18 and older, any sex, with Scar-related Atrial Tachycardia or Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) Within 7 Days of Index Procedure Related to the OPTRELL CatheterPrimary· Up to 7 days of index procedure at Day 0
Number of participants with SAEs within 7 days of index procedure related to the OPTRELL catheter were reported. An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant whether or not related to the investigational device. SAE is any AE that results in: death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, is life-threatening experience, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect and may jeopardize participant and/or may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed ab
Group
Value
95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter
0
Number of Participants With Pre-ablation Mapping and Clinically Indicated Mapping Performed With the OPTRELL Catheter Without Resort to Other Mapping CathetersPrimary· Up to 72 days
Number of participants with pre-ablation mapping and clinically indicated mapping performed with the OPTRELL catheter without resort to other mapping catheters were reported.
Group
Value
95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter
31
Number of Participants With SAEs Within 7 Days of Index ProcedureSecondary· Up to 7 days of index procedure at Day 0
Number of participants with SAEs within 7 days of index procedure were reported. An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant whether or not related to the investigational device. SAE is any AE that results in: death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, is life-threatening experience, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect and may jeopardize participant and/or may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above.
Group
Value
95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter
3
Number of Participants With Non-serious Adverse Events Within 7 Days of Index Procedure Associated With the Use of the OPTRELL CatheterSecondary· Up to 7 days of index procedure at Day 0
Number of participants with non-serious adverse events within 7 days of index procedure associated with the use of the OPTRELL catheter were reported. An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant participating in a clinical study that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the pharmaceutical/biological agent under study.
Group
Value
95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter
0
Number of Responders for Physician Assessment for Maneuverability & HandlingSecondary· Up to 72 days
Number of responders for physician assessment for maneuverability \& handling were reported. A post-procedure survey of 11 questions, each with individual sub-questions were asked. Each question/sub-question was answered by the physician using a Likert scale of 1 to 7 (1=poor and 7=excellent). Responders refers to participants with physician assessment for maneuverability \& handling.
Ability to Deploy (Left Atrium): Score 1
Group
Value
95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter
0
Ability to Deploy (Left Atrium): Score 2
Group
Value
95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter
0
Ability to Deploy (Left Atrium): Score 3
Group
Value
95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter
0
Ability to Deploy (Left Atrium): Score 4
Group
Value
95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter
0
Ability to Deploy (Left Atrium): Score 5
Group
Value
95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter
0
Ability to Deploy (Left Atrium): Score 6
Group
Value
95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter
6
Ability to Deploy (Left Atrium): Score 7
Group
Value
95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter
17
Ability to Deploy (Right Atrium): Score 1
Group
Value
95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter
0
Number of Responders for Physician Assessment for Signal Collection and QualitySecondary· Up to 72 days
Number of responders for physician assessment for signal collection and quality were reported. A post-procedure survey of 11 questions, each with individual sub-questions were asked. Each question/sub-question was answered by the physician using a Likert scale of 1 to 7 (1=poor and 7=excellent). Responders refers to participants with physician assessment for signal collection and quality
UNIPOLAR signals in Atrium: Score 1
Group
Value
95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter
0
UNIPOLAR signals in Atrium: Score 2
Group
Value
95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter
0
UNIPOLAR signals in Atrium: Score 3
Group
Value
95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter
0
UNIPOLAR signals in Atrium: Score 4
Group
Value
95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter
0
UNIPOLAR signals in Atrium: Score 5
Group
Value
95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter
1
UNIPOLAR signals in Atrium: Score 6
Group
Value
95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter
4
UNIPOLAR signals in Atrium: Score 7
Group
Value
95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter
2
UNIPOLAR signals in Ventricle: Score 1
Group
Value
95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter
0
Number of Responders for Physician Assessment for PacingSecondary· Up to 72 days
Number of responders for physician assessment for pacing (local pacing capture) were reported. A post-procedure survey of 11 questions, each with individual sub-questions were asked. Each question/sub-question was answered by the physician using a Likert scale of 1 to 7 (1=poor and 7=excellent). Responders refers to participants with physician assessment for pacing.
Local pacing capture: Score 1
Group
Value
95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter
0
Local pacing capture: Score 2
Group
Value
95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter
0
Local pacing capture: Score 3
Group
Value
95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter
1
Local pacing capture: Score 4
Group
Value
95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter
1
Local pacing capture: Score 5
Group
Value
95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter
2
Local pacing capture: Score 6
Group
Value
95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter
2
Local pacing capture: Score 7
Group
Value
95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter
3
Number of Responders for Physician Assessment for Catheter Design in OPTRELL Catheter for MappingSecondary· Up to 72 days
Number of responders for physician assessment for catheter design were reported. A post-procedure survey of 11 questions, each with individual sub-questions were asked. Each question/sub-question was answered by the physician using a Likert scale of 1 to 7 (1=poor and 7=excellent). Responders refers to participants with physician assessment for catheter design in OPTRELL catheter for mapping.
Ability to achieve electrode contact with cardiac tissue: Score 1
Group
Value
95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter
0
Ability to achieve electrode contact with cardiac tissue: Score 2
Group
Value
95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter
1
Ability to achieve electrode contact with cardiac tissue: Score 3
Group
Value
95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter
0
Ability to achieve electrode contact with cardiac tissue: Score 4
Group
Value
95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter
2
Ability to achieve electrode contact with cardiac tissue: Score 5
Group
Value
95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter
2
Ability to achieve electrode contact with cardiac tissue: Score 6
Group
Value
95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter
18
Ability to achieve electrode contact with cardiac tissue: Score 7
Group
Value
95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter
8
Electrodes spacing: Score 1
Group
Value
95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter
0
Number of Responders for Physician Assessment for WorkflowSecondary· Up to 72 days
Number of responders for physician assessment for workflow were reported. A post-procedure survey of 11 questions, each with individual sub-questions were asked. Each question/sub-question was answered by the physician using a Likert scale of 1 to 7 (1=poor and 7=excellent). Responders refers to participants with physician assessment for workflow.
Ability to reduce fluoroscopy: Score 1
Group
Value
95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter
0
Ability to reduce fluoroscopy: Score 2
Group
Value
95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter
0
Ability to reduce fluoroscopy: Score 3
Group
Value
95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter
0
Ability to reduce fluoroscopy: Score 4
Group
Value
95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter
10
Ability to reduce fluoroscopy: Score 5
Group
Value
95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter
6
Ability to reduce fluoroscopy: Score 6
Group
Value
95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter
10
Ability to reduce fluoroscopy: Score 7
Group
Value
95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter
5
Time for pre-procedure mapping: Score 1
Group
Value
95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter
0
Number of Responders for Physician Assessment for Catheter VisualizationSecondary· Up to 72 days
Number of responders for physician assessment for catheter visualization were reported. A post-procedure survey of 11 questions, each with individual sub-questions were asked. Each question/sub-question was answered by the physician using a Likert scale of 1 to 7 (1=poor and 7=excellent). Responders refers to participants with physician assessment for catheter visualization.
Visualization under fluoroscopy: Score 1
Group
Value
95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter
0
Visualization under fluoroscopy: Score 2
Group
Value
95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter
0
Visualization under fluoroscopy: Score 3
Group
Value
95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter
0
Visualization under fluoroscopy: Score 4
Group
Value
95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter
0
Visualization under fluoroscopy: Score 5
Group
Value
95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter
7
Visualization under fluoroscopy: Score 6
Group
Value
95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter
9
Visualization under fluoroscopy: Score 7
Group
Value
95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter
15
Visualization in CARTO 3: Score 1
Group
Value
95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter
0
Number of Responders for Physician Assessment for Catheters InteractionsSecondary· Up to 72 days
Number of responders for physician assessment for catheters interactions were reported. A post-procedure survey of 11 questions, each with individual sub-questions were asked. Each question/sub-question was answered by the physician using a Likert scale of 1 to 7 (1=poor and 7=excellent). Responders refers to participants with physician assessment for catheters interactions.
With CARTO 3 System: Score 1
Group
Value
95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter
0
With CARTO 3 System: Score 2
Group
Value
95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter
0
With CARTO 3 System: Score 3
Group
Value
95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter
0
With CARTO 3 System: Score 4
Group
Value
95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter
0
With CARTO 3 System: Score 5
Group
Value
95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter
4
With CARTO 3 System: Score 6
Group
Value
95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter
12
With CARTO 3 System: Score 7
Group
Value
95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter
15
EP Lab recording equipment: Score 1
Group
Value
95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter
0
Number of Responders for Physician Assessment for ArrhythmogenicitySecondary· Up to 72 days
Number of responders with physician assessment for arrhythmogenicity were reported. A post-procedure survey of 11 questions, each with individual sub-questions were asked. Each question/sub-question was answered by the physician using a Likert scale of 1 to 7 (1=poor and 7=excellent). Responders refers to participants with physician assessment for arrhythmogenicity.
Compared to the PENTARAY catheter?: Score 1
Group
Value
95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter
0
Compared to the PENTARAY catheter?: Score 2
Group
Value
95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter
0
Compared to the PENTARAY catheter?: Score 3
Group
Value
95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter
0
Compared to the PENTARAY catheter?: Score 4
Group
Value
95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter
2
Compared to the PENTARAY catheter?: Score 5
Group
Value
95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter
5
Compared to the PENTARAY catheter?: Score 6
Group
Value
95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter
10
Compared to the PENTARAY catheter?: Score 7
Group
Value
95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter
14
Compared to other competitive multielectrode catheters?: Score 1
Group
Value
95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter
0
Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Time frame: Up to 72 days.
Reporting threshold: 0%.
Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.
The purpose of this study is to assess the performance and safety for the use of the OPTRELL Catheter for intracardiac mapping in the atria and ventricles.
Publications & conference data
1 peer-reviewed publication reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):
Other recruiting trials for Scar-related Atrial Tachycardia
Currently open trials in the same condition.
NCT07116525 — A Study Assessing Arrhythmia Mapping With a Multi-Electrode Mapping Catheter
· NA
· recruiting
Other Biosense Webster, Inc. trials
Trials by the same sponsor.
NCT07527299 — A Study of VARIPULSE Catheter in Participants With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Pulmonary Vein and Superior
· NA
· not yet recruiting
NCT07523750 — A Study of VARIPULSE Pulsed Field Ablation (PFA) Catheter and FARAWAVE PFA Catheter in the Treatment of Participants Wit
· NA
· not yet recruiting
NCT07429214 — A Study of VARIPULSE Catheter and TRUPULSE Generator With VARIPULSE Pro Software in Participants With PAF or PsAF
· NA
· recruiting
NCT07428564 — A Study of VARIPULSE Catheter and TRUPULSE Generator With VARIPULSE PRO Software in Participants With PsAF
· NA
· not yet recruiting
NCT07227532 — A Study Assessing Long-Term Safety and Effectiveness in Treatment Management of Atrial Fibrillation With VARIPULSE Cathe
· NA
· recruiting
Publications: Europe PMC API search by NCT ID, retrieved 10 June 2026
Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by Biosense Webster, Inc.
Last refreshed: 3 July 2023
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT04983797.