Last reviewed 2022-05-10 · How we verify
Home › Trials › NCT04585646
NCT04585646
A Two-Week Crossover Dispensing Evaluation Of Orion Daily Wear Soft Contact Lens
On this page:
Summary Quick facts Who can join Endpoints Results Publications Related trials Sources
Completed
NA
Results posted
Last updated 10 May 2022
What this trial tests
NA trial testing Orion daily disposable contact lens in Myopia in 64 participants. Completed in 31 December 2020.
Timeline
14 September 2020
Primary endpoint 30 November 2020
31 December 2020
Quick facts
Lead sponsor CooperVision, Inc.
Phase NA
Status Completed
Study type INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation randomized
Design crossover
Masking double
Primary purpose treatment
Enrollment 64
Start date 14 September 2020
Primary completion 30 November 2020
Estimated completion 31 December 2020
Sites 1 location across United States
Drugs / interventions tested
Orion daily disposable contact lens Gemini daily disposable contact lens
Conditions studied
Myopia — all drugs for Myopia →
Sponsor
CooperVision, Inc.
Who can join
Adults 18 to 55, any sex, with Myopia. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
Subjective Response for Vision Satisfaction
Primary
· Baseline - After 10 minutes of lens dispense
Subjective Response for Vision Satisfaction assessed on 7-point Likert (Very satisfied, Satisfied, Somewhat satisfied, Neither Satisfied nor Dissatisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Dissatisfied, Very Dissatisfied)
Very satisfied
Group Value 95% CI Orion 24 Gemini 28
Satisfied
Group Value 95% CI Orion 30 Gemini 24
Somewhat Satisfied
Group Value 95% CI Orion 4 Gemini 7
Neither
Group Value 95% CI Orion 1 Gemini 0
Somewhat Dissatisfied
Group Value 95% CI Orion 0 Gemini 0
Dissatisfied
Group Value 95% CI Orion 0 Gemini 0
Very Dissatisfied
Group Value 95% CI Orion 0 Gemini 0
Subjective Response for Overall Vision Satisfaction
Primary
· 2 Weeks
Subjective Response for Vision satisfaction assessed on 7-point Likert (Very satisfied, Satisfied, Somewhat satisfied, Neither Satisfied nor Dissatisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Dissatisfied, Very Dissatisfied)
Very satisfied
Group Value 95% CI Orion 26 Gemini 28
Satisfied
Group Value 95% CI Orion 22 Gemini 24
Somewhat Satisfied
Group Value 95% CI Orion 7 Gemini 5
Neither
Group Value 95% CI Orion 0 Gemini 1
Somewhat Dissatisfied
Group Value 95% CI Orion 3 Gemini 1
Dissatisfied
Group Value 95% CI Orion 1 Gemini 0
Very Dissatisfied
Group Value 95% CI Orion 0 Gemini 0
Subjective Response for Overall Vision Satisfaction
Primary
· 2 Weeks - at night
Subjective Response for Vision satisfaction assessed on 7-point Likert (Very satisfied, Satisfied, Somewhat satisfied, Neither Satisfied nor Dissatisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Dissatisfied, Very Dissatisfied)
Very satisfied
Group Value 95% CI Orion 42 Gemini 34
Satisfied
Group Value 95% CI Orion 41 Gemini 48
Somewhat Satisfied
Group Value 95% CI Orion 8 Gemini 10
Neither
Group Value 95% CI Orion 7 Gemini 3
Somewhat Dissatisfied
Group Value 95% CI Orion 2 Gemini 5
Dissatisfied
Group Value 95% CI Orion 0 Gemini 0
Very Dissatisfied
Group Value 95% CI Orion 0 Gemini 0
Subjective Response for Overall Vision Quality
Primary
· Baseline - After 10 minutes of lens dispense
Subjective Response for Overall Vision quality assessed on a 0-100 scale (0- Unacceptable, 100- Excellent Vision)
Group Value 95% CI Orion 90 ± 8 Gemini 91 ± 9
Subjective Response for Overall Vision Quality
Primary
· 2 weeks
Subjective Response for Overall Vision Quality assessed on a 0-100 scale (0- Unacceptable, 100- Excellent Vision)
Group Value 95% CI Orion 86 ± 16 Gemini 89 ± 10
Subjective Response for Overall Vision Quality
Primary
· 2 weeks - Night Driving
Subjective Response for Overall Vision Quality assessed on a 0-100 scale (0- Unacceptable, 100- Excellent Vision)
Group Value 95% CI Orion 87 ± 13 Gemini 88 ± 10
Subjective Overall Comfort Satisfaction
Secondary
· Baseline - After 10 minutes of lens dispense
Overall comfort satisfaction analyzed on 7-point Likert (Very satisfied, Satisfied, Somewhat satisfied, Neither Satisfied nor Dissatisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Dissatisfied, Very Dissatisfied)
Very satisfied
Group Value 95% CI Orion 32 Gemini 31
Satisfied
Group Value 95% CI Orion 20 Gemini 22
Somewhat satisfied
Group Value 95% CI Orion 7 Gemini 6
Neither
Group Value 95% CI Orion 0 Gemini 0
Somewhat Dissatisfied
Group Value 95% CI Orion 0 Gemini 0
Dissatisfied
Group Value 95% CI Orion 0 Gemini 0
Very Dissatisfied
Group Value 95% CI Orion 0 Gemini 0
Subjective Overall Comfort Satisfaction
Secondary
· 2 Weeks
Overall comfort satisfaction analyzed on 7-point Likert (Very satisfied, Satisfied, Somewhat satisfied, Neither Satisfied nor Dissatisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Dissatisfied, Very Dissatisfied)
Very satisfied
Group Value 95% CI Orion 22 Gemini 17
Satisfied
Group Value 95% CI Orion 25 Gemini 19
Somewhat satisfied
Group Value 95% CI Orion 6 Gemini 14
Neither
Group Value 95% CI Orion 0 Gemini 2
Somewhat Dissatisfied
Group Value 95% CI Orion 4 Gemini 4
Dissatisfied
Group Value 95% CI Orion 2 Gemini 3
Very Dissatisfied
Group Value 95% CI Orion 0 Gemini 0
Subjective Preference for Comfort
Secondary
· 2 weeks
Subjective preference for comfort (Orion strongly, Orion slightly, No preference, Gemini slightly, Gemini strongly)
Orion strongly
Group Value 95% CI Overall Study 13
Orion slightly
Group Value 95% CI Overall Study 21
No preference
Group Value 95% CI Overall Study 10
Gemini slightly
Group Value 95% CI Overall Study 7
Gemini strongly
Group Value 95% CI Overall Study 8
Lens Surface Wettability Performance
Secondary
· Baseline - After 10 minutes of lens dispense
Lens Surface wettability performance was measured on a scale of 0-4, 0.25 steps (0-Very poor, 1 - Poor, 2- Acceptable, 3- Good, 4- Excellent)
Group Value 95% CI Orion 3.40 ± 0.36 Gemini 3.32 ± 0.40
Lens Surface Wettability Performance
Secondary
· 2 weeks
Lens Surface wettability performance was measured on a scale of 0-4, 0.25 steps (0-Very poor, 1 - Poor, 2- Acceptable, 3- Good, 4- Excellent)
Group Value 95% CI Orion 3.31 ± 0.41 Gemini 3.40 ± 0.38
Horizontal Lens Centration
Secondary
· Baseline - After 10 minutes of lens dispense
Horizontal Lens Centration assessed in primary gaze, white light, diffuse, low-medium magnification, with graticule on 0.1mm steps (Nasal decentration given +ve value. temporal decentration given -ve value)
Group Value 95% CI Orion -0.12 ± 0.25 Gemini -0.18 ± 0.26
Sponsor's own description
The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the clinical performance of test lens (Orion) in comparison with control lens (Gemini) over a period of two weeks of wear.
Publications & conference data
1 peer-reviewed publication reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):
Silicone hydrogel versus hydrogel soft contact lenses for differences in patient-reported eye comfort and safety.
Haworth K, Travis D, Leslie L, Fuller D, et al ·
· 2023
· cited 10×
· PMID 37724689
· DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd014791.pub2
Verify or expand the search:
Other recruiting trials for Myopia
Currently open trials in the same condition.
NCT07284966 — Comfort and Vision With TOTAL30 Multifocal Lenses
· recruiting
NCT07078799 — Wavefront-guided LASIK Surgery Compared to Ray Tracing-Guided LASIK Surgery
· NA
· recruiting
NCT07585877 — Effect of Branched-Chain Amino Acid Supplementation on Myopia Progression
· NA
· active not recruiting
NCT07354945 — An Evaluation of Myopia Control Lenses on Wearing Experience in Myopic Children
· NA
· recruiting
NCT07229365 — Children's Viewing Behavior
· NA
· recruiting
Other CooperVision, Inc. trials
Trials by the same sponsor.
NCT06817785 — Soft Lens Study: Biomedics 1 Day Extra Sphere and Clariti 1 Day Sphere
· NA
· completed
NCT06758076 — A Clinical Comparison of Two Soft Contact Lenses (C24-755)
· NA
· completed
NCT06590441 — Investigation of Wearing Compliance of Spectacles for Myopia Control
· completed
NCT06609018 — Clinical Investigation of Buttermere (LENS 271) Soft Contact Lenses
· NA
· completed
NCT06611410 — 1 Week Crossover Study Between Two Soft Contact Lenses
· NA
· completed
Verify against primary sources
Data sources for this page
Trial protocol + status : ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04585646 (US National Library of Medicine, public domain)
Publications : Europe PMC API search by NCT ID, retrieved 10 June 2026
Drug + disease cross-links : matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
Sponsor : as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by CooperVision, Inc.
Last refreshed : 10 May 2022
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT04585646.
Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing
Not medical advice. Information on this page is collated from primary regulatory and clinical-trial sources for research purposes. It is not a substitute for consultation with a licensed healthcare professional. See our editorial policy for sourcing and methodology.