Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT05497258

IDEAS-AAP System Diagnoses Acute Abdominal Pain

Completed NA Last updated 8 November 2022
What this trial tests

NA trial testing Artificial intelligence assistant system in Artificial Intelligence in 151 participants. Completed in 1 October 2022.

Timeline
15 August 2022
Primary endpoint
1 September 2022
1 October 2022

Quick facts

Lead sponsorRenmin Hospital of Wuhan University
PhaseNA
StatusCompleted
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designparallel
Maskingnone
Primary purposediagnostic
Enrollment151
Start date15 August 2022
Primary completion1 September 2022
Estimated completion1 October 2022
Sites1 location across China

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University

Who can join

18 and older, any sex, with Artificial Intelligence or Diagnoses Disease. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Sponsor's own description

This is a study to validate the effect of the intelligent diagnostic evidence-based analytic system in acute abdominal pain augmentation. Included physicians were randomly assigned into control or AI-assisted group. In this experiment, the whole electronic health record of each acute abdominal pain patient was divided into two parts, signs and symptoms recording (including chief complaint, present history, physical examination, past medical history, trauma surgery history, personal history, family history, obstetrical history, menstrual history, blood transfusion history, drug allergy history) and auxiliary examination recording (including laboratory examination and radiology report). For each case, the control group readers will first read the signs and symptoms recording of electronic health record and make a clinical diagnosis. Then the readers have to decide to either order a list of auxiliary examinations or confirm the clinical diagnosis without further examination. If the readers choose to order examinations, the corresponding examination results will be feedback to the readers, and the readers can then decide to either continue to order a list of auxiliary examinations or make a confirming diagnosis. Such cycle will last until the reader make a confirming diagnosis. For the AI-assisted readers, the physicians were additionally provided with the feature extracted by IDEAS-AAP, a list of suspicious diagnoses predicted by IDEAS-AAP, and corresponding diagnostic criteria according to guidelines. After the readers get the examination results, the IDEAS-AAP will renew its diagnosis prediction

Publications & conference data

No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial. Completed trials usually publish results within 12-18 months.

Verify or expand the search:

Other trials of Artificial intelligence assistant system

Trials testing the same drug.

Other recruiting trials for Artificial Intelligence

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT05497258.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing