Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT05316597

Do Terpenes Play a Role in the Stress-reducing Effects of a Forest Bathing Intervention?

Completed NA Results posted Last updated 19 September 2024
What this trial tests

NA trial testing Forest bathing in Monoterpene Exposure During a Forest Bathing Intervention in 43 participants. Completed in 21 September 2023.

Timeline
12 July 2022
Primary endpoint
21 September 2023
21 September 2023

Quick facts

Lead sponsorUniversity of Washington
PhaseNA
StatusCompleted
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designcrossover
Maskingdouble
Primary purposeprevention
Enrollment43
Start date12 July 2022
Primary completion21 September 2023
Estimated completion21 September 2023
Sites1 location across United States

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

University of Washington

Who can join

18 and older, any sex, with Monoterpene Exposure During a Forest Bathing Intervention. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.

Changes in the HF (ms^2) Component of HRV Primary · At time point 2 (20 minutes into duration of exposure for Session 1 and Session 2 (which occurred at least 8 days after Session 1)).

Assess whether VOC inhalation regulates psychophysiological outcomes of the terpenes-on vs. terpenes-off sessions. Ln High Frequency Heart Rate Variability at T2 (20 minutes into duration of exposure for each session)

GroupValue95% CI
Terpenes On6.65± 1.33
Terpenes Off6.48± 1.14
Blood Pressure (Diastolic in mmHg) Secondary · At time point 4 (60 minutes into duration of exposure for Session 1 and Session 2 (which occurred at least 8 days after Session 1)).

Assessed using mobile physiology equipment Diastolic blood pressure at T4 (60 minutes of exposure)

GroupValue95% CI
Terpenes On75.4± 9.86
Terpenes Off73.2± 11.1
Beats Per Minute (BPM) Secondary · At time point 4 (60 minutes into duration of exposure for Session 1 and Session 2 (which occurred at least 8 days after Session 1)).

Assessed using mobile physiology equipment BPM at time point 4 (60 minutes of exposure)

GroupValue95% CI
Terpenes On61.4± 11.9
Terpenes Off63.0± 13.7
Skin Conductance (μS) Secondary · At time point 2 (20 minutes into duration of exposure for Session 1 and Session 2 (which occurred at least 8 days after Session 1)).

Assessed using mobile physiology equipment Skin conductance levels at time point 2 (20 minutes into exposure)

GroupValue95% CI
Terpenes On3.28± 3.76
Terpenes Off4.14± 5.94
Self-reported Positive Affect Secondary · At time point 2 (20 minutes into duration of exposure for Session 1 and Session 2 (which occurred at least 8 days after Session 1)).

Assessed using the shortened Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) Positive affect at time point 2 (20 minutes of exposure) Higher scale scores are indicative of better outcome Range 5-50

GroupValue95% CI
Terpenes On12.1± 4.00
Terpenes Off11.3± 4.38
Self-reported Stress Secondary · At time point 2 (20 minutes into duration of exposure for Session 1 and Session 2 (which occurred at least 8 days after Session 1)).

Assessed using a single-item self report non-validated scale Self-reported stress at time point 2 (20 minutes of exposure) Higher scale score indicative of worse outcome Range 1-5

GroupValue95% CI
Terpenes On1.09± 0.390
Terpenes Off1.17± 0.447
Self-reported Negative Affect Secondary · At time point 2 (20 minutes into duration of exposure for Session 1 and Session 2 (which occurred at least 8 days after Session 1)).

Assessed using the shortened Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) Negative affect at time point 2 (20 minutes of exposure) Higher score on scale indicative of worse outcome Range 5-50

GroupValue95% CI
Terpenes On5.13± 0.421
Terpenes Off5.31± 0.749
Levels of CRP Secondary · At time point 4 (60 minutes into duration of exposure for Session 1 and Session 2 (which occurred at least 8 days after Session 1)).

Assessed using blood serum collected via standard clinical methods. CRP levels at time point 4 (60 minutes of exposure).

GroupValue95% CI
Terpenes On9.99± 7.83
Terpenes Off13.4± 12.5
Levels of Cortisol in Serum (ng/mL) Secondary · At time point 4 (60 minutes into duration of exposure for Session 1 and Session 2 (which occurred at least 8 days after Session 1)).

Assessed using blood serum collected via standard clinical methods Cortisol levels at time point 4 (60 minutes of exposure).

GroupValue95% CI
Terpenes On98.6± 43.6
Terpenes Off109.0± 60.0
Blood Pressure (Systolic in mmHg) Secondary · At time point 4 (60 minutes into duration of exposure for Session 1 and Session 2 (which occurred at least 8 days after Session 1)).

Assessed using mobile physiology equipment Systolic blood pressure at T4 (60 minutes of exposure)

GroupValue95% CI
Terpenes On123± 16.9
Terpenes Off121± 14.0
Level of TNF-alpha Secondary · At time point 4 (60 minutes into duration of exposure for Session 1 and Session 2 (which occurred at least 8 days after Session 1)).

Assessed using blood serum collected via standard clinical methods TNF-alpha levels at time point 4 (60 minutes of exposure).

GroupValue95% CI
Terpenes On3.80± 2.71
Terpenes Off4.27± 2.84
Levels of Il-6 Secondary · At time point 4 (60 minutes into duration of exposure for Session 1 and Session 2 (which occurred at least 8 days after Session 1)).

Assessed using blood serum collected via standard clinical methods IL-6 levels at time point 4 (60 minutes of exposure).

GroupValue95% CI
Terpenes On0.547± 0.609
Terpenes Off0.763± 0.820

Sponsor's own description

This pilot study evaluates the role terpenes play in the stress-reducing effects of a forest bathing intervention. Participants will participate in two interventions in random order: 1) terpene exposure and 2) no terpene exposure.

Publications & conference data

1 peer-reviewed publication reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):

  1. Forest terpenes and stress: Examining the associations of filtered vs. non-filtered air in a real-life natural environment.
    Levy CM, Riederer AM, Simpson CD, Gassett AJ, et al · · 2025 · cited 1× · PMID 40147520 · DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2025.121482

Verify or expand the search:

Other trials of Forest bathing

Trials testing the same drug.

Other University of Washington trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT05316597.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing