Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT04871620: COMPARE

Reliability of a New Pulse Contour Technique for Diagnosing an Increase in Stroke Volume During a Fluid Challenge for Hemodynamic Optimization in Patients Scheduled for High-risk Abdominal Surgery: Comparison With Transthoracic Echocardiography: COMPARE Study

Status unknown Last updated 4 May 2021
What this trial tests

trial testing >15% SV increase during fluid challenge in Surgery in 50 participants. Status unknown.

Timeline
1 January 2016
Primary endpoint
31 October 2021
31 October 2021

Quick facts

Lead sponsorCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes
StatusStatus unknown
Study typeOBSERVATIONAL
Enrollment50
Start date1 January 2016
Primary completion31 October 2021
Estimated completion31 October 2021
Sites1 location across France

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes

Who can join

18 and older, any sex, with Surgery or Cardiac Output, Low. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Sponsor's own description

The present study aims at assessing the ability of a new pulse contour device for diagnosing a \>15% stroke volume (SV) increase during patient hemodynamic optimization by fluid challenge in high risk abdominal surgery.

Publications & conference data

No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial.

Verify or expand the search:

Other recruiting trials for Surgery

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT04871620.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing