Adults 18 to 99, any sex, with Unilateral Deafness. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
Speech Intelligibility in Noise Measured With US Matrix Test (Noise From a Defined Loudspeaker)Primary· At the appointment following the 4 weeks home trial each participant went on wearing the BiCROS fitting
Measuring the Signal to Noise Ratio change in decibels (dB) for speech from the front loudspeaker and noise from the better ear's side with the US matrix Test. Results of the speech test will be the SRT (speech recognition threshold) in dB SNR (signal to noise ratio).
The target speaker will be presented from 0° azimuth and is adaptive (start level at 65dB (A)).
The noise will be presented on the better ear at an azimuth of 90° or 270° (depending on the site of the better ear), at a level of 65 dB (A).
Group
Value
95% CI
BiCROS With Beamformer
-8.8
± 3.4
BiCROS Omni
-3.7
± 2.9
Monaural With Beamformer
-9.2
± 2.7
Monaural Omni
-2.8
± 2.5
Unaided
-0.1
± 6.8
Speech Intelligibility in Noise Measured With US Matrix Test (Diffuse Noise)Secondary· At the appointment following the 4 weeks home trial each participant went on wearing the BiCROS fitting
Measuring the Signal to Noise Ratio change in decibels (dB) for speech from the front loudspeaker in surrounding noise with the US Matrix Test. Results of the speech test will be the SRT (speech recognition threshold) in dB SNR (signal to noise ratio).
The target speaker will be presented from 0° azimuth and is adaptive (start level at 65dB (A).
The noise will be presented from a circle of 8 surrounding speakers from 45° to 315° at a level of 65 dB (A) with the participant seated in the centre of the circle.
Group
Value
95% CI
BiCROS With Beamformer
-14.2
± 3.3
BiCROS Omni
-8
± 4.2
Monaural With Beamformer
-13.9
± 3.6
Monaural Omni
-9.3
± 3
Unaided
-3.4
± 9.4
Reports of Subjective Quality of Hearing as Assessed by the SSQSecondary· At the appointment following the 4 weeks home trial each participant went on wearing the BiCROS fitting
Measured after home trial with the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale-Benefit (Gatehouse, 2004). The scale ranges from -5 to 5, where negative values indicate that the condition under test is worse than the comparator, 0 indicates no change, and positive values indicate a benefit of the condition under test compared to the comparator.
Speech
Group
Value
95% CI
BiCROS
2.48
± 0.59
Spatial
Group
Value
95% CI
BiCROS
1.16
± 0.47
Qualities
Group
Value
95% CI
BiCROS
2.55
± 0.35
Reports of Subjective Quality of Hearing as Assessed by the Bern Benefit QuestionnairesSecondary· At the appointment following the 4 weeks home trial each participant went on wearing the BiCROS fitting
Measured after home trial with the Bern Benefit in Single-Sided Deafness Questionnaire (Komps et al, 2011). The scale ranges from -5 to 5, where negative values indicate that the condition under test is better wihtout the hearing aid, 0 indicates no change, and positive values indicate a benefit with the hearing aid.
Group
Value
95% CI
BiCROS
2.83
± 0.76
Sound Quality Ratings for Total Impression and Clarity Using Gabriellson et al (1990) Ratings ScalesSecondary· At the appointment following the 4 weeks home trial each participant went on wearing the BiCROS fitting
Ratings of speech in noise presented via loudspeakers using Gabriellson et al (1990) Ratings Scales. Scales include Clarity and Total Impression, and range from 1 to 10. The higher the rating, the better the Clarity and Total Impression.
Clarity
Group
Value
95% CI
BiCROS With Beamformer
6.8
± 2.4
BiCROS Omni
5.2
± 2.8
Monaural With Beamformer
6.5
± 2.3
Monaural Omni
4.8
± 2.8
Unaided
3.7
± 3
Total Impression
Group
Value
95% CI
BiCROS With Beamformer
6.1
± 2.7
BiCROS Omni
4.7
± 2.8
Monaural With Beamformer
6
± 2.3
Monaural Omni
4.3
± 2.5
Unaided
3.7
± 2.6
Subjective Preference of Hearing Aid ConditionSecondary· At the appointment following the 4 weeks home trial each participant went on wearing the BiCROS fitting
3 alternative forced choice (A, B, no preference or ABX) paradigm with three repetitions for speech in noise presented via loudsepakers
Group
Value
95% CI
BiCROS w/ Beamformer vs. Monaural w/ Beamformer
7
BiCROS Omni vs. Monaural Omni
11
BiCROS Omni vs. w/ Beamformer
2
Monaural Omni vs. w/ Beamformer
4
BiCROS w/ Beamformer vs. Monaural w/ Beamformer
6
BiCROS Omni vs. Monaural Omni
3
BiCROS Omni vs. w/ Beamformer
0
Monaural Omni vs. w/ Beamformer
0
BiCROS w/ Beamformer vs. Monaural w/ Beamformer
5
BiCROS Omni vs. Monaural Omni
4
BiCROS Omni vs. w/ Beamformer
0
Monaural Omni vs. w/ Beamformer
0
BiCROS w/ Beamformer vs. Monaural w/ Beamformer
0
BiCROS Omni vs. Monaural Omni
0
BiCROS Omni vs. w/ Beamformer
16
Monaural Omni vs. w/ Beamformer
14
Listening Effort in Noise Using 7 Point Scale (Holmes et. al., 2018)Secondary· At the appointment following the 4 weeks home trial each participant went on wearing the BiCROS fitting
Measuring listening effort for speech in multi-talker babble presented via loudspeaker. The scale ranges from 1 to 7, and a higher rating indicates less listening effort.
Group
Value
95% CI
BiCROS With Beamformer
3.75
± 1.8
BiCROS Omni
4.9
± 1.9
Monaural With Beamformer
3.9
± 1.6
Monaural Omni
5
± 1.5
Unaided
5.7
± 1.8
Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Time frame: From the first appointment the participant was enrolled and assessed, until the last appointment that concluded the home trial and study participation. The whole duration was about 5-6 weeks per participant..
Reporting threshold: 0%.
Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.
22 candidates for BiCROS hearing aids will be recruited and fitted with a hearing aid and a CROS device. Following a real-world trial, each participant will be tested on a range of outcome measures including speech recognition in noise, ratings of listening effort, and ratings of preference.
Publications & conference data
No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial. Completed trials usually publish results within 12-18 months.
NCT05775367 — Cochlear Implants in Young Children With SSD
· NA
· recruiting
NCT05435612 — Evaluation of Rehabilitation Results in the Single-sided Deafness With Cochlear Implantation
· NA
· recruiting
NCT04793412 — Cochlear Implantation in Children With Asymmetric Hearing Loss or Single-Sided Deafness Clinical Trial
· NA
· active not recruiting
Other Sonova AG trials
Trials by the same sponsor.
NCT07526428 — Investigating the DNN Noise Reduction Feature in Phonak Hearing Aids Using Ecological Momentary Assessment
· NA
· enrolling by invitation
NCT07501312 — Remote Microphone Performance Comparison in Adults With Hearing Loss
· NA
· enrolling by invitation
NCT07414329 — Efficacy and Effectiveness of an Investigational Behind-the-Ear Hearing Device Kit
· NA
· recruiting
NCT06957730 — A Comparison of Hearing Aid Noise Programs on Speech Intelligibility
· NA
· completed
NCT06746038 — Evaluation of Extended Wear Hearing Aid for Mild Hearing Loss
· NA
· not yet recruiting
Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by Sonova AG
Last refreshed: 11 June 2025
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT05379231.