Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT05056870

Clinical Evaluation of Spherical Soft Contact Lenses, Toric Soft Contact Lenses and Spectacles in Low Astigmats

Completed NA Results posted Last updated 27 April 2023
What this trial tests

NA trial testing ACUVUE Oasys 1-Day with HydraLuxe Technology for Astigmatism in Visual Acuity in 174 participants. Completed in 3 March 2022.

Timeline
15 September 2021
Primary endpoint
3 March 2022
3 March 2022

Quick facts

Lead sponsorJohnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.
PhaseNA
StatusCompleted
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designcrossover
Maskingsingle
Primary purposetreatment
Enrollment174
Start date15 September 2021
Primary completion3 March 2022
Estimated completion3 March 2022
Sites13 locations across United States

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. — full company profile →

Who can join

Adults 18 to 39, any sex, with Visual Acuity. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.

High Luminance High Contrast Monocular Visual Acuity (LogMAR) Primary · 1-Week Follow-up

Visual Acuity was collected for each subject eye at distance (4 meter) using a Logarithm of Minimal Angle of Resolution (logMAR) visual acuity scale. This was evaluated under high luminance and high contrast conditions (HLHC) at 4 meters from Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) charts at the 1-week follow-up visit. A value of 0.0 logMAR is equivalent to 20/20 Snellen Visual Acuity. Lower values of visual acuity indicate better vision. The average logMAR Visual Acuity was reported for each lens type.

GroupValue95% CI
Test (AO1DfA)-0.126± 0.0798
Control (AO1D)-0.028± 0.1123
CLUE Vision Score Secondary · 1-Week Follow-up

CLUE Vision Score was assessed using the Contact Lens User Experience™ (CLUE) questionnaire. CLUE is a validated patient-reported outcomes (PRO) questionnaire to assess patient-experience attributes of soft contact lenses (comfort, vision, handling, and packaging) in a contact-lens wearing population in the US, ages 18-65. Derived CLUE scores using Item Response Theory (IRT) follow a normal distribution with a population average score of 60 (SD 20), where higher scores indicate a more favorable/positive response with a range of 0-120. The average CLUE vision score for each lens type was report

GroupValue95% CI
Test (AO1DfA)69.39± 20.151
Control (AO1D)41.49± 28.139
High Luminance High Contrast Monocular Visual Acuity (LogMAR) Secondary · 1-Week Follow-up

Visual Acuity was collected for each subject eye at distance (4 meter) using a Logarithm of Minimal Angle of Resolution (logMAR) visual acuity scale. This was evaluated under high luminance and high contrast conditions (HLHC) at 4 meters from Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) charts at the 1-week follow-up visit. A value of 0.0 logMAR is equivalent to 20/20 Snellen Visual Acuity. Lower values of visual acuity indicate better vision. The average logMAR Visual Acuity was reported for each lens type. Data summaries for the Control lens are reported for the first primary measure o

GroupValue95% CI
Test (AO1DfA)-0.128± 0.0799
Spectacles-0.107± 0.0812
Subjective Contact Lens Preference Secondary · 1-Week Follow-up
Prefer Test
GroupValue95% CI
Total0.689
Prefer Control
GroupValue95% CI
Total0.225
No Preference
GroupValue95% CI
Total0.086

Sponsor's own description

This will be a 5-visit, randomized, partially single-masked, bilateral wear, dispensing, 2-treatment × 2-period crossover study with spectacle-wear washout and wash-in periods.

Publications & conference data

No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial. Completed trials usually publish results within 12-18 months.

Verify or expand the search:

Other recruiting trials for Visual Acuity

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT05056870.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing