Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT04983797: OPTIMUM

A Study Assessing Arrhythmia Mapping With the Multi-Electrode OPTRELL™ Mapping Catheter

Completed NA Results posted Last updated 3 July 2023
What this trial tests

NA trial testing OPTRELL Mapping Catheter in Scar-related Atrial Tachycardia in 31 participants. Completed in 4 November 2021.

Timeline
25 August 2021
Primary endpoint
4 November 2021
4 November 2021

Quick facts

Lead sponsorBiosense Webster, Inc.
PhaseNA
StatusCompleted
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationna
Designsingle group
Maskingnone
Primary purposeother
Enrollment31
Start date25 August 2021
Primary completion4 November 2021
Estimated completion4 November 2021
Sites3 locations across Belgium, Lithuania

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Biosense Webster, Inc. — full company profile →

Who can join

18 and older, any sex, with Scar-related Atrial Tachycardia or Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.

Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) Within 7 Days of Index Procedure Related to the OPTRELL Catheter Primary · Up to 7 days of index procedure at Day 0

Number of participants with SAEs within 7 days of index procedure related to the OPTRELL catheter were reported. An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant whether or not related to the investigational device. SAE is any AE that results in: death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, is life-threatening experience, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect and may jeopardize participant and/or may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed ab

GroupValue95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter0
Number of Participants With Pre-ablation Mapping and Clinically Indicated Mapping Performed With the OPTRELL Catheter Without Resort to Other Mapping Catheters Primary · Up to 72 days

Number of participants with pre-ablation mapping and clinically indicated mapping performed with the OPTRELL catheter without resort to other mapping catheters were reported.

GroupValue95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter31
Number of Participants With SAEs Within 7 Days of Index Procedure Secondary · Up to 7 days of index procedure at Day 0

Number of participants with SAEs within 7 days of index procedure were reported. An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant whether or not related to the investigational device. SAE is any AE that results in: death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, is life-threatening experience, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect and may jeopardize participant and/or may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above.

GroupValue95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter3
Number of Participants With Non-serious Adverse Events Within 7 Days of Index Procedure Associated With the Use of the OPTRELL Catheter Secondary · Up to 7 days of index procedure at Day 0

Number of participants with non-serious adverse events within 7 days of index procedure associated with the use of the OPTRELL catheter were reported. An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant participating in a clinical study that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the pharmaceutical/biological agent under study.

GroupValue95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter0
Number of Responders for Physician Assessment for Maneuverability & Handling Secondary · Up to 72 days

Number of responders for physician assessment for maneuverability \& handling were reported. A post-procedure survey of 11 questions, each with individual sub-questions were asked. Each question/sub-question was answered by the physician using a Likert scale of 1 to 7 (1=poor and 7=excellent). Responders refers to participants with physician assessment for maneuverability \& handling.

Ability to Deploy (Left Atrium): Score 1
GroupValue95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter0
Ability to Deploy (Left Atrium): Score 2
GroupValue95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter0
Ability to Deploy (Left Atrium): Score 3
GroupValue95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter0
Ability to Deploy (Left Atrium): Score 4
GroupValue95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter0
Ability to Deploy (Left Atrium): Score 5
GroupValue95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter0
Ability to Deploy (Left Atrium): Score 6
GroupValue95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter6
Ability to Deploy (Left Atrium): Score 7
GroupValue95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter17
Ability to Deploy (Right Atrium): Score 1
GroupValue95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter0
Number of Responders for Physician Assessment for Signal Collection and Quality Secondary · Up to 72 days

Number of responders for physician assessment for signal collection and quality were reported. A post-procedure survey of 11 questions, each with individual sub-questions were asked. Each question/sub-question was answered by the physician using a Likert scale of 1 to 7 (1=poor and 7=excellent). Responders refers to participants with physician assessment for signal collection and quality

UNIPOLAR signals in Atrium: Score 1
GroupValue95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter0
UNIPOLAR signals in Atrium: Score 2
GroupValue95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter0
UNIPOLAR signals in Atrium: Score 3
GroupValue95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter0
UNIPOLAR signals in Atrium: Score 4
GroupValue95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter0
UNIPOLAR signals in Atrium: Score 5
GroupValue95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter1
UNIPOLAR signals in Atrium: Score 6
GroupValue95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter4
UNIPOLAR signals in Atrium: Score 7
GroupValue95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter2
UNIPOLAR signals in Ventricle: Score 1
GroupValue95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter0
Number of Responders for Physician Assessment for Pacing Secondary · Up to 72 days

Number of responders for physician assessment for pacing (local pacing capture) were reported. A post-procedure survey of 11 questions, each with individual sub-questions were asked. Each question/sub-question was answered by the physician using a Likert scale of 1 to 7 (1=poor and 7=excellent). Responders refers to participants with physician assessment for pacing.

Local pacing capture: Score 1
GroupValue95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter0
Local pacing capture: Score 2
GroupValue95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter0
Local pacing capture: Score 3
GroupValue95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter1
Local pacing capture: Score 4
GroupValue95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter1
Local pacing capture: Score 5
GroupValue95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter2
Local pacing capture: Score 6
GroupValue95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter2
Local pacing capture: Score 7
GroupValue95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter3
Number of Responders for Physician Assessment for Catheter Design in OPTRELL Catheter for Mapping Secondary · Up to 72 days

Number of responders for physician assessment for catheter design were reported. A post-procedure survey of 11 questions, each with individual sub-questions were asked. Each question/sub-question was answered by the physician using a Likert scale of 1 to 7 (1=poor and 7=excellent). Responders refers to participants with physician assessment for catheter design in OPTRELL catheter for mapping.

Ability to achieve electrode contact with cardiac tissue: Score 1
GroupValue95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter0
Ability to achieve electrode contact with cardiac tissue: Score 2
GroupValue95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter1
Ability to achieve electrode contact with cardiac tissue: Score 3
GroupValue95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter0
Ability to achieve electrode contact with cardiac tissue: Score 4
GroupValue95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter2
Ability to achieve electrode contact with cardiac tissue: Score 5
GroupValue95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter2
Ability to achieve electrode contact with cardiac tissue: Score 6
GroupValue95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter18
Ability to achieve electrode contact with cardiac tissue: Score 7
GroupValue95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter8
Electrodes spacing: Score 1
GroupValue95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter0
Number of Responders for Physician Assessment for Workflow Secondary · Up to 72 days

Number of responders for physician assessment for workflow were reported. A post-procedure survey of 11 questions, each with individual sub-questions were asked. Each question/sub-question was answered by the physician using a Likert scale of 1 to 7 (1=poor and 7=excellent). Responders refers to participants with physician assessment for workflow.

Ability to reduce fluoroscopy: Score 1
GroupValue95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter0
Ability to reduce fluoroscopy: Score 2
GroupValue95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter0
Ability to reduce fluoroscopy: Score 3
GroupValue95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter0
Ability to reduce fluoroscopy: Score 4
GroupValue95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter10
Ability to reduce fluoroscopy: Score 5
GroupValue95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter6
Ability to reduce fluoroscopy: Score 6
GroupValue95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter10
Ability to reduce fluoroscopy: Score 7
GroupValue95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter5
Time for pre-procedure mapping: Score 1
GroupValue95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter0
Number of Responders for Physician Assessment for Catheter Visualization Secondary · Up to 72 days

Number of responders for physician assessment for catheter visualization were reported. A post-procedure survey of 11 questions, each with individual sub-questions were asked. Each question/sub-question was answered by the physician using a Likert scale of 1 to 7 (1=poor and 7=excellent). Responders refers to participants with physician assessment for catheter visualization.

Visualization under fluoroscopy: Score 1
GroupValue95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter0
Visualization under fluoroscopy: Score 2
GroupValue95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter0
Visualization under fluoroscopy: Score 3
GroupValue95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter0
Visualization under fluoroscopy: Score 4
GroupValue95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter0
Visualization under fluoroscopy: Score 5
GroupValue95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter7
Visualization under fluoroscopy: Score 6
GroupValue95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter9
Visualization under fluoroscopy: Score 7
GroupValue95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter15
Visualization in CARTO 3: Score 1
GroupValue95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter0
Number of Responders for Physician Assessment for Catheters Interactions Secondary · Up to 72 days

Number of responders for physician assessment for catheters interactions were reported. A post-procedure survey of 11 questions, each with individual sub-questions were asked. Each question/sub-question was answered by the physician using a Likert scale of 1 to 7 (1=poor and 7=excellent). Responders refers to participants with physician assessment for catheters interactions.

With CARTO 3 System: Score 1
GroupValue95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter0
With CARTO 3 System: Score 2
GroupValue95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter0
With CARTO 3 System: Score 3
GroupValue95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter0
With CARTO 3 System: Score 4
GroupValue95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter0
With CARTO 3 System: Score 5
GroupValue95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter4
With CARTO 3 System: Score 6
GroupValue95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter12
With CARTO 3 System: Score 7
GroupValue95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter15
EP Lab recording equipment: Score 1
GroupValue95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter0
Number of Responders for Physician Assessment for Arrhythmogenicity Secondary · Up to 72 days

Number of responders with physician assessment for arrhythmogenicity were reported. A post-procedure survey of 11 questions, each with individual sub-questions were asked. Each question/sub-question was answered by the physician using a Likert scale of 1 to 7 (1=poor and 7=excellent). Responders refers to participants with physician assessment for arrhythmogenicity.

Compared to the PENTARAY catheter?: Score 1
GroupValue95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter0
Compared to the PENTARAY catheter?: Score 2
GroupValue95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter0
Compared to the PENTARAY catheter?: Score 3
GroupValue95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter0
Compared to the PENTARAY catheter?: Score 4
GroupValue95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter2
Compared to the PENTARAY catheter?: Score 5
GroupValue95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter5
Compared to the PENTARAY catheter?: Score 6
GroupValue95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter10
Compared to the PENTARAY catheter?: Score 7
GroupValue95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter14
Compared to other competitive multielectrode catheters?: Score 1
GroupValue95% CI
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter0

Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Time frame: Up to 72 days. Reporting threshold: 0%. Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.

OPTRELL Mapping Catheter
Serious: 3/31 (10%)
Deaths: 0/31

Serious adverse events (4 terms)

ReactionSystemOPTRELL Mapping Catheter
AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders
Catheter site injuryGeneral disorders
Vascular pseudoaneurysmInjury, poisoning and procedural complications
Peripheral artery haematomaVascular disorders
Other adverse events (8 terms — click to expand)

ReactionSystemOPTRELL Mapping Catheter
FatigueGeneral disorders
Left ventricular dilatationCardiac disorders
Left ventricular dysfunctionCardiac disorders
Abdominal pain, upperGastrointestinal disorders
Ear infectionInfections and infestations
Lower limb fractureInjury, poisoning and procedural complications
ParaesthesiaNervous system disorders
Anxiety disorderPsychiatric disorders

Most-reported serious reactions: Anaemia, Catheter site injury, Vascular pseudoaneurysm, Peripheral artery haematoma.

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04983797 adverse events section.

Sponsor's own description

The purpose of this study is to assess the performance and safety for the use of the OPTRELL Catheter for intracardiac mapping in the atria and ventricles.

Publications & conference data

1 peer-reviewed publication reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):

  1. Safety and feasibility of a novel multielectrode array catheter in mapping atrial and ventricular arrhythmias with high density: results from the multicenter OPTIMUM study.
    Vijgen J, Račkauskas G, Dilling-Boer D, Sarkozy A, et al · · 2023 · cited 1× · PMID 37227536 · DOI 10.1007/s10840-023-01568-y

Verify or expand the search:

Other recruiting trials for Scar-related Atrial Tachycardia

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other Biosense Webster, Inc. trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT04983797.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing