16 and older, any sex, with Cognitive Change. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
Site-determined Cognitive Changes Per DomainPrimary· At least six months from baseline assessment. Subjects were analyzed even if they only had 1 test performed. The baseline test information can still be used even if they didn't have follow up testing done.
Neuropsychological test data collected will describe cognitive domain specific changes as a cohort. Change will be assessed from raw test scores and demographically corrected standardized scores (where available). For this study, collected cognitive domains include Language (Boston Naming Test), Executive Function (Trails Making Test), Attention (Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale 3 Digital Span Test), Verbal Memory (Logical Memory Test), Visual Memory (Brief Visiospacial Memory Test), Verbal Fluency (Animal Fluency Test), and Motor Function (Grooved Pegboard Test).
Boston Naming (range 13-60. Higher score is better)
Group
Value
95% CI
PENSAR Subjects Baseline
49
± 9.7
PENSAR Subjects Follow-Up
50.7
± 6.6
Trails Making (range 16-291. Higher value is worse)
Group
Value
95% CI
PENSAR Subjects Baseline
32.9
± 15.4
PENSAR Subjects Follow-Up
35.3
± 27.7
Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale 3 Digital Span (range 2-58. Lower score is better)
Group
Value
95% CI
PENSAR Subjects Baseline
13.1
± 6.1
PENSAR Subjects Follow-Up
14.6
± 9.8
Logical Memory (range 0-32. Higher score is better)
Group
Value
95% CI
PENSAR Subjects Baseline
22.3
± 6.0
PENSAR Subjects Follow-Up
18.9
± 6.5
Brief Visuospacial Memory Test (range 0-33. Higher score is better)
Group
Value
95% CI
PENSAR Subjects Baseline
20.1
± 7.3
PENSAR Subjects Follow-Up
18.8
± 8.3
Animal Fluency (range 7-30. Higher score is better)
Group
Value
95% CI
PENSAR Subjects Baseline
16.9
± 4.4
PENSAR Subjects Follow-Up
15.5
± 5.6
Grooved Pegboard (Range 49-243. Lower score is better)
Group
Value
95% CI
PENSAR Subjects Baseline
78.0
± 20.7
PENSAR Subjects Follow-Up
77.2
± 19.1
Change in Raw Test Scores From Standard Battery of Preferred Neuropsychological TestsSecondary· At least six months from baseline assessment.Subjects were analyzed even if they only had 1 test performed. The baseline test information can still be used even if they didn't have follow up testing done.
Describe the observed change or stability of neuropsychological test scores in patients who underwent laser ablation surgery. Change will be assessed from raw test scores and demographically corrected standardized scores (where available). For this study, tests include Boston Naming, Trails making Test A and Test B, Digit Span, Logical memory test (subtest from Wechsler Memory Scale IV), BVMT--Brief Visuospatial Memory Test, Animal Fluency test, and Grooved Pegboard.
Number of subjects who saw no change or improvement in Boston Naming Test
Group
Value
95% CI
PENSAR Subjects
25
Number of subjects who saw no change or improvement in Trails Making Test
Group
Value
95% CI
PENSAR Subjects
24
Number of subjects with no change or improvement in Wechsler Adult Intelligence 3 Digital Span Test
Group
Value
95% CI
PENSAR Subjects
30
Number of subjects who saw no change or improvement in Logical Memory Test
Group
Value
95% CI
PENSAR Subjects
19
Number of subjects who saw no change or improvement in Brief Visiospatial Memory Test
Group
Value
95% CI
PENSAR Subjects
29
Number of subjects who saw no change or improvement in Animal Fluency Test
Group
Value
95% CI
PENSAR Subjects
23
Number of subjects who saw no change or improvement in Grooved Pegboard Test
Group
Value
95% CI
PENSAR Subjects
29
Sponsor's own description
PatiEnt Neuropsychological outcomeS After laseR ablation
Publications & conference data
1 peer-reviewed publication reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):
Publications: Europe PMC API search by NCT ID, retrieved 10 June 2026
Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by Monteris Medical
Last refreshed: 6 April 2025
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT05075850.