Confidence in the COVID-19 vaccines, assessed using the 3-item Vaccine Confidence Index (Larson et al., 2016) adapted for COVID-19. Each item is rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 ('Strongly disagree') to 5 ('Strongly agree'). Respondents are considered 'confident' (score of '1') if they respond 'Agree' or 'Strongly agree' on all three items and 'not confident' (score of '0') if one or more item responses is not 'Agree' or 'Strongly agree'.
Group
Value
95% CI
Dialogue-Based Webinar
93
Social Media Website
106
Enhanced Usual Practice
138
Change From Baseline to 3 Weeks Post-randomization in COVID-19 Vaccine ConfidenceSecondary· Baseline (Time 0); 3 weeks post-randomization (Time 1)
Change in confidence in the COVID-19 vaccines from baseline to 3 weeks post-randomization, assessed using the 3-item Vaccine Confidence Index (Larson et al., 2016) adapted for COVID-19. Each item is rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 ('Strongly disagree') to 5 ('Strongly agree'). Respondents are considered 'confident' (score of '1') if they respond 'Agree' or 'Strongly agree' on all three items and 'not confident' (score of '0') if one or more item responses is not 'Agree' or 'Strongly agree'. For the change from baseline to Time 1 outcome, a score of 1 represents an increase in vaccine c
Group
Value
95% CI
Dialogue-Based Webinar
42
Social Media Website
49
Enhanced Usual Practice
62
Change From Baseline to 3 Months Post-randomization in COVID-19 Vaccine ConfidenceSecondary· Baseline (Time 0); 3 months post-randomization (Time 2)
Change in confidence in the COVID-19 vaccines from baseline to 3 months post-randomization, assessed using the 3-item Vaccine Confidence Index (Larson et al., 2016) adapted for COVID-19. Each item is rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 ('Strongly disagree') to 5 ('Strongly agree'). Respondents are considered 'confident' (score of '1') if they respond 'Agree' or 'Strongly agree' on all three items and 'not confident' (score of '0') if one or more item responses is not 'Agree' or 'Strongly agree'. For the change from baseline to Time 2 outcome, a score of 1 represents an increase in vaccine
Group
Value
95% CI
Dialogue-Based Webinar
57
Social Media Website
58
Enhanced Usual Practice
55
Change From Baseline to 6 Months Post-randomization in COVID-19 Vaccine ConfidenceSecondary· Baseline (Time 0); 6 months post-randomization (Time 3)
Change in confidence in the COVID-19 vaccines from baseline to 6 months post-randomization, assessed using the 3-item Vaccine Confidence Index (Larson et al., 2016) adapted for COVID-19. Each item is rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 ('Strongly disagree') to 5 ('Strongly agree'). Respondents are considered 'confident' (score of '1') if they respond 'Agree' or 'Strongly agree' on all three items and 'not confident' (score of '0') if one or more item responses is not 'Agree' or 'Strongly agree'. For the change from baseline to Time 3 outcome, a score of 1 represents an increase in vaccine
Group
Value
95% CI
Dialogue-Based Webinar
52
Social Media Website
66
Enhanced Usual Practice
62
Net Promoter Score (COVID-19 Vaccination)Secondary· 3 weeks post-randomization (Time 1)
Likelihood of recommending COVID-19 vaccination to someone who is not vaccinated, assessed using a single-item adapted Net Promoter Score item. The item is assessed on an 11-point scale ranging from 0 ('No at all likely') to 10 ('Extremely likely'). Responses are categorized into three groups: Promoters (scale score of 9 or 10) receive a score of '1', passives (scale score of 7 or 8) receive a score of '0', and detractors (scale score of 0-6) receive a score of '-1'.
Group
Value
95% CI
Dialogue-Based Webinar
-0.48
± 0.04
Social Media Website
-0.52
± 0.03
Enhanced Usual Practice
-0.42
± 0.04
Net Promoter Score (COVID-19 Booster Vaccination to Coworker)Secondary· 3 weeks post-randomization (Time 1)
Likelihood of recommending COVID-19 booster vaccination to a coworker, assessed using a single-item adapted Net Promoter Score item. The item is assessed on an 11-point scale ranging from 0 ('No at all likely') to 10 ('Extremely likely'). Responses are categorized into three groups: Promoters (scale score of 9 or 10) receive a score of '1', passives (scale score of 7 or 8) receive a score of '0', and detractors (scale score of 0-6) receive a score of '-1'.
Intent to get a COVID-19 vaccine if unvaccinated, assessed using a single item with multiple choice (single answer) format. Response options are Yes (score of '1'), Not Sure (score of '0'), and No (score of '-1').
Intent to get a COVID-19 booster vaccine if not yet received, assessed using a single item with multiple choice (single answer) format. Response options are Yes (score of '1'), Not Sure (score of '0'), and No (score of '-1').
Intent to get COVID-19 vaccines regularly in the future if they are recommended, assessed using a single item with multiple choice (single answer) format. Response options are Yes (score of '1'), Not Sure (score of '0'), and No (score of '-1').
Group
Value
95% CI
Dialogue-Based Webinar
-0.16
± 0.04
Social Media Website
-0.17
± 0.04
Enhanced Usual Practice
-0.09
± 0.04
Sponsor's own description
The CONFIDENT Study is an online three-arm randomized trial that aims to help long-term care workers in the United States feel more confident about the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines. The study will compare two different interventions to usual online information (website of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention). The first intervention is a Dialogue-Based Webinar where people can interact and ask questions about the vaccines. The second intervention is a Social Media Website that will feature curated content about the vaccines from popular social media platforms.
Participants will be asked to completed four online surveys. The first survey will be completed pre-intervention and immediately upon study enrollment (Time 0). Participants will be randomized to a trial arm at the end of the Time 0 survey. Intervention follow-up surveys will be completed 3 weeks post-randomization (Time 1), three months post-randomization (Time 2), and 6 months post-randomization (Time 3).
Publications & conference data
4 peer-reviewed publications reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):
NCT07183709 — Safety and Immunogenicity Trial of PepGNP-COVID19 Vaccine in Adults
· Phase 1
· active not recruiting
NCT07300839 — A Study to Learn About a COVID-19 Vaccine in Healthy Adults 50 Through 64 Years of Age
· Phase 3
· active not recruiting
NCT07221162 — A Safety and Immunogenicity Trial of Boost-2867 Vaccine, Via Intranasal and Intramuscular Routes
· Phase 1
· recruiting
NCT07215520 — Safety and Tolerability of a Newcastle Disease Virus-Based Mucosal COVID-19 Vaccine in Previously Vaccinated Adults
· Phase 2
· recruiting
NCT07222384 — A Study to Learn About BNT162b2 (LP.8.1)-Adapted Vaccine Against SARS-CoV-2 in Children 5 Through 11 Years of Age That A
· Phase 3
· active not recruiting
Other Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center trials
Trials by the same sponsor.
NCT07325474 — Plan and Protect: Safety Planning for Teens in Rural Emergency Departments
· NA
· not yet recruiting
NCT07428629 — Piloting an Insomnia Treatment in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis
· NA
· not yet recruiting
NCT06777511 — Advancing Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy to Prevent Infection in Osseointegrated Prosthesis Patients
· not yet recruiting
NCT07279116 — ABY-029 Head & Neck Trial
· Phase 1
· not yet recruiting
Publications: Europe PMC API search by NCT ID, retrieved 10 June 2026
Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
Last refreshed: 5 August 2025
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT05168800.