Last reviewed 2023-05-09 · How we verify
Home › Trials › NCT05313412
NCT05313412
Clinical Evaluation of Two Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lenses
On this page:
Summary Quick facts Who can join Endpoints Results Related trials Sources
Completed
NA
Results posted
Last updated 9 May 2023
What this trial tests
NA trial testing Lens A (comfilcon A lens) in Myopia in 38 participants. Completed in 21 April 2022.
Timeline
27 January 2022
Primary endpoint 21 April 2022
21 April 2022
Quick facts
Lead sponsor CooperVision, Inc.
Phase NA
Status Completed
Study type INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation randomized
Design crossover
Masking double
Primary purpose treatment
Enrollment 38
Start date 27 January 2022
Primary completion 21 April 2022
Estimated completion 21 April 2022
Sites 1 location across United Kingdom
Drugs / interventions tested
Lens A (comfilcon A lens) Lens B (lehfilcon A lens)
Conditions studied
Myopia — all drugs for Myopia →
Sponsor
CooperVision, Inc.
Who can join
Adults 18 to 40, any sex, with Myopia. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
Ease of Lens Insertion
Primary
· 6 hours
Ease of Lens Insertion is measured on a scale of 0-100 (0-Unmanageable, Lenses impossible to insert; 100-Excellent. No problems with lens insertion)
Group Value 95% CI Lens A 92.1 ± 10.3 Lens B 90.9 ± 17.4
Sponsor's own description
This study is to compare the short-term clinical performance and subjective acceptance of two silicone hydrogel soft contact lenses.
Publications & conference data
No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial. Completed trials usually publish results within 12-18 months.
Verify or expand the search:
Other trials of Lens A (comfilcon A lens)
Trials testing the same drug.
NCT05166902 — Evaluation of Monthly Replacement Lenses in Habitual Soft Contact Lens Wearers Who Report Frequent Digital Devise Use
· NA
· completed
NCT05114564 — Evaluation of the Performance of Monthly Replacement Sphere Lens Designs in Habitual Soft Contact Lens Wearers
· NA
· completed
Other recruiting trials for Myopia
Currently open trials in the same condition.
NCT07284966 — Comfort and Vision With TOTAL30 Multifocal Lenses
· recruiting
NCT07078799 — Wavefront-guided LASIK Surgery Compared to Ray Tracing-Guided LASIK Surgery
· NA
· recruiting
NCT07585877 — Effect of Branched-Chain Amino Acid Supplementation on Myopia Progression
· NA
· active not recruiting
NCT07354945 — An Evaluation of Myopia Control Lenses on Wearing Experience in Myopic Children
· NA
· recruiting
NCT07229365 — Children's Viewing Behavior
· NA
· recruiting
Other CooperVision, Inc. trials
Trials by the same sponsor.
NCT06817785 — Soft Lens Study: Biomedics 1 Day Extra Sphere and Clariti 1 Day Sphere
· NA
· completed
NCT06758076 — A Clinical Comparison of Two Soft Contact Lenses (C24-755)
· NA
· completed
NCT06590441 — Investigation of Wearing Compliance of Spectacles for Myopia Control
· completed
NCT06609018 — Clinical Investigation of Buttermere (LENS 271) Soft Contact Lenses
· NA
· completed
NCT06611410 — 1 Week Crossover Study Between Two Soft Contact Lenses
· NA
· completed
Verify against primary sources
Data sources for this page
Trial protocol + status : ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05313412 (US National Library of Medicine, public domain)
Drug + disease cross-links : matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
Sponsor : as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by CooperVision, Inc.
Last refreshed : 9 May 2023
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT05313412.
Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing
Not medical advice. Information on this page is collated from primary regulatory and clinical-trial sources for research purposes. It is not a substitute for consultation with a licensed healthcare professional. See our editorial policy for sourcing and methodology.