Last reviewed · How we verify
NCT05495438: ICU
Impact and Safety of AI in Decision Making in the ICU: a Simulation Experiment
trial testing Hypothetical AI in Sepsis in 38 participants. Completed in 31 October 2022.
31 October 2022
Quick facts
| Lead sponsor | Imperial College London |
|---|---|
| Status | Completed |
| Study type | OBSERVATIONAL |
| Enrollment | 38 |
| Start date | 22 July 2022 |
| Primary completion | 31 October 2022 |
| Estimated completion | 31 October 2022 |
| Sites | 1 location across United Kingdom |
Drugs / interventions tested
- Hypothetical AI
Conditions studied
- Sepsis — all drugs for Sepsis →
Sponsor
Imperial College London
Who can join
18 and older, any sex, with Sepsis. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Sponsor's own description
The impact of deploying artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare settings in unclear, in particular with regards to how it will influence human decision makers. Previous research demonstrated that AI alerts were frequently ignored (Kamal et al., 2020 ) or could lead to unexpected behaviour with worsening of patient outcomes (Wilson et al., 2021 ). On the other hand, excessive confidence and trust placed in the AI could have several adverse consequences including ability to detect harmful AI decisions, leading to patient harm as well as human deskilling. Some of these aspects relate to automation bias. In this simulation study, the investigators intend to measure whether medical decisions in areas of high clinical uncertainty are modified by the use of an AI-based clinical decision support tool. How the dose of intravenous fluids (IVF) and vasopressors administered by doctors in adult patients with sepsis (severe infection with organ failure) in the ICU), changes as a result of disclosing the doses suggested by a hypothetical AI will be measured. The area of sepsis resuscitation is poorly codified, with high uncertainty leading to high variability in practice. This study will not specifically mention the AI Clinician (Komorowski et al., 2018). Instead, the investigators will describe a hypothetical AI for which there is some evidence of effectiveness on retrospective data in another clinical setting (e.g. a model that was retrospectively validated using data from a different country than the source data used for model training) but no prospective evidence of effectiveness or safety. As such, it is possible for this hypothetical AI to provide unsafe suggestions. The investigators will intentionally introduce unsafe AI suggestions (in random order), to measure the sensitivity of our participants at detecting these.
Publications & conference data
No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial. Completed trials usually publish results within 12-18 months.
Verify or expand the search:
- PubMed search for NCT05495438
- Europe PMC full search
- ASCO Meeting Library
- ESMO Meeting Library
- bioRxiv preprints
- medRxiv preprints
- Google Scholar
Related trials
Other recruiting trials for Sepsis
Currently open trials in the same condition.
- NCT07507877 — Infraclavicular Axillary Vein Collapsibility Index as a Predictor of Fluid Responsiveness · recruiting
- NCT07154615 — Assessing Immune Dysfunction in Sepsis · recruiting
- NCT07419802 — OxiCLEAR (Oxiris Cytokines and Endotoxin Adsorption Rate) Study · recruiting
- NCT07351344 — African Survey on Sepsis Knowledge (ASK) · recruiting
- NCT07448805 — Accuracy and Safety of the Syai Tag System for Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Intensive Internal Care Unit · NA · recruiting
Other Imperial College London trials
Trials by the same sponsor.
- NCT06035861 — Endothelial Cell Activation and Total Pulmonary Resistance in PAH · NA · not yet recruiting
- NCT07397455 — Development of a Controlled Human Infection Model for Assessment of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Subvariants · Phase 1 · not yet recruiting
- NCT07422532 — A Multi-centre Trial to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of the Omnipod 5 System in People With Type 2 Diabetes Undergoing · NA · not yet recruiting
- NCT07389031 — Maralixibat for Intrahepatic Cholestasis of Pregnancy · Phase 2 · not yet recruiting
- NCT07358897 — Gender Affirming Hormone Therapy and Immune Function in Trans Individuals - The GIFT Study · not yet recruiting
Verify against primary sources
- ClinicalTrials.gov — authoritative US registry record
- WHO ICTRP — international registry index
- EU Clinical Trials Register
- Sponsor press releases (Google)
- Trial protocol + status: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05495438 (US National Library of Medicine, public domain)
- Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
- Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by Imperial College London
- Last refreshed: 27 February 2023
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT05495438.
Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing