Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT05134714

"Evaluation of Clinical Performance and Success Rate of CAD/CAM Versus Conventional Band and Loop Space Maintainer"

Status unknown NA Last updated 31 January 2024
What this trial tests

NA trial testing CAD/CAM zircon band and loop space maintainer in CAD/CAM Space Maintainer in 18 participants. Status unknown.

Timeline
1 June 2024
Primary endpoint
1 November 2024
1 December 2024

Quick facts

Lead sponsorAin Shams University
PhaseNA
StatusStatus unknown
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designparallel
Maskingdouble
Primary purposetreatment
Enrollment18
Start date1 June 2024
Primary completion1 November 2024
Estimated completion1 December 2024

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Ain Shams University

Who can join

Adults 4 to 7, any sex, with CAD/CAM Space Maintainer. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Sponsor's own description

This study is to evaluate and compare CAD/CAM zircon space maintainer and conventional metal of band and loop space maintainers in terms of plaque deposits and gingival health and, the success rate of the appliances in terms of: survival time, cement loss and appliance breakage. And to compare both appliances in terms of patient satisfaction. This study consists of two parts: in vivo part (split mouth RCT) and in vitro part: In vivo study: Its sample size was found to be (36) cases (i.e. 18 case per group). Sample size calculation was performed using G\*Power version 3.1.9.7 Sample size will be increased by about 10% to compensate for the drop-out. In this in vivo study split mouth will be randomly divided into two groups: Group 1: Conventional metal band and loop space maintainer Group 2: CAD/CAM zircon band and loop space maintainer In vitro study: its sample size was found to be (24) samples (i.e. 8 samples per group). Sample size calculation was performed using G\*Power version 3.1.9.7 Sample size will be increased by about 10% to compensate for the drop-out. Grouping: The zirconia specimen divided randomly into three groups according to type of cements: Group 1: Self-adhesive resin cement Group 2: Resin-modified glass ionomer cement Group 3: Universal bioactive cement

Publications & conference data

No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial.

Verify or expand the search:

Other Ain Shams University trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT05134714.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing