Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT05467163: CONDUCT-AF

Conduction System Pacing Versus Biventricular Pacing After Atrioventricular Node Ablation

Recruiting now NA Last updated 15 April 2025
What this trial tests

NA trial testing Biventricular pacemaker implantation in Heart Failure in 82 participants. Currently enrolling.

Timeline
18 July 2023
Primary endpoint
25 December 2025
25 December 2026

Quick facts

Lead sponsorUniversity Medical Centre Ljubljana
PhaseNA
StatusRecruiting now
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designparallel
Maskingnone
Primary purposetreatment
Enrollment82
Start date18 July 2023
Primary completion25 December 2025
Estimated completion25 December 2026
Sites10 locations across Belgium, Austria, Hungary, Romania, Slovenia, Bulgaria, Croatia

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

University Medical Centre Ljubljana

Who can join

Adults 18 to 85, any sex, with Heart Failure or Tachycardia-induced Cardiomyopathy. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Sponsor's own description

Atrioventricular node ablation (AVNA) with biventricular (BiV) pacemaker implantation is a feasible treatment option in patients with symptomatic refractory atrial fibrillation and heart failure. However, conduction system pacing (CSP) modalities, including His bundle pacing and left bundle branch pacing, could offer advantages over BiV pacing by providing more physiological activation. The randomized, interventional, multicentric study will explore whether CSP is non-inferior to BiV pacing in echocardiographic and clinical outcomes in heart failure (EF \<50%) patients with symptomatic AF and narrow QRS scheduled for AVNA.

Publications & conference data

5 peer-reviewed publications reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):

  1. Current Role of Conduction System Pacing in Patients Requiring Permanent Pacing.
    Beer D, Vijayaraman P. · · 2024 · cited 4× · PMID 38859643 · DOI 10.4070/kcj.2024.0113
  2. Paradigm Shifts in Cardiac Pacing: Where Have We Been and What Lies Ahead?
    Ballantyne BA, Chew DS, Vandenberk B. · · 2023 · cited 3× · PMID 37109274 · DOI 10.3390/jcm12082938
  3. Is Conduction System Pacing a Valuable Alternative to Biventricular Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy?
    Castagno D, Zanon F, Pastore G, De Ferrari GM, et al · · 2024 · cited 2× · PMID 38786966 · DOI 10.3390/jcdd11050144
  4. The CONDUCT-AF trial: Rationale and design of a prospective, randomized, multicentre study comparing conduction system and biventricular pacing in patients undergoing atrioventricular node ablation for heart failure with atrial fibrillation.
    Ivanovski M, Mrak M, Mežnar AZ, Jan M, et al · · 2025 · cited 1× · PMID 40920457 · DOI 10.1002/ejhf.70013
  5. Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy and Conduction System Pacing.
    O'Neill TG, Tsushima T, Tayal B. · · 2025 · cited 1× · PMID 40364243 · DOI 10.3390/jcm14093212

Verify or expand the search:

Other recruiting trials for Heart Failure

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other University Medical Centre Ljubljana trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT05467163.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing