18 and older, any sex, with Vascular Access. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
Number of Participants With Success in the First AttemptPrimary· From the time of randomization until the time of the first successful attempt, up to 30 minutes.
The success numbers of the first attempt during the implementation of all three methods
Group
Value
95% CI
Standard Technique Group
56
Ultrasound Group
71
Near Infrared Device Group
53
Procedure Time.Secondary· From the time of the tourniquet application, until the procedure successfully achieved, up to 1 hour.
Time of the intravenous catheter placement procedure
Group
Value
95% CI
Standard Technique Group
72
47 – 134
Ultrasound Group
107
69 – 228
Near Infrared Device Group
82
61 – 163
Patients Who Need Rescue MethodsSecondary· Up to 1 hour.
The method used as a rescue method when the primary method fails to achieve success.
Group
Value
95% CI
Standard Technique Group
17
Ultrasound Group
17
Near Infrared Device Group
25
Number of AttemptsSecondary· From the time of randomization until the time of the successful attempt, up to 1 hour.
Number of attempts to successfully insert peripheral vascular cateter.
Group
Value
95% CI
Standard Technique Group
1
1 – 2
Ultrasound Group
1
1 – 1
Near Infrared Device Group
1
1 – 2
Sponsor's own description
The aim of this study is to investigate whether there is any difference between the use of standard techniques, ultrasonography and infra-red light for the success of the first attempt in difficult peripheral vascular access patients. Patients who have difficult vascular access history ( often need 2 or more attempt to access peripheral intravenous catheter), who do not have palpable or visible vein after tourniquet, and who have the hard anticipation according to operator ( easy-moderate-hard) are included to study. The primary objective is planned as the determination of the success rate in the first attempt. Secondary aims of the study were determined as: total procedure time,total number of attempts, and need for rescue procedure
Publications & conference data
No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial. Completed trials usually publish results within 12-18 months.
NCT06639451 — A Prospective, Multi-center Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of BSJ020R in Treatment of AVF for Hemodialysis (RANGE
· NA
· active not recruiting
NCT06451185 — Statseal® for Central Venous Catheter Insertion Sites in Critical Care
· NA
· active not recruiting
Other Ege University trials
Trials by the same sponsor.
NCT07468227 — Effect of Helfer Skin Tap and Vibration on Pain and Fear in Children During Intramuscular Injection
· NA
· not yet recruiting
NCT07473050 — Virtual Reality-Based 'Health at My Feet' Program for Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes
· NA
· not yet recruiting
NCT06955338 — Music and VR Effects on Pain, Anxiety, and Fear During Oral Mucositis Care in Leukaemic Children
· NA
· not yet recruiting
NCT07344532 — Effect of Preoperative Abdominal Effleurage on Postoperative Constipation
· NA
· not yet recruiting
NCT07417748 — Kinesthetic Exercises on Adults
· NA
· active not recruiting
Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by Ege University
Last refreshed: 3 December 2021
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT04821362.