Last reviewed · How we verify
NCT05475899
Comparison of Instrument Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization and Kinesiology Taping on Plantar Fasciitis
NA trial testing Instrument assisted soft tissue mobilization in Plantar Fascitis in 36 participants. Completed in 15 May 2022.
31 March 2022
Quick facts
| Lead sponsor | Riphah International University |
|---|---|
| Phase | NA |
| Status | Completed |
| Study type | INTERVENTIONAL |
| Allocation | randomized |
| Design | parallel |
| Masking | single |
| Primary purpose | treatment |
| Enrollment | 36 |
| Start date | 10 June 2021 |
| Primary completion | 31 March 2022 |
| Estimated completion | 15 May 2022 |
| Sites | 2 locations across Pakistan |
Drugs / interventions tested
- Instrument assisted soft tissue mobilization
Conditions studied
- Plantar Fascitis — all drugs for Plantar Fascitis →
Sponsor
Riphah International University
Who can join
Adults 25 to 65, any sex, with Plantar Fascitis. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Sponsor's own description
The main objective of this study is to compare the effects of Instrument Assisted soft tissue mobilization and kinesiology taping on the pain, disability and range of motion of the patients and to compare the cost-effectiveness of both these treatment approaches. RCT done at health professionals, Life Care International hospital, and railway general hospital. The sample size was 36. Patients diagnosed with plantar fasciitis were randomized into 2 groups i.e., Group A and Group B with the help of non-probability convenience sampling. Both groups had received conventional Physiotherapy interventions (Stretching, Manual therapy, exercise therapy and home exercise plane.) along with specific techniques. The patients in group A had received Instrument assisted soft tissue mobilization (IASTM) and patients in group B had received treatment with kinesiology taping. The total duration of study was about 4 weeks. The patients had received 3 sessions per week for a period of 4 weeks and the outcomes were evaluated at baseline (first session), second assessment at the end of 2nd week and 3rd assessment at the end of 4th week. Only obese patients aged between 25-65 years were included in the study and were assessed upon the scoring of foot function index. Data will be analysed with the help of SPSS version 21.
Publications & conference data
No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial. Completed trials usually publish results within 12-18 months.
Verify or expand the search:
- PubMed search for NCT05475899
- Europe PMC full search
- ASCO Meeting Library
- ESMO Meeting Library
- bioRxiv preprints
- medRxiv preprints
- Google Scholar
Related trials
Other trials of Instrument assisted soft tissue mobilization
Trials testing the same drug.
- NCT07070245 — Comparing Instrument Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization With Positional Release Technique for Plantar Fasciitis Pain and · NA · enrolling by invitation
- NCT06796881 — Instrument Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization Versus Myofascial Release in Patients With Chronic Non¬Specific Low Back Pa · NA · recruiting
- NCT06603714 — Effects of Soft Tissue Mobilization at Different Muscle Lengths · NA · enrolling by invitation
- NCT07007442 — Instrument Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization Versus Dry Cupping On Chronic Mechanical Neck Pain · NA · completed
- NCT06406023 — Effectiveness of Instrument Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization in Management of Piriformis Syndrome · NA · recruiting
Other recruiting trials for Plantar Fascitis
Currently open trials in the same condition.
- NCT07055698 — Responsiveness And Minimal Clinically Important Difference Of Navicular Height Drop Test With Plantar Fasciitis · active not recruiting
- NCT07037290 — Ankle Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation Technique Versus Foot Core Exercise in Patients With Plantar Fascitis · NA · active not recruiting
- NCT06536803 — Effects of High Load Strength Training With and Without Tissue Specific Planter Facia Stretching With Planter Fasciitis · NA · recruiting
- NCT06706531 — Additional Effects of Dry Needling With Conventional Physical Therapy Versus Conventional Physical Therapy in Plantar Fa · NA · recruiting
- NCT06466616 — Shock Waves Therapy Combined With Leg Stretching in Patients With Plantar Fasciitis · NA · active not recruiting
Other Riphah International University trials
Trials by the same sponsor.
- NCT07579585 — Effects of Photobiomodulation in Hemophilia Patients. · NA · recruiting
- NCT07504276 — Tele-Rehabilitation vs Conventional Rehabilitation for Cognitive Improvement in Stroke Survivors. · NA · recruiting
- NCT07484477 — Sedentary Behavior Modification, Cardiopulmonary Function & QOL Post Cardiac Surgery Patients. · NA · not yet recruiting
- NCT07438587 — Comparative Effects of Cadence Training vs Elliptical Training in Cricketers · NA · not yet recruiting
- NCT07484399 — Comparing Effects of HIIT and MICT on Functional Mobility, Muscle Strength, and Quality of Life in Diabetic Patients · NA · not yet recruiting
Verify against primary sources
- ClinicalTrials.gov — authoritative US registry record
- WHO ICTRP — international registry index
- EU Clinical Trials Register
- Sponsor press releases (Google)
- Trial protocol + status: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05475899 (US National Library of Medicine, public domain)
- Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
- Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by Riphah International University
- Last refreshed: 27 July 2022
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT05475899.
Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing