Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT04746820: fNIRS

Functional Near-infrared Spectroscopy in Unconscious Patients

Recruiting now NA Last updated 16 May 2025
What this trial tests

NA trial testing single-center prospective pilot study in Nervous System Diseases in 30 participants. Currently enrolling.

Timeline
15 January 2020
Primary endpoint
31 December 2026
31 December 2026

Quick facts

Lead sponsorEmanuela Keller
PhaseNA
StatusRecruiting now
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationnon randomized
Designsingle group
Maskingnone
Primary purposediagnostic
Enrollment30
Start date15 January 2020
Primary completion31 December 2026
Estimated completion31 December 2026
Sites2 locations across Switzerland

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Emanuela Keller

Who can join

18 and older, any sex, with Nervous System Diseases or Healthy Subjects. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Sponsor's own description

The study design is a single-center prospective pilot study. Hypothesis: Results of cerebral fNIRS examination in unconscious patients with severe hemorrhagic or ischemic stroke in the ICU are congruent with the results of SSEP and AEP. Hence, making it a potential prognostic tool for unconscious ICU patients. In a specific subgroup of unconscious patients after cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation the fNIRS measurement is congruent with the results of electroencephalography (EEG). The primary purpose of this study is to evaluate the agreement of the results of fNIRS examination to those of evoked potentials and EEG in unconscious ICU patients with severe hemorrhagic, or ischemic strokes or hypoxic brain injury after cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation. fNIRS will be compared to evoked potentials in an experimental group consisting of unconscious neuro-intensive care patients and in a control group consisting of healthy, conscious subjects. To compare fNIRS with evoked potentials there are two test phases: 1. The cerebral response to a somatosensory stimulus (peripheral nerve stimulation) is measured by fNIRS and SSEP 2. The cerebral response to an auditory stimulus is measured by fNIRS and AEP To avoid biases the following has to be considered: * The timing of the measurements plays an important role. A time difference between compared measurements can influence the outcome significantly due to deterioration or recovery of the neuronal network during the time gap. Therefore, fNIRS and evoked potentials will be measured simultaneously. * If the compared measurement methods are conducted by the same researcher the possibility of bias is high. Hence, two different researcher will conduct each one measurement without knowing the results of each other during the measurement.

Publications & conference data

No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial.

Verify or expand the search:

Other recruiting trials for Nervous System Diseases

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other Emanuela Keller trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT04746820.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing