Adults 18 to 85, any sex, with Parkinson Disease. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
Motor Assessment 1: Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Section 3Primary· Pre-LIFUP and Post-LIFUP at Day 1 and Day 15
The participant will complete a 18-item comprehensive motor assessment that assesses elements of motor function including tremor, bradykinesia, and gait. The total score for this assessment ranges from 0 to 108 points, with higher scores indicating higher severity.
Pre-LIFUP
Group
Value
95% CI
Active LIFUP Session
37.24
± 9.91
Sham LIFUP Session
35.14
± 8.28
Post-LIFUP
Group
Value
95% CI
Active LIFUP Session
36.93
± 9.54
Sham LIFUP Session
34.21
± 9.43
Motor Assessment 2: Finger Tapping (Score)Primary· Pre-LIFUP and Post-LIFUP at Day 1 and Day 15
This task, which is item 3.4 on the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS), asks participants to tap their index finger on their thumb ten times as big and as fast as possible. Participants scores on item 3.4 with standard UPDRS scoring criteria (on a scale of 0 to 4, where a higher score indicates more severe Parkinson's symptoms i.e. worse performance) will be assessed pre and post-LIFUP. The scores reported below are for the hand on the side with worse symptoms (i.e. the side that LIFUP is intended to primarily affect).
Pre-LIFUP Score
Group
Value
95% CI
Active LIFUP Session
1.48
± 0.829
Sham LIFUP Session
1.45
± 0.936
Post-LIFUP Score
Group
Value
95% CI
Active LIFUP Session
1.66
± 0.974
Sham LIFUP Session
1.34
± 0.948
Motor Assessment 2: Finger Tapping (Speed)Primary· Pre-LIFUP and Post-LIFUP at Day 1 and Day 15
This task, which is item 3.4 on the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS), asks participants to tap their index finger on their thumb ten times as big and as fast as possible. The speed of taps will be assessed pre and post-LIFUP. Speed is calculated as \[number of taps per second\] times \[average tap amplitude\], where tap amplitude is measured on a scale of 0.0-1.0 representing the percentage of finger extension between taps, where e.g. extension to a 90 degree angle between thumb and index finger = 1.0, extension to 45 degree angle = 0.5, etc. Higher speed indicates better perfo
Pre-LIFUP Speed
Group
Value
95% CI
Active LIFUP Session
1.81
± 0.75
Sham LIFUP Session
1.72
± 0.74
Post-LIFUP Speed
Group
Value
95% CI
Active LIFUP Session
1.70
± 0.75
Sham LIFUP Session
1.94
± 0.80
Motor Assessment 2: 9-Hole Pegboard Dexterity TestPrimary· Pre-LIFUP and Post-LIFUP at Day 1 and Day 15
The participant will place and remove nine plastic pegs into a plastic pegboard. Scores are recorded as time in seconds that it takes the participant to complete the task with each hand. Analysis will compare pre- and post-treatment scores to quantify motor performance improvements.
Pre-LIFUP (Hand on side with more severe symptoms)
Group
Value
95% CI
Active LIFUP Session
23.87
± 9.44
Sham LIFUP Session
23.94
± 9.61
Post-LIFUP (Hand on side with more severe symptoms)
Group
Value
95% CI
Active LIFUP Session
23.49
± 7.54
Sham LIFUP Session
23.12
± 7.34
Pre-LIFUP (Hand on side with less severe symptoms)
Group
Value
95% CI
Active LIFUP Session
21.04
± 6.26
Sham LIFUP Session
20.73
± 7.50
Post-LIFUP (Hand on side with less severe symptoms)
Group
Value
95% CI
Active LIFUP Session
20.46
± 5.79
Sham LIFUP Session
20.12
± 4.40
Difference in BOLD fMRI Signal Between on vs. Off BlocksSecondary· During LIFUP (or sham) sonication on Day 1 and Day 15
BOLD data will be collected in real-time during the ultrasound sonication, which occurs in interleaved 30 second "on" and "off" blocks. Analyses will assess the statistical relationship between BOLD signal in the brain and the time series (on vs off) of the ultrasound sonication. Tabular data reported here represents the difference in BOLD activation between on and off conditions in the internal globus pallidus on the targeted side of the brain, calculated as the mean BOLD activation while LIFUP is on minus mean activation when it is off.
Group
Value
95% CI
Active LIFUP Session
1.19
± 6.53
Sham LIFUP Session
0.41
± 3.49
Perfusion Changes in Internal Globus Pallidus, External Globus Pallidus, and PutamenSecondary· Pre-LIFUP and Post-LIFUP at Day 1 and Day 15
Arterial spin labeling data will be collected before and after sonication. Analyses will assess the statistical relationship between perfusion in the targeted internal globus pallidus, external globus pallidus, and putamen pre- and post-sonication in a within-subject repeated measures design.
GPi - Percent Change Perfusion
Group
Value
95% CI
Active LIFUP Session
16.4
± 50.6
Sham LIFUP Session
17.0
± 50.1
GPe - Percent Change Perfusion
Group
Value
95% CI
Active LIFUP Session
30.0
± 101.2
Sham LIFUP Session
16.6
± 46.1
Putamen - Percent Change Perfusion
Group
Value
95% CI
Active LIFUP Session
28.4
± 63.4
Sham LIFUP Session
14.0
± 45.7
Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Time frame: Adverse event data were collected 2, 4, and 7 days after each in-person session, and the two in-person sessions were two weeks apart. As a result, depending on whether participants received active then sham or sham then active, adverse event data were collected for either one week or three weeks after the active intervention..
Reporting threshold: 0%.
Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.
The study will test the feasibility of using Low Intensity Focused Ultrasound Pulsation (LIFUP) to treat motor symptoms in Parkinson's Disease (PD). LIFUP is a new technique that can increase brain activity in highly specific target areas and is MRI compatible. Thus, in real-time, it is possible to directly observe how LIFUP changes the brain areas important in PD by measuring its effects on brain activity, blood flow, and brain connectivity. If successful, this research will mark the first step towards a novel, non-invasive, non-medication treatment for PD.
Publications & conference data
2 peer-reviewed publications reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):
NCT07399496 — Accelerated TMS for Apathy in PD
· NA
· recruiting
NCT07371338 — Phase 1 Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety, Efficacy, and Pharmacokinetics of IPS101A in Parkinson's Disease Patients
· Phase 1
· recruiting
NCT07442370 — The Effect of Functional Rotational Exercises on Fall Risk and Mobility in Parkinson's Disease Patients
· NA
· recruiting
NCT06848205 — Percept Transitions in FOG and PD
· NA
· recruiting
NCT07432958 — A Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Two Doses of AP-472 as Adjunctive Therapy to Levodopa in Parkinson's Disease (P
· Phase 2
· recruiting
Other University of California, Los Angeles trials
Trials by the same sponsor.
NCT04846517 — rTMS for Aneroxia Nervosa in Youth
· NA
· not yet recruiting
NCT06701760 — Sodium Lactate in Severe TBI
· Phase 2
· not yet recruiting
NCT04996667 — Effect of iNO in Patients With Submassive and Massive PE
· Phase 2
· withdrawn
NCT05067387 — Evaluation of Oral THC and CBD in Men and Women
· Phase 1
· not yet recruiting
NCT07534696 — Evaluation of Non-Invasive Pelvic Floor Neuromuscular Stimulation for Urinary Incontinence After Prostatectomy
· NA
· not yet recruiting
Publications: Europe PMC API search by NCT ID, retrieved 10 June 2026
Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by University of California, Los Angeles
Last refreshed: 4 February 2026
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT04593875.