22 and older, any sex, with End Stage Renal Disease. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
Percentage of Successful Hemodialysis SessionsPrimary· 3 weeks total: 1 week for 3 control sessions and 2 weeks for 6 experimental (V Needle) sessions per subject
A successful hemodialysis session is one in which the physician's dialysis prescription has been appropriately delivered. There are only two options for results: successful or unsuccessful. Success rates will be calculated for 3 control sessions using standard of care needles and compared with the average success rate determined from 6 experimental V Needle sessions.
Group
Value
95% CI
Control Device
100
Test Device
98.9
Machine Alarm Rate (Blood Alarms Only) During Hemodialysis Therapy Sessions, Including False Alarms.Secondary· 3 weeks total: 1 week for 3 control sessions and 2 weeks for 6 experimental (V Needle) sessions per subject
The hemodialysis machine alarm rate will be monitored per session and then averaged and compared for three control sessions using standard of care needles and then again for six experimental V Needle sessions.
Group
Value
95% CI
Control Device
1.11
± 0.25
Test Device
1.92
± 0.51
False Alarms Per Session (as a % of All Venous Alarms Per Same Session)Secondary· 3 weeks (time required to complete all control and test dialysis sessions per patient)
Overall false alarm rate per hemodialysis session as determined as a percentage of all venous alarms.
Group
Value
95% CI
Standard of Care (Baseline/Control) Performance Assessment
82
V Needle (Test) Performance Assessment
83.66
Venous Alarm Rate (All) Per SessionSecondary· 3 weeks total: 1 week for 3 control sessions and 2 weeks for 6 experimental (V Needle) sessions per subject
Rate of venous alarms per hemodialysis session
Group
Value
95% CI
Standard of Care (Baseline/Control) Performance Assessment
0.14
± 0.43
V Needle (Test) Performance Assessment
0.36
± 0.38
% All (False) Alarms Related to V Needle Footplate Opening InappropriatelySecondary· 3 weeks total: 1 week for 3 control sessions and 2 weeks for 6 experimental (V Needle) sessions per subject
% All (false) Alarms Related to V Needle footplate opening inappropriately during each hemodialysis session
Group
Value
95% CI
V Needle (Test) Performance Assessment
0
% All Alarms Related to Venous NeedleSecondary· 3 weeks total: 1 week for 3 control sessions and 2 weeks for 6 experimental (V Needle) sessions per subject
% of all alarms related to Venous needle per hemodialysis session
Group
Value
95% CI
Standard of Care (Baseline/Control) Performance Assessment
12
V Needle (Test) Performance Assessment
18
% Hemodialysis Sessions Requiring a Change to Blood Flow Rate Setting During TherapySecondary· 3 weeks total: 1 week for 3 control sessions and 2 weeks for 6 experimental (V Needle) sessions per subject
Percentage of the hemodialyis sessions during which the clinical staff was required to change the original blood flow rate setting during therapy sessions
Group
Value
95% CI
Standard of Care (Baseline/Control) Performance Assessment
6.67
V Needle (Test) Performance Assessment
3.33
Mean Venous Pressure (in mm Hg) Per Hemodialyis Session for Subjects Dialyzing at 400 mL/MinSecondary· 3 weeks total: 1 week for 3 control sessions and 2 weeks for 6 experimental (V Needle) sessions per subject
Mean Venous Pressure (in mm Hg) per hemodialysis session for subjects dialyzing at a flow rate of 400 mL/min
Group
Value
95% CI
Standard of Care (Baseline/Control) Performance Assessment
179
± 31
V Needle (Test) Performance Assessment
208
± 37
Mean Venous Pressure (in mm Hg) Per Hemodialyis Session for Subjects Dialyzing at 450 mL/MinSecondary· 3 weeks total: 1 week for 3 control sessions and 2 weeks for 6 experimental (V Needle) sessions per subject
Mean Venous Pressure (in mm Hg\_) per hemodialysis session for subjects dialyzing at a flow rate of 450 mL/min
Group
Value
95% CI
Standard of Care (Baseline/Control) Performance Assessment
213
± 30
V Needle (Test) Performance Assessment
247
± 35
Mean Transmembrane Pressure (in mm Hg) Per Session for Subjects Dialyzing at 400 mL/MinSecondary· 3 weeks total: 1 week for 3 control sessions and 2 weeks for 6 experimental (V Needle) sessions per subject
Mean Transmembrane Pressure (mm Hg) per hemodialysis session for subjects dialyzing at 400 mL/min
Group
Value
95% CI
Standard of Care (Baseline/Control) Performance Assessment
48
± 17
V Needle (Test) Performance Assessment
48
± 16
Mean Transmembrane Pressure (mm Hg) Per Session for Subjects Dialyzing at 450 mL/MinSecondary· 3 weeks total: 1 week for 3 control sessions and 2 weeks for 6 experimental (V Needle) sessions per subject
Mean Transmembrane Pressure (mm Hg) per hemodialysis session for subjects dialyzing at 450 mL/min
Group
Value
95% CI
Standard of Care (Baseline/Control) Performance Assessment
43
± 14
V Needle (Test) Performance Assessment
44
± 13
Mean Arterial Pressure (in mm Hg) Per Session for Subjects Dialyzing at a Flow Rate 400 mL/MinSecondary· 3 weeks total: 1 week for 3 control sessions and 2 weeks for 6 experimental (V Needle) sessions per subject
Mean Arterial Pressure (mm Hg) per each session for subjects dialyzing at a flow rate of 400 mL/min
Group
Value
95% CI
Standard of Care (Baseline/Control) Performance Assessment
-167
± 32
V Needle (Test) Performance Assessment
-175
± 36
Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Time frame: All AE data and outcomes data was captured per session, with 3 control sessions, in the first week, followed by 6 experimental sessions over the next two weeks, resulting in a three week data collection period per subject. Additionally, all subjects were followed for 7 more days following each of their study dialysis sessions to observe for any potential AEs. Thus, data collection coupled with AE observation resulted in an overall observation period of 4 weeks total per subject..
Reporting threshold: 0%.
Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.
This study is a prospective, multi-center, single-arm study with subjects acting as their own control designed to confirm the safety, performance, and usability of the V Needle, a new safety needle for use during in-clinic hemodialysis that is designed to automatically generate a partial occlusion of the internal fluid path and trigger the hemodialysis machine to alarm and shut off if a complete dislodgement of the venous needle from the arm inadvertently occurs.
Publications & conference data
No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial. Completed trials usually publish results within 12-18 months.
Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by Hemotek Medical Inc
Last refreshed: 5 February 2025
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT05493423.