Who is sponsoring NCT05436067?

NCT05436067 is sponsored by CFD Research Corporation.

What drugs are being tested in NCT05436067?

Interventions in NCT05436067: Vestibular rehabilitation app, Traditional Physical Therapy.

What condition does NCT05436067 study?

NCT05436067 studies Vestibular Disorder, Balance; Distorted, Vestibular Diseases.

Is NCT05436067 still recruiting?

NCT05436067 is currently completed. Last updated 24 April 2025.

Are results published for NCT05436067?

Yes — primary outcome results have been posted to ClinicalTrials.gov. See the outcomes section above for details.

Last reviewed 2025-04-24 · How we verify

NCT05436067

Name: Drug Landscape Pharmaceutical Database
Creator: Drug Landscape
Published: 2026-01-01
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Individualized Vestibular Rehabilitation for Elderly With Self-Management and Gaming Elements

Completed NA Results posted Last updated 24 April 2025

What this trial tests

NA trial testing Vestibular rehabilitation app in Vestibular Disorder in 40 participants. Completed in 13 January 2023.

Timeline

23 May 2022

Primary endpoint
13 January 2023

13 January 2023

Quick facts

Lead sponsor	CFD Research Corporation
Phase	NA
Status	Completed
Study type	INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation	randomized
Design	single group
Masking	none
Primary purpose	other
Enrollment	40
Start date	23 May 2022
Primary completion	13 January 2023
Estimated completion	13 January 2023
Sites	1 location across United States

Drugs / interventions tested

Vestibular rehabilitation app
Traditional Physical Therapy

Conditions studied

Vestibular Disorder — all drugs for Vestibular Disorder →
Balance; Distorted — all drugs for Balance; Distorted →
Vestibular Diseases — all drugs for Vestibular Diseases →

Sponsor

CFD Research Corporation

Who can join

Adults 60 to 75, any sex, with Vestibular Disorder or Balance; Distorted. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.

Perceived Usefulness Primary · Immediately after the testing

The ease of use of information technology questionnaire is used to rate usefulness and perceived ease of use of the Vestibular Rehabilitation app. These are rated on a scale of 1-7, with 1 being the most positive response, 4 being a neutral response and 7 being the most negative response.

Group	Value	95% CI
Older Adults With Dizziness	1.99	± 1.00

User Interface Satisfaction Questionnaire Outcomes Primary · Immediately after the testing

The questionnaire for user interface satisfaction (QUIS) is used to rate the Vestibular Rehabilitation app on use of its software and screen. These are rated on a scale of 0-9, with 9 being the most positive response and 0 being the most negative response.

Group	Value	95% CI
Older Adults With Dizziness	7.59	± 1.70

Use Intention, Motivation and Enjoyment Primary · Immediately after the testing

A questionnaire on use intention, motivation, and enjoyment is used to rate the Vestibular Rehabilitation app on the use intention, motivation and enjoyment of the app. These are rated on a scale of 1-7, with 1 being the most positive response, 4 being a neutral response and 7 being the most negative response.

Group	Value	95% CI
Older Adults With Dizziness	1.90	± 1.13

Change in Head Angle With the App Primary · During the testing with the app and during the testing without the app (up to 90 minutes)

The IMU sensor data collected during the exercise performance with and without the Vestibular Rehabilitation App (collected in the same lab visit on the same group of participants) were analyzed to calculate peak head angles. These were analyzed to identify differences for the conditions with and without the Vestibular Rehabilitation App.

Peak pitch angle - left

Group	Value	95% CI
Trials With the Vestibular Rehabilitation App	13.2	± 6.9
Trials Without the Vestibular Rehabilitation App	22.0	± 8.3

Peak pitch angle - right

Group	Value	95% CI
Trials With the Vestibular Rehabilitation App	13.8	± 7.8
Trials Without the Vestibular Rehabilitation App	21.4	± 8.2

Peak yaw angle - flexion

Group	Value	95% CI
Trials With the Vestibular Rehabilitation App	13.6	± 6.0
Trials Without the Vestibular Rehabilitation App	16.0	± 13.2

Peak yaw angle - extension

Group	Value	95% CI
Trials With the Vestibular Rehabilitation App	14.7	± 5.7
Trials Without the Vestibular Rehabilitation App	16.5	± 10.8

Change in Range of Motion With the App Primary · During the testing with the app and during the testing without the app (up to 90 minutes)

The IMU sensor data collected during the exercise performance with and without the Vestibular Rehabilitation App (collected in the same lab visit on the same group of participants) were analyzed to calculate head range of motion values. These were analyzed to identify differences for the conditions with and without the Vestibular Rehabilitation App

Range of motion - yaw

Group	Value	95% CI
Trials With the Vestibular Rehabilitation App	14.1	± 5.3
Trials Without Vestibular Rehabilitation App	16.6	± 7.0

Range of motion - pitch

Group	Value	95% CI
Trials With the Vestibular Rehabilitation App	13.6	± 7.0
Trials Without Vestibular Rehabilitation App	22.9	± 9.7

Change in Head Motion Frequency With the App Primary · During the testing with the app and during the testing without the app (up to 90 minutes)

The IMU sensor data collected during the exercise performance with and without the Vestibular Rehabilitation App (collected in the same lab visit on the same group of participants) were analyzed to calculate frequency of head motion. These were analyzed to identify differences for the conditions (arms) with and without the Vestibular Rehabilitation App

Pitch frequency

Group	Value	95% CI
Trials With the Vestibular Rehabilitation App	0.93	± 0.1
Trials Without the Vestibular Rehabilitation App	0.93	± 0.27

Yaw frequency

Group	Value	95% CI
Trials With the Vestibular Rehabilitation App	0.93	± 0.13
Trials Without the Vestibular Rehabilitation App	0.85	± 0.27

Change in Balance Outcome With the App - Weight Shift Exercise Primary · During the testing with the app and during the testing without the app (up to 90 minutes)

The IMU sensor data collected during the exercise performance with and without the Vestibular Rehabilitation App (collected in the same lab visit on the same group of participants) were analyzed to calculate range of motion in different directions during the weight shift balance exercise (in degrees). These were analyzed to identify differences for the conditions with and without the Vestibular Rehabilitation App

Weight shift exercise - mediolateral range of motion

Group	Value	95% CI
Trials With the Vestibular Rehabilitation App	8.7	± 3.5
Trials Without the Vestibular Rehabilitation App	7.2	± 3.5

Weight shift exercise - anterioposterior range of motion

Group	Value	95% CI
Trials With the Vestibular Rehabilitation App	4.5	± 1.6
Trials Without the Vestibular Rehabilitation App	3.7	± 1.7

Single leg balance - range of motion

Group	Value	95% CI
Trials With the Vestibular Rehabilitation App	8.8	± 4.8
Trials Without the Vestibular Rehabilitation App	11.0	± 6.8

Open Ended Feedback Secondary · Immediately after the intervention

Participants will be asked for open ended feedback after the testing with and without the Vestibular Rehabilitation App. Discussions will be guided with questions. The questions were as follows: 1) Describe your overall experience as you used the app today?; 2) Explain the positive features of the app as you did your exercises?; 3) Describe the negative features of the app as you did your exercises today?; 4) What changes would you like to see in the app to support you as you do your exercises?; 5) Do you see any barriers to using the app while doing your exercises at home?

Overall experience - not challenging

Group	Value	95% CI
Trials With Vestibular Rehabilitation App	1
Trials Without Vestibular Rehabilitation App	0

Overall experience - positive or fun

Group	Value	95% CI
Trials With Vestibular Rehabilitation App	30
Trials Without Vestibular Rehabilitation App	0

Overall experience - easy or easy to understand

Group	Value	95% CI
Trials With Vestibular Rehabilitation App	11
Trials Without Vestibular Rehabilitation App	0

Overall experience - engaging or interesting

Group	Value	95% CI
Trials With Vestibular Rehabilitation App	6
Trials Without Vestibular Rehabilitation App	0

Overall experience - motivating

Group	Value	95% CI
Trials With Vestibular Rehabilitation App	9
Trials Without Vestibular Rehabilitation App	0

Overall experience - difficult

Group	Value	95% CI
Trials With Vestibular Rehabilitation App	1
Trials Without Vestibular Rehabilitation App	0

Overall experience - seems geared toward more younger adults

Group	Value	95% CI
Trials With Vestibular Rehabilitation App	5
Trials Without Vestibular Rehabilitation App	0

Overall experience - not motivating

Group	Value	95% CI
Trials With Vestibular Rehabilitation App	2
Trials Without Vestibular Rehabilitation App	0

Change in Balance Outcome With the App - Single Leg Balance Primary · During the testing with the app and during the testing without the app (up to 90 minutes)

The IMU sensor data collected during the exercise performance with and without the Vestibular Rehabilitation App (collected in the same lab visit on the same group of participants) were analyzed to calculate balance measure fluency (a non-dimensional derivative of jerk). This was analyzed to identify differences for the conditions with and without the Vestibular Rehabilitation App

Group	Value	95% CI
Trials With the Vestibular Rehabilitation App	0.28	± 0.07
Trials Without the Vestibular Rehabilitation App	0.30	± 0.07

Sponsor's own description

The aim of this study is to test whether when using the Vestibular Rehabilitation App older patients perform rehabilitation in a similar manner as when directly instructed by a clinician. A secondary goal is to evaluate usability and enjoyment of the app.

Publications & conference data

1 peer-reviewed publication reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):

A gaming app developed for vestibular rehabilitation improves the accuracy of performance and engagement with exercises.
D'Silva LJ, Phongsavath T, Partington K, Pickle NT, et al · · 2023 · cited 3× · PMID 38076248 · DOI 10.3389/fmed.2023.1269874

Verify or expand the search:

Other recruiting trials for Vestibular Disorder

Currently open trials in the same condition.

NCT06688578 — Testing Effectiveness of a Stochastic Noise Stimulator to Immediately Improve Balance and Gait · NA · recruiting
NCT05942781 — Concurrent Vestibular Activation and Postural Training Using Virtual Reality · NA · active not recruiting
NCT03799991 — Vestibular Therapy in Alzheimer's Disease · NA · recruiting
NCT05622344 — StableEyes With Active Neurofeedback · NA · recruiting
NCT05414903 — Reading Outcomes in Children With Vestibular Loss · NA · recruiting

Verify against primary sources

ClinicalTrials.gov — authoritative US registry record
WHO ICTRP — international registry index
EU Clinical Trials Register
Sponsor press releases (Google)

Data sources for this page

Trial protocol + status: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05436067 (US National Library of Medicine, public domain)
Publications: Europe PMC API search by NCT ID, retrieved 10 June 2026
Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by CFD Research Corporation
Last refreshed: 24 April 2025

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT05436067.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing