Adults 18 to 90, any sex, with Oral Mucosal Disorder. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
Number of Participants With Oral Mucosal Exfoliation (Oral Sloughing)Primary· End of treatment (3 weeks)
Percentage of participants who experienced oral sloughing as reported either by the subject or determined by the dental evaluator.
Group
Value
95% CI
Comparator: No SLS Toothpaste
15
Comparator: Medium SLS Toothpaste
14
Comparator: High SLS Toothpaste
13
The Number of Participants With a Given Range of Average Oral Mucosal Sloughing Index ScoresSecondary· Mid-Treatment (10 days)
Average score based on the mean of sloughing scores over 12 intra-oral areas. The sloughing score uses a 6 point scale as follows: 0= no sloughing, 1=flecks of desquamation, 2=sheets of desquamation, 3=redness, not due to plaque, 4=erosion of mucosa, 5=ulcerated areas.
The twelve intra-oral areas of the mouth are as follows: dorsal and ventral surfaces of the tongue, floor and roof of the mouth, right and left buccal mucosa, gingival tissue.
(upper right, upper anterior, upper left, lower left, lower anterior, lower right)
Group
Value
95% CI
Comparator: No SLS Toothpaste
8
Comparator: Medium SLS Toothpaste
6
Comparator: High SLS Toothpaste
7
Comparator: No SLS Toothpaste
9
Comparator: Medium SLS Toothpaste
8
Comparator: High SLS Toothpaste
6
Comparator: No SLS Toothpaste
1
Comparator: Medium SLS Toothpaste
3
Comparator: High SLS Toothpaste
2
Comparator: No SLS Toothpaste
0
Comparator: Medium SLS Toothpaste
0
Comparator: High SLS Toothpaste
1
The Number of Participants With a Given Range of Average Oral Mucosal Sloughing Index Scores.Secondary· End of Treatment (3 weeks)
Average score based on the mean of sloughing scores over 12 intra-oral areas. The sloughing score uses a 6 point scale as follows: 0= no sloughing, 1=flecks of desquamation, 2=sheets of desquamation, 3=redness, not due to plaque, 4=erosion of mucosa, 5=ulcerated areas.
The twelve intra-oral areas of the mouth are as follows: dorsal and ventral surfaces of the tongue, floor and roof of the mouth, right and left buccal mucosa, gingival tissue.
(upper right, upper anterior, upper left, lower left, lower anterior, lower right)
Group
Value
95% CI
Comparator: No SLS Toothpaste
6
Comparator: Medium SLS Toothpaste
9
Comparator: High SLS Toothpaste
7
Comparator: No SLS Toothpaste
9
Comparator: Medium SLS Toothpaste
6
Comparator: High SLS Toothpaste
6
Comparator: No SLS Toothpaste
3
Comparator: Medium SLS Toothpaste
2
Comparator: High SLS Toothpaste
2
Comparator: No SLS Toothpaste
0
Comparator: Medium SLS Toothpaste
1
Comparator: High SLS Toothpaste
1
The Number of Participants Reporting Their Acceptance Levels of Side EffectsSecondary· End of Treatment (3 weeks)
Subjects were questioned regarding how acceptable were your side effects. Using the following responses of: Completely unacceptable, somewhat unacceptable, somewhat acceptable, completely acceptable, did not experience side effects
Group
Value
95% CI
Comparator: No SLS Toothpaste
2
Comparator: Medium SLS Toothpaste
1
Comparator: High SLS Toothpaste
2
Comparator: No SLS Toothpaste
2
Comparator: Medium SLS Toothpaste
0
Comparator: High SLS Toothpaste
1
Comparator: No SLS Toothpaste
1
Comparator: Medium SLS Toothpaste
4
Comparator: High SLS Toothpaste
4
Comparator: No SLS Toothpaste
1
Comparator: Medium SLS Toothpaste
4
Comparator: High SLS Toothpaste
3
Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Time frame: Within 3 weeks of starting treatment.
Reporting threshold: 0%.
Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the incidence of oral tissue sloughing through self-report by study subjects and by professional dental examinations.
Publications & conference data
No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial.
NCT05748392 — 3M Veraflo™ Cleanse Choice Complete™ (VFCCC) Clinical Study
· NA
· withdrawn
NCT05768373 — A Comparison Study of Hypersensitivity Treatment
· NA
· completed
NCT05361746 — Scotchbond Universal Plus Compared to Scotchbond Universal With Filtek Universal Restorative to Restore Class V NCCLs
· NA
· active not recruiting
NCT05248204 — Scotchbond Universal Plus Compared to Scotchbond Universal for Posterior Class I & II Restorations With Filtek Universal
· NA
· completed
NCT04906512 — Comparing CHG I.V. Securement Dressing With Transparent Dressing for Evaluation of Antimicrobial Efficacy
· NA
· terminated
Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by Solventum US LLC
Last refreshed: 1 October 2024
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT04601103.