Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT04821362

Comparison of Different Techniques on First Attempt Success in Difficult Vascular Access Patients

Completed NA Results posted Last updated 3 December 2021
What this trial tests

NA trial testing Ultrasound group in Vascular Access in 270 participants. Completed in 1 March 2020.

Timeline
15 April 2019
Primary endpoint
1 February 2020
1 March 2020

Quick facts

Lead sponsorEge University
PhaseNA
StatusCompleted
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designsingle group
Maskingnone
Primary purposeother
Enrollment270
Start date15 April 2019
Primary completion1 February 2020
Estimated completion1 March 2020
Sites1 location across Turkey (Türkiye)

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Ege University

Who can join

18 and older, any sex, with Vascular Access. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.

Number of Participants With Success in the First Attempt Primary · From the time of randomization until the time of the first successful attempt, up to 30 minutes.

The success numbers of the first attempt during the implementation of all three methods

GroupValue95% CI
Standard Technique Group56
Ultrasound Group71
Near Infrared Device Group53
Procedure Time. Secondary · From the time of the tourniquet application, until the procedure successfully achieved, up to 1 hour.

Time of the intravenous catheter placement procedure

GroupValue95% CI
Standard Technique Group7247 – 134
Ultrasound Group10769 – 228
Near Infrared Device Group8261 – 163
Patients Who Need Rescue Methods Secondary · Up to 1 hour.

The method used as a rescue method when the primary method fails to achieve success.

GroupValue95% CI
Standard Technique Group17
Ultrasound Group17
Near Infrared Device Group25
Number of Attempts Secondary · From the time of randomization until the time of the successful attempt, up to 1 hour.

Number of attempts to successfully insert peripheral vascular cateter.

GroupValue95% CI
Standard Technique Group11 – 2
Ultrasound Group11 – 1
Near Infrared Device Group11 – 2

Sponsor's own description

The aim of this study is to investigate whether there is any difference between the use of standard techniques, ultrasonography and infra-red light for the success of the first attempt in difficult peripheral vascular access patients. Patients who have difficult vascular access history ( often need 2 or more attempt to access peripheral intravenous catheter), who do not have palpable or visible vein after tourniquet, and who have the hard anticipation according to operator ( easy-moderate-hard) are included to study. The primary objective is planned as the determination of the success rate in the first attempt. Secondary aims of the study were determined as: total procedure time,total number of attempts, and need for rescue procedure

Publications & conference data

No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial. Completed trials usually publish results within 12-18 months.

Verify or expand the search:

Other trials of Ultrasound group

Trials testing the same drug.

Other recruiting trials for Vascular Access

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other Ege University trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT04821362.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing