22 and older, any sex, with Lung Neoplasms. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
Number of Patients Whose Ablation Resulted in Technique EfficacyPrimary· 30 days post-ablation
Technique Efficacy is defined as ablation of the target tumor(s) with the ablation zone completely overlapping or encompassing the entire target tumor(s) as assessed using CT imaging 30 days (- 7 to +14 days) after the ablation procedure.
Group
Value
95% CI
Transbronchial Microwave Ablation
11
Number of Patients Whose Ablation Resulted in Technical SuccessSecondary· Immediately post-ablation (Day 0)
Technical Success is defined as ablation of the target lesion(s) according to the protocol and covered completely, with an adequate margin (that is, the ablation zone completely overlaps or encompasses the target lesion plus an ablative margin), as assessed by the performing physician using CBCT imaging, immediately following the procedure.
Group
Value
95% CI
Transbronchial Microwave Ablation
12
Number of Patients Who Experienced Local Tumor ProgressionSecondary· Assessed at 3 months, 6 months and 1 year post-ablation
Local Tumor Progression, or recurrence of the originally ablated tumor(s) within or abutting the ablation zone, using the 30 day post-ablation imaging as baseline, was analyzed at 3 months, 6 months and 1 year post-ablation via CT imaging
Group
Value
95% CI
Transbronchial Microwave Ablation
11
Number of Patients Who Experienced Disease ProgressionSecondary· Assessed at 3 months, 6 months and 1 year post-ablation
Disease Progression includes local tumor progression (that is, recurrence of the target ablated tumor within or abutting the ablation zone) and regional tumor progression (that is, new or progression of non-ablated pre-existing tumors within the lung but outside the ablation zone) and distant tumor progression. Results for each category (local, regional, and distant tumor progression) are specified, as well as Overall Disease Progression. Disease Progression was analyzed at 3 months, 6 months and 1 year post-ablation via CT imaging as per treating physician assessment
Overall Disease Progression
Group
Value
95% CI
Transbronchial Microwave Ablation
3
Local Tumor Progression
Group
Value
95% CI
Transbronchial Microwave Ablation
0
Regional Tumor Progression
Group
Value
95% CI
Transbronchial Microwave Ablation
3
Distant Tumor Progression
Group
Value
95% CI
Transbronchial Microwave Ablation
2
Number of Patients Who Required Repeat Ablation of Target LesionSecondary· Assessed at 3 months, 6 months and 1 year post-ablation
Number of patients that experienced a recurrence of the successfully ablated target lesion, as assessed at Day 30 post-ablation, and underwent a repeat ablation of the target Lesion
Group
Value
95% CI
Transbronchial Microwave Ablation
0
Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Time frame: 1 year following the initial ablation procedure..
Reporting threshold: 2%.
Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.
This is a prospective, multicenter, single-arm study on transbronchial microwave ablation using the NEUWAVE FLEX Microwave Ablation System and Accessories on oligometastatic tumors in the peripheral lung, guided by the Auris MONARCH Platform for visualization and access while using cone beam CT (computed tomography) to confirm probe tip placement and final ablation zone. The primary endpoint is Technique Efficacy, assessed 30-days post-ablation via CT imaging.
Publications & conference data
5 peer-reviewed publications reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):
NCT07476287 — Symbiotic-Lung-14: A Study to Learn About the Study Medicine Called PF08634404 in Combination With Chemotherapy in Adult
· Phase 2
· recruiting
NCT07509333 — MDT-Based Umbrella Decision Model for Geriatric Lung Cancer Patients
· NA
· recruiting
NCT07109154 — DeniLA: Comprehensive Demographics and Clinical Profile of NSCLC Patients: Analyzing Guideline-Concordant Care in First-
· recruiting
Publications: Europe PMC API search by NCT ID, retrieved 10 June 2026
Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by Ethicon, Inc.
Last refreshed: 24 November 2025
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT05299606.