Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT04801082

Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Coeliac Plexus Neurolysis for Cancer Pain: Chemical Versus Radiofrequency Ablation

Status unknown Phase 4 Last updated 17 March 2021
What this trial tests

Phase 4 trial testing Alcohol injection in Malignancy in 54 participants. Status unknown.

Timeline
1 March 2021
Primary endpoint
31 January 2024
31 March 2025

Quick facts

Lead sponsorThe University of Hong Kong
PhasePhase 4
StatusStatus unknown
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designparallel
Maskingdouble
Primary purposetreatment
Enrollment54
Start date1 March 2021
Primary completion31 January 2024
Estimated completion31 March 2025
Sites1 location across Hong Kong

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

The University of Hong Kong

Who can join

18 and older, any sex, with Malignancy or Pain Management. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

What's being measured

Primary outcomes are the specific endpoints the trial is designed to prove or disprove.

Sponsor's own description

Many cancer patients suffer from intractable pain and which is often suboptimally controlled by even strong opioid analgesics. Coeliac plexus neurolysis (CPN) is procedure which intended to permanently destroy the nociceptive pathway that transmits the pain caused by the tumour. It can be with different approaches, such as percutaneously guided by fluoroscopy, echo-endoscopically or surgically with endoscopic approach being the more popular one in many centers equipped with echo-endoscopic services. The effect of CPN has been well established by some retrospective series. The overall response rate to CPN ranges from 70-90%, however, the analgesic effect is limited and up to roughly around 3 months. It is believed that the short-lasting analgesic effect is related to incomplete neurolysis by absolute alcohol injection. Recently, radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of coeliac plexus has been introduced as another mode of CPN. So far, only one small single center randomized controlled trial (RCT) suggesting superior performance in favour to CPN using RFA. This result has to be validated and by a RCT with larger sample size. In addition, data concerning the quality of life (QOL) improvement and cost-effectiveness need to be further elucidated. Therefore, the aim of this study is to perform a RCT to look into these issues.

Publications & conference data

1 peer-reviewed publication reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):

  1. Sympathetic nerve blocks for persistent pain in adults with inoperable abdominopelvic cancer.
    Nagar SD, Nagar SJ, Jordan V, Dawson J. · · 2024 · cited 2× · PMID 38842054 · DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd015229.pub2

Verify or expand the search:

Other recruiting trials for Malignancy

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other The University of Hong Kong trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT04801082.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing