Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT05359952

Women's Health Communication Study

Completed NA Results posted Last updated 25 September 2024
What this trial tests

NA trial testing Starting the Conversation in Gynecologic Cancer in 32 participants. Completed in 22 August 2022.

Timeline
9 February 2022
Primary endpoint
22 August 2022
22 August 2022

Quick facts

Lead sponsorFox Chase Cancer Center
PhaseNA
StatusCompleted
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designparallel
Maskingnone
Primary purposesupportive care
Enrollment32
Start date9 February 2022
Primary completion22 August 2022
Estimated completion22 August 2022
Sites1 location across United States

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Fox Chase Cancer Center — full company profile →

Who can join

18 and older, female only, with Gynecologic Cancer. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.

Feasibility - Enrollment Primary · Baseline

Study enrollment, defined as the number of participants randomized out of the number of eligible patients approached for participation

GroupValue95% CI
Study Candidates32
Feasibility - Retention Primary · 2 months

Number of enrolled participants that complete the final study survey.

GroupValue95% CI
Starting the Conversation20
Sexual and Menopausal Health Resources Only11
Feasibility - Intervention Completion Primary · 2 weeks

Number of participants randomized to receive the Starting the Conversation intervention who report having engaged at least somewhat with the video and/or accompanying workbook.

GroupValue95% CI
Starting the Conversation21
Starting the Conversation0
Acceptability Primary · 2 weeks

The number of participants randomized to receive the Starting the Conversation intervention who endorse at least 6 of 8 core components of the Starting the Conversation Intervention (defined as satisfaction with the intervention, informativeness of the intervention, helpfulness of the intervention, relevance of the intervention, ease of participation, approval of the intervention format, likelihood of recommending the intervention to others, and perceived importance of the intervention for people with gynecologic cancer).

GroupValue95% CI
Starting the Conversation20
Self-Efficacy - Post-Intervention Secondary · 2 weeks

Patients' confidence that they can discuss sexual concerns with their provider and ask their provider about sexual concerns. Scale ranges from 0-10, with higher scores indicating higher self-efficacy. Means will be reported.

GroupValue95% CI
Starting the Conversation8.186.99 – 9.35
Sexual and Menopausal Health Resources Only9.188.15 – 10.22
Self-Efficacy - 2-Month Follow Up Secondary · 2 months

Patients' confidence that they can discuss sexual concerns with their provider and ask their provider about sexual concerns. Scale ranges from 0-10, with higher scores indicating higher self-efficacy. Means will be reported.

GroupValue95% CI
Starting the Conversation8.006.59 – 9.41
Sexual and Menopausal Health Resources Only8.687.21 – 10.16
Clinical Communication - Discussion of Sexual Health Secondary · 2 weeks

Number of patients who discuss sexual health concerns in a clinic visit.

GroupValue95% CI
Starting the Conversation9
Sexual and Menopausal Health Resources Only5
Clinical Communication - Raising Topic of Sexual Health Secondary · 2 weeks

Number of patients who raise the topic of sexual health concerns in a clinic visit.

GroupValue95% CI
Starting the Conversation7
Sexual and Menopausal Health Resources Only0
Clinical Communication - Asking a Question About Sexual Health Secondary · 2 weeks

Number of patients who ask a question about sexual health concerns in a clinic visit.

GroupValue95% CI
Starting the Conversation9
Sexual and Menopausal Health Resources Only3
Change in Sexual Function Secondary · baseline to 2 months

Patients' self-reported sexual function will be measured using the 19-item Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI).Total scale scores range from 2 to 36, with higher scores indicating higher functioning. Positive mean change scores indicate increase in sexual functioning over time while negative mean change scores indicate decrease in sexual functioning over time.

GroupValue95% CI
Starting the Conversation1.3± 3.9
Sexual and Menopausal Health Resources Only4.5± 9.0
Sexual Activity Secondary · 2 months

A single item asking (yes/no) whether the participant had any kind of sexual activity in the past 30 days. Percent reporting sexual activity is reported.

GroupValue95% CI
Starting the Conversation10
Sexual and Menopausal Health Resources Only4
Psychological Distress - Depression Secondary · 2 months

Patients self-reported depression, as measured through depression subscale of the Hospital Anxiety \& Depression Scale (HADS). The depression subscale consists of 7 items that are scored from 0 to 3. Summed scores range from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating higher levels of depression. Means will be reported.

GroupValue95% CI
Starting the Conversation5.43.45 – 7.35
Sexual and Menopausal Health Resources Only4.552.15 – 6.94

Sponsor's own description

The central goal of this randomized, controlled pilot study is to examine the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effects of an educational intervention (called "Starting the Conversation"; STC) on patient communication about sexual health in gynecologic cancer and other patient health outcomes. Approximately 30 women with a diagnosis of gynecologic cancer will be randomized to either participate in either the Starting the Conversation (STC) condition, consisting of an educational video, workbook, and list of resources on sexual and menopausal health, or to a control condition offering the resource guide only. Patients will be asked to review intervention materials prior to their next clinic visit with their gynecologic cancer provider. The investigators will examine effects of the interventions on patients' beliefs about communication about sexual health and on patients' communication about sexual health during clinic visits with their providers. Secondarily, the investigators will examine effects of the interventions on sexual outcomes and other health outcomes, including psychological well-being.

Publications & conference data

1 peer-reviewed publication reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):

  1. Starting the Conversation: randomized pilot trial of an intervention to promote effective clinical communication about sexual health for gynecologic cancer survivors.
    Reese JB, Bober SL, Sorice KA, Handorf E, et al · · 2024 · cited 3× · PMID 36604391 · DOI 10.1007/s11764-022-01327-4

Verify or expand the search:

Other trials of Starting the Conversation

Trials testing the same drug.

Other recruiting trials for Gynecologic Cancer

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other Fox Chase Cancer Center trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT05359952.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing