
Conventional Microscope3.14± 0.66
NGENUITY4.0± 1.25
Depth Perception
GroupValue95% CI
Conventional Microscope2.93± 0.73
NGENUITY4.67± 0.62
Staff Engagement
GroupValue95% CI
Conventional Microscope3.36± 0.50
NGENUITY4.27± 0.80
Teaching
GroupValue95% CI
Conventional Microscope3.29± 0.73
NGENUITY4.67± 0.62
En Face Confidence
GroupValue95% CI
Conventional Microscope3.43± 0.51
NGENUITY4.07± 0.96
Change in Fellow Questionnaire Score Secondary · Up to 5 minutes

Providers rate their comfort, visibility, image quality, focus, depth perception, staff engagement, teaching and level of confidence in using the system and system performance. Ratings are on a Likert scale of 1 to 5. Higher scores correspond to excellent ratings, higher confidence in using the system, and better system performance; for Scope Preference only, lower numbers (either group) correspond to a preference for NGenuity visualization.

Comfort
GroupValue95% CI
Conventional Microscope4.21± 0.89
NGENUITY4.20± 0.56
Visibility
GroupValue95% CI
Conventional Microscope4.21± 0.80
NGENUITY4.60± 0.83
Image Quality
GroupValue95% CI
Conventional Microscope4.21± 0.80
NGENUITY4.60± 0.83
Focus
GroupValue95% CI
Conventional Microscope3.93± 0.83
NGENUITY4.40± 0.91
Depth Perception
GroupValue95% CI
Conventional Microscope4.29± 0.61
NGENUITY4.73± 0.59
Staff Engagement
GroupValue95% CI
Conventional Microscope3.57± 0.94
NGENUITY4.73± 0.59
Teaching
GroupValue95% CI
Conventional Microscope4.00± 0.78
NGENUITY4.80± 0.56
En Face Confidence
GroupValue95% CI
Conventional Microscope4.00± 0.88
NGENUITY4.33± 0.82

Sponsor's own description

To compare the potential efficiency and educational value of using NGENUITY (3D camera system, FDA approved for this indication) vs the conventional microscope for Hydrus microstent placement by new users.

Publications & conference data

No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial. Completed trials usually publish results within 12-18 months.

Verify or expand the search:

Other recruiting trials for Glaucoma

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other Stanford University trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT05529966.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing