Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT04747587: OPTISTROKE

Non-use After Stroke: Influence of Applied Force and Precision When Reaching With the Paretic Upper Limb

Completed NA Last updated 18 December 2025
What this trial tests

NA trial testing Reaching Session in Stroke in 53 participants. Completed in 25 April 2023.

Timeline
11 May 2021
Primary endpoint
25 April 2023
25 April 2023

Quick facts

Lead sponsorCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes
PhaseNA
StatusCompleted
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationnon randomized
Designparallel
Maskingnone
Primary purposeother
Enrollment53
Start date11 May 2021
Primary completion25 April 2023
Estimated completion25 April 2023
Sites2 locations across France

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes

Who can join

18 and older, any sex, with Stroke. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Sponsor's own description

After a stroke, 80% of patients have an upper limb deficit, limiting activity. Some develop a non-use: they can, but do not, use their paretic limb. Non-use is a general phenomenon applied to all situations where the patient applies unnecessary compensation. Several rehabilitation techniques are effective to counter non-use, but there is insufficient knowledge to choose the most suitable technique. Optimal control theory could help guide these choices. It assumes that the chosen coordination satisfies the constraints of the task (force, amplitude, tolerance) while reducing the cost of the movement. This study will assess non-use by anticipating the sensitivity to the constraints of force and precision deduced from the logic of optimal control. The study authors expect to observe a weakness effect: in a reaching task (i.e. when the person has to touch an object placed in front of them), lightening the paretic arm makes it possible to reduce non-use, and a precision effect: in a reaching task, non-use increases with the required spatial precision.

Publications & conference data

5 peer-reviewed publications reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):

  1. Validity and Reliability of Kinect v2 for Quantifying Upper Body Kinematics during Seated Reaching.
    Faity G, Mottet D, Froger J. · · 2022 · cited 23× · PMID 35408349 · DOI 10.3390/s22072735
  2. Force reserve predicts compensation in reaching movement with induced shoulder strength deficit.
    Faity G, Barradas VR, Schweighofer N, Mottet D. · · 2024 · cited 2× · PMID 38985941 · DOI 10.1152/jn.00143.2024
  3. Neuromechanics of Nonuse and Compensation: Implications for Rehabilitation After Stroke.
    Faity G, Mottet D, Froger J, Delorme M. · · 2026 · PMID 42080459 · DOI 10.1177/15459683261445442
  4. Neuromechanics of nonuse and compensation: implications for rehabilitation after stroke
    Faity G, Mottet D, Froger J, Delorme M. · · 2025 · DOI 10.1101/2025.09.11.25335554
  5. Target height influences shoulder and elbow non-use after stroke during reaching with the hand : A brief communication
    Faity G, Mottet D, Froger J. · · 2022 · DOI 10.1101/2022.12.20.22283739

Verify or expand the search:

Other recruiting trials for Stroke

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT04747587.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing