Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT04614480: EXOMA2

Exome Analysis (Complexe vs Simple) to Help the Therapeutic Decision for the Precision Medicine

Recruiting now Phase 2 Last updated 22 September 2025
What this trial tests

Phase 2 trial testing Exome analysis in Cancer in 7,976 participants. Currently enrolling.

Timeline
25 August 2020
Primary endpoint
2 September 2028
2 September 2032

Quick facts

Lead sponsorCentre Georges Francois Leclerc
PhasePhase 2
StatusRecruiting now
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationnon randomized
Designparallel
Maskingnone
Primary purposediagnostic
Enrollment7,976
Start date25 August 2020
Primary completion2 September 2028
Estimated completion2 September 2032
Sites12 locations across France

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Centre Georges Francois Leclerc — full company profile →

Who can join

18 and older, any sex, with Cancer. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Sponsor's own description

The "simple" analysis of the exome can determine somatic and constitutional mutations. The major challenge lies in the translation of sequencing data into clinically relevant information allowing the clinician to guide his decision-making A "complex" analysis of the exome would provide access to structural DNA data, concerning mutational signatures, tumor mutational load, analysis of large deletions, loss of heterozygosity as well as amplification of certain genes which may have an impact on the management of patients. No data available to date makes it possible to assess the clinical interest of the availability of its additional information resulting from a "complex" analysis compared to a "simple" analysis. The objective of the EXOMA2 study is to assess the proportion of patients for whom the proposed therapy is derived from its additional information (complex analysis) and would not have been possible with a classic exome analysis (simple analysis) . We hereby formulate the hypothesis that a "complex" analysis on a population presenting a metastatic or locally advanced disease treated early (from the 1st line of treatment) will make it possible to determine therapeutic indications which could not be discovered with a "simple" analysis.

Publications & conference data

4 peer-reviewed publications reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):

  1. FGF/FGFR genomic amplification as a predictive biomarker for immune checkpoint blockade resistance: a short report.
    Roussot N, Lecuelle J, Dalens L, Truntzer C, et al · · 2023 · cited 5× · PMID 37890888 · DOI 10.1136/jitc-2023-007763
  2. Exome-Based Genomic Markers Could Improve Prediction of Checkpoint Inhibitor Efficacy Independently of Tumor Type.
    Dalens L, Lecuelle J, Favier L, Fraisse C, et al · · 2023 · cited 3× · PMID 37108755 · DOI 10.3390/ijms24087592
  3. Targeting mTOR signaling for the treatment of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with TSC1/ARID1A mutations: a case report with an unexpected response.
    Daugan C, Boidot R, Ghiringhelli F, Borg C, et al · · 2024 · cited 2× · PMID 39281970 · DOI 10.1177/17588359241271793
  4. Clinical Interest in Exome-Based Analysis of Somatic Mutational Signatures for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.
    Peroz M, Mananet H, Roussot N, Kaderbhai CG, et al · · 2024 · PMID 39272973 · DOI 10.3390/cancers16173115

Verify or expand the search:

Other recruiting trials for Cancer

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other Centre Georges Francois Leclerc trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT04614480.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing