Adults 21 to 65, female only, with Alcohol Drinking or Craving. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
Alcohol CravingPrimary· Participants reported cravings one-month after the intervention.
Participants completed the 4-item imagery subscale of the Craving Experiences Questionnaire, which measures craving/intense desire. Items are rated on a 0 to 10 point scale. A mean was calculated from the 4-item imagery subscale, with a possible range of 0 to 10. Higher scores indicate greater alcohol craving.
Group
Value
95% CI
Cognitive Interference Task
2.51
± 2.65
Assessment Only
2.79
± 2.57
Average Drinks Per OccasionPrimary· Participants reported alcohol consumption one month after the intervention.
Participants completed the Timeline Follow Back, which assesses past-month alcohol consumption. The outcome measure is average drinks per drinking occasion. Scores ranged from 0 to 6.29 drinks. Higher scores indicate greater average drinks consumed per occasion.
Group
Value
95% CI
Cognitive Interference Task
3.31
± 1.62
Assessment Only
2.75
± 1.38
Number of Standard DrinksPrimary· Participants reported number of standard drinks each morning at a scheduled time for 14 days.
Participants reported the number of standard drinks consumed yesterday. The scale ranged from 0 to more than 20. Higher scores indicate more drinks consumed. A single value for number of standard drinks reported each day for 14 days was averaged across all participants.
Group
Value
95% CI
Cognitive Interference Task
2.00
± 2.87
Assessment Only
1.58
± 2.06
Changes in Alcohol Craving Before and After Tetris TaskPrimary· Participants reported pre- and post-task alcohol craving up to three times per day for a 14-day intervention period. Post-task craving was measured right after the Tetris task/control break and pre-task craving was measured directly before.
During the intervention phase, participants received up to three daily random in-vivo assessments assessing craving. Participants in the experimental group completed a Tetris task if they reported a positive response to craving and participants in the control group took an equivalently long break. Participants then re-rated their craving. Both craving assessments used a single item from the Visual Analogue Craving Scale ("How strong is your craving for alcohol RIGHT NOW?"), ranging from 0 to 100. The outcome measure represents change in craving, calculated as post-task craving minus pre-task c
Group
Value
95% CI
Cognitive Interference Task
-10.16
± 20.56
Assessment Only
-2.63
± 13.95
Changes in Alcohol Craving Before and After Cue Tetris TaskPrimary· Participants reported pre- and post-task alcohol craving up to once a day for a 14-day intervention period. Post-task craving was measured right after the CREMA/wait period and pre-task craving was measured directly before.
During the intervention phase, participants received a daily Cue Reactivity Ecological Momentary Assessment (CREMA), which provides real-time responses to alcohol-related imagery. After the CREMA, participants in the experimental group completed a Tetris task and participants in the control group took an equivalently long break. Participants then re-rated their craving. Both craving assessments used a single item from the Visual Analogue Craving Scale ("How strong is your craving for alcohol RIGHT NOW?"), ranging from 0 to 100. The outcome measure represents change in craving, calculated as po
Group
Value
95% CI
Cognitive Interference Task
0.30
± 17.93
Assessment Only
1.69
± 12.47
Obsessive Thoughts About AlcoholSecondary· Participants reported obsessive thoughts about alcohol at a single baseline assessment, which occurred the day before the EMA period began.
Participants rated their craving and drinking behavior on the 6-item Obsessive subscale of the Obsessive Compulsive Drinking Scale, which measures obsessive thoughts about alcohol. Each item is provided on a scale from 0 to 4. A total score was calculated, with a range of 0 to 24. Higher scores represent more obsessive thoughts of drinking.
Group
Value
95% CI
Cognitive Interference Task
4.10
± 3.77
Assessment Only
2.55
± 2.44
Drinking MotivesSecondary· Participants reported drinking motives at baseline.
Participants rated their motivations for drinking alcohol on the Drinking Motives Questionnaire. The Drinking Motives Questionnaire consists of 28 items, each rated on a 1 to 5 scale. A mean score was calculated using all 28 items, with a total score range of 1 to 5. Higher scores indicate higher endorsement of motives to drink alcohol.
Group
Value
95% CI
Cognitive Interference Task
2.251786
± .6690041
Assessment Only
2.198214
± .6381906
Feasibility of InterventionSecondary· This was recorded during the 14-day intervention phase.
The percentage of prompts participants responded to, calculated by the number of surveys participants responded to divided by the number of all possible surveys multiplied by 100%. Higher numbers indicate a greater number of responses.
Group
Value
95% CI
Cognitive Interference Task
89.4
Assessment Only
86.3
Acceptability RatingsSecondary· Recorded within one-week after the intervention.
Participants rated acceptability of the intervention on the Acceptability of Intervention Measure. Each item was rated on a 1 to 5 point scale. Total scores of 4 items were calculated with higher scores indicating greater acceptability (range 4-20).
Group
Value
95% CI
Cognitive Interference Task
14.3
± 4.243881
Depression SymptomsSecondary· Participants reported depression symptoms at baseline.
Participants responded to the Patient Health Questionnaire assessing symptoms of depression. The item assessing suicidal ideation was omitted. The 8 items included were rated on a 4 point scale ranging from 0 to 3 and totaled. Scores ranged from 0 to 24 and higher scores indicate greater symptoms of depression.
Participants rated symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder on the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (PCL-5). Each symptom is rated on a 0 to 4 point scale. The 20 items are totaled and scores can range from 0 to 80. Higher scores indicate greater posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms.
Group
Value
95% CI
Cognitive Interference Task
17.9
± 14.06
Assessment Only
15.85
± 14.92
Alcohol Use Disorder Symptoms at BaselineSecondary· Participants reported self-reported symptoms of alcohol use disorder at baseline.
Participants rated symptoms of alcohol use disorder on the the Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test (AUDIT). The AUDIT includes ten items assessing symptoms of alcohol use disorder. Each item is rated from 0 to 4 and items are added. Total scores on the Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test (AUDIT) are reported. A score of 8 or higher is the suggested cut-off for harmful drinking.
Group
Value
95% CI
Cognitive Interference Task
12.3
± 6.681475
Assessment Only
10.4
± 7.214021
Sponsor's own description
The purpose of this study is to test a brief task of playing the game Tetris to reduce alcohol cravings and alcohol use. Women who are seen at primary care and recruited through the community will be asked to rate alcohol craving and use for a 1-week baseline period. Then they will be randomly assigned to play the Tetris game on their phones daily or to a control condition for a 2-week period. Participants will also complete a cue-reactivity task, that involves viewing pictures of alcohol and rating cravings.
Publications & conference data
No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial. Completed trials usually publish results within 12-18 months.
NCT07415707 — The GLUCID Study: Effect of Alcohol Reduction and Probiotic Interventions on Cognition and Brain Glucose Metabolism in N
· NA
· recruiting
NCT06815237 — Effects of Ketone Supplement and Alcohol on Brain Metabolism
· Phase 2, PHASE3
· recruiting
NCT05363878 — Development of a Culturally Grounded, Trauma-Informed Alcohol Intervention With a Reserve-Dwelling First Nation Group
· NA
· recruiting
NCT06309134 — The Healthy Families Bright Futures Program
· NA
· recruiting
Other Medical University of South Carolina trials
Trials by the same sponsor.
NCT06491264 — Multiparameter Optimized tES for Memory in Aging
· NA
· withdrawn
NCT07513389 — Omission of Postoperative Radiation in HPV-Associated Oropharyngeal Cancer Using ctHPVDNA Surveillance (OPERATION)
· Phase 2
· not yet recruiting
NCT03101917 — Microtable® Method for Cochlear Implantation Investigational Device Exemption (IDE)
· NA
· not yet recruiting
NCT07149207 — Intraoperative Molecular Imaging Using ICG for Head and Neck Tumors
· Phase 2
· recruiting
NCT06148038 — CBD for Breast Cancer Primary Tumors
· Phase 1
· recruiting
Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by Medical University of South Carolina
Last refreshed: 25 April 2024
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT04924283.