Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT05376241

Promoting Informed Choice for Breast Cancer Screening

Completed Phase 2 Results posted Last updated 27 March 2026
What this trial tests

Phase 2 trial testing Decision aid in Breast Cancer in 637 participants. Completed in 7 May 2022.

Timeline
3 January 2022
Primary endpoint
7 May 2022
7 May 2022

Quick facts

Lead sponsorUniversity of Colorado, Denver
PhasePhase 2
StatusCompleted
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationna
Designsingle group
Maskingnone
Primary purposehealth services research
Enrollment637
Start date3 January 2022
Primary completion7 May 2022
Estimated completion7 May 2022
Sites1 location across United States

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

University of Colorado, Denver

Who can join

Adults 39 to 49, female only, with Breast Cancer. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.

Reactance Primary · 24 hours

In response to mammography evidence, feeling that the information is manipulative or biased. 4 questions total, each on a 7 point Likert scale, with mean scores that range from 1 to 5. Higher mean scores reflect greater reactance.

Response to screening benefits
GroupValue95% CI
Women Age 39-49 in the United States2.28± 0.71
Response to false positives
GroupValue95% CI
Women Age 39-49 in the United States2.45± 0.75
Response to overdiagnosis
GroupValue95% CI
Women Age 39-49 in the United States2.55± 0.80
Disbelief Primary · 24 hours

In response to mammography evidence, feeling that the evidence is not accurate or believable. 4 questions total, each on a 5 point Likert scale, with mean scores that range from 1 to 5. Higher mean score reflects more disbelief in the information.

Response to screening benefits
GroupValue95% CI
Women Age 39-49 in the United States2.06± 0.61
Response to false positives
GroupValue95% CI
Women Age 39-49 in the United States2.32± 0.63
Response to overdiagnosis
GroupValue95% CI
Women Age 39-49 in the United States2.41± 0.68
Source Derogation Primary · 24 hours

In response to mammography evidence, feeling that the source of the evidence is not trustworthy or competent. 4 questions total, each on a 5 point Likert scale, with mean scores that range from 1 to 5. Higher mean score reflects more source derogation.

GroupValue95% CI
Women Age 39-49 in the United States2.56± 0.09
Self Exemption Primary · 24 hours

Feeling that mammography evidence is not relevant to oneself.34 questions total, each on a 5 point Likert scale, with mean scores that range from 1 to 5. Higher mean scores indicate greater belief that the information is not self relevant.

Response to screening benefits
GroupValue95% CI
Women Age 39-49 in the United States2.20± 0.70
Response to false positives
GroupValue95% CI
Women Age 39-49 in the United States2.21± 0.71
Response to overdiagnosis
GroupValue95% CI
Women Age 39-49 in the United States2.32± 0.72
Screening Intentions Primary · 24 hours

Intentions to engage in mammography screening. Options will include: 1. I am planning to start/continue having regular mammograms this year. 2. I am planning to wait until I'm older but before age 50 to have my first/next mammogram. 3. I am planning to wait until I am 50 to have my first/next mammogram. 4. I am not planning to have a mammogram in the future at any age

Have regular mammograms at current age
GroupValue95% CI
Women Age 39-49 in the United States286
Wait until older but before age 50
GroupValue95% CI
Women Age 39-49 in the United States100
Wait until age 50
GroupValue95% CI
Women Age 39-49 in the United States88
never have a mammogram
GroupValue95% CI
Women Age 39-49 in the United States21
Medical Mistrust Scale (Eaton et al., 2015) Secondary · 24 hours

6 question scale that assesses mistrust in healthcare providers. Calculated as mean trust (range 1-low trust to 5-high trust). Assessed both pre and post receipt of screening decision aid to evaluate change

Pre-DA trust
GroupValue95% CI
Women Age 39-49 in the United States3.11± 0.69
Post-DA trust
GroupValue95% CI
Women Age 39-49 in the United States3.02± 0.65

Sponsor's own description

Identify the prevalence and predictors of reactance, self-exemption, disbelief, source derogation in reaction to evidence about mammography benefits and harms, and consequences for decision-making and trust.

Publications & conference data

2 peer-reviewed publications reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):

  1. Mammography Screening Preferences Among Screening-Eligible Women in Their 40s : A National U.S. Survey.
    Scherer LD, Lewis CL, McCaffery K, Hersch J, et al · · 2024 · cited 10× · PMID 39008858 · DOI 10.7326/m23-3325
  2. Skeptical reactions to breast cancer screening benefits and harms: Antecedents, consequences, and implications for screening communication.
    Scherer LD, Lewis CL, Cappella JN, Hersch J, et al · · 2025 · cited 1× · PMID 39585772 · DOI 10.1037/hea0001442

Verify or expand the search:

Other trials of Decision aid

Trials testing the same drug.

Other recruiting trials for Breast Cancer

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other University of Colorado, Denver trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT05376241.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing