Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT05462418

Diathermy vs Scalpel in Abdominal Incision in Women Undergoing CS

Status unknown NA Last updated 18 July 2022
What this trial tests

NA trial testing electrosurgery in Incision, Surgical in 300 participants. Status unknown.

Timeline
15 July 2022
Primary endpoint
15 January 2023
15 February 2023

Quick facts

Lead sponsorCairo University
PhaseNA
StatusStatus unknown
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designparallel
Maskingdouble
Primary purposesupportive care
Enrollment300
Start date15 July 2022
Primary completion15 January 2023
Estimated completion15 February 2023
Sites1 location across Egypt

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Cairo University

Who can join

Adults 20 to 40, female only, with Incision, Surgical. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Sponsor's own description

Cesarean section is surging worldwide. For an extended period of surgical practice, the scalpel has been well-known as a gold-standard tool for making surgical incisions. The diathermy, electrocautery, is a substitute.

Publications & conference data

No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial.

Verify or expand the search:

Other Cairo University trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT05462418.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing