Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT04963374

the Effectiveness of Different Risk Scales In Predicting VTE in Respiratory Inpatients

Completed Last updated 22 November 2023
What this trial tests

trial testing risk evolution scale in Venous Thromboembolism in 100 participants. Completed in 31 December 2022.

Timeline
1 April 2021
Primary endpoint
31 December 2022
31 December 2022

Quick facts

Lead sponsorPeking University Third Hospital
StatusCompleted
Study typeOBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment100
Start date1 April 2021
Primary completion31 December 2022
Estimated completion31 December 2022
Sites1 location across China

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Peking University Third Hospital

Who can join

Adults 18 to 100, any sex, with Venous Thromboembolism. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Sponsor's own description

To compare the predictive effectiveness of the Caprini risk assessment model, the Padua risk assessment model and the VTE risk assessment in medical patients mentioned in the 2018 edition of the Guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment and prevention of pulmonary thromboembolism on the risk of concomitant VTE in respiratory inpatients to provide a basis for clinical VTE assessment and treatment.

Publications & conference data

No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial. Completed trials usually publish results within 12-18 months.

Verify or expand the search:

Other recruiting trials for Venous Thromboembolism

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other Peking University Third Hospital trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT04963374.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing