Adults 18 to 89, female only, with Breast Cancer or Gynecologic Cancer. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
Feasibility/ Enrollment in the StudyPrimary· Baseline (T1)
Percentage of participants enrolled of those eligible
Group
Value
95% CI
Mindful After Cancer
78.6
Feasibility/ Retention in the StudyPrimary· 1 month post-intervention (T2)
Number and percentage of participants completing all assessments
Group
Value
95% CI
Mindful After Cancer
22
Feasibility/ Retention in the InterventionPrimary· 1 month post-intervention (T2)
Number and percentage attending at least 6 of 8 sessions
Group
Value
95% CI
Mindful After Cancer
18
Acceptability of the InterventionPrimary· 1 month post-intervention (T2)
Endorsement of 10 items characterizing acceptability of the intervention (e.g., the program met my expectations). Range 10-100. Higher score indicates better acceptability.
Group
Value
95% CI
Mindful After Cancer
75.5
± 22.9
Change From Baseline Interest in Sexual Activity at 1 MonthSecondary· Baseline (T1) and 1 month post-intervention (T2)
PROMIS Sexual Function and Satisfaction 2.0. 2 items. Range 2-10. Higher score indicates more interest in sexual activity.
T1 Mean, SD
Group
Value
95% CI
Mindful After Cancer
4.4
± 1.4
T2 Mean, SD
Group
Value
95% CI
Mindful After Cancer
5.0
± 1.7
Change From Baseline Satisfaction With Sex Life at 1 MonthSecondary· Baseline (T1) and 1 month post-intervention (T2)
New Sexual Satisfaction Scale- Short Form (NSSS-S). 12 items. Range 12-60. Higher score indicates more sexual satisfaction.
T1 Mean, SD
Group
Value
95% CI
Mindful After Cancer
35
± 6.8
T2 Mean, SD
Group
Value
95% CI
Mindful After Cancer
37.3
± 7.4
Change From Baseline Self-efficacy at 1 MonthSecondary· Baseline (T1) and 1 month post-intervention (T2)
Self-efficacy for Managing Chronic Disease Scale (adapted). 6 items. Range 6-60. Higher score indicates better self-efficacy for managing sexual health after cancer.
Group
Value
95% CI
Mindful After Cancer
0.06
-0.87 – 0.98
Change From Baseline Body Image at 1 MonthSecondary· Baseline (T1) and 1 month post-intervention (T2)
Body Image Scale. 10 items. Range 0-30. Higher score indicates poorer body image.
T1 Mean, SD
Group
Value
95% CI
Mindful After Cancer
15.2
± 7.1
T2 Mean, SD
Group
Value
95% CI
Mindful After Cancer
13.1
± 8.2
Change From Baseline Body Appreciation at 1 MonthSecondary· Baseline (T1) and 1 month post-intervention (T2)
Body Appreciation Scale. 13 items. Range 13-65. Higher score indicates more positive body appreciation.
T1 Mean, SD
Group
Value
95% CI
Mindful After Cancer
3.2
± 0.7
T2 Mean, SD
Group
Value
95% CI
Mindful After Cancer
3.6
± 0.7
Change From Baseline Anxiety at 1 MonthSecondary· Baseline (T1) and 1 month post-intervention (T2)
PROMIS Emotional Distress Anxiety Short Form 6a. 6 items. Range 6-30. Higher score indicates greater anxiety symptoms.
T1 Mean, SD
Group
Value
95% CI
Mindful After Cancer
15.0
± 5.4
T2 Mean, SD
Group
Value
95% CI
Mindful After Cancer
12.9
± 4.4
Change From Baseline Depression at 1 MonthSecondary· Baseline (T1) and 1 month post-intervention (T2)
Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D). 20 items. Range 0-60. Higher score indicates greater depressive symptoms
T1 Mean, SD
Group
Value
95% CI
Mindful After Cancer
16.3
± 9.0
T2 Mean, SD
Group
Value
95% CI
Mindful After Cancer
13.9
± 11.3
Change in Facets of Baseline Mindfulness at 1 MonthSecondary· Baseline (T1) and 1 month post-intervention (T2)
Five-Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ-15). 15 items with 5 sub-scales: Observe, Describe; Act with Awareness; Non-Judgement, Non-Reactivity. Sub-scale score range 3-15. Higher score indicates greater mindfulness.
Observe subscale T1 Mean, SD
Group
Value
95% CI
Mindful After Cancer
10.8
± 2.1
Observe subscale T2 Mean, SD
Group
Value
95% CI
Mindful After Cancer
9.6
± 0.9
Acting with Awareness subscale T1 Mean, SD
Group
Value
95% CI
Mindful After Cancer
9.3
± 2.0
Acting with Awareness subscale T2 Mean, SD
Group
Value
95% CI
Mindful After Cancer
10.8
± 2.2
Non-reactivity subscale T1 Mean, SD
Group
Value
95% CI
Mindful After Cancer
9.7
± 2.4
Non-reactivity subscale T2 Mean, SD
Group
Value
95% CI
Mindful After Cancer
8.9
± 1.0
Non-judging subscale T1 Mean, SD
Group
Value
95% CI
Mindful After Cancer
10.7
± 2.4
Non-judging subscale T2 Mean, SD
Group
Value
95% CI
Mindful After Cancer
8.8
± 1.4
Sponsor's own description
The objectives of this study are to: 1) adapt a mindfulness-based therapy program designed to help women manage their sexual and body image concerns after cancer (Mindful After Cancer, MAC) to a videoconference format and 2) assess the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effects of the program among breast and gynecologic cancer survivors.
Publications & conference data
No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial. Completed trials usually publish results within 12-18 months.
NCT06148038 — CBD for Breast Cancer Primary Tumors
· Phase 1
· recruiting
NCT07405801 — A Phase II Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Inavolisib Plus Ribociclib Plus Fulvestrant Versus Placebo Plus R
· Phase 2
· recruiting
NCT07285993 — Detection and Outcomes in Metastatic Invasive Lobular Breast Cancer Through Novel F-18 FAP PET
· Phase 2
· recruiting
NCT07510698 — Same-Day Awake Mastectomy With Immediate Breast Reconstruction for Patients With Breast Cancer
· NA
· recruiting
NCT06768931 — Biolosion Combined Standard Neoadjuvant Therapy to Treat Triple-negative Breast Cancer
· Phase 2
· recruiting
Other Oregon State University trials
Trials by the same sponsor.
NCT06384742 — Shift Worker Intervention for Sleep Health
· NA
· recruiting
NCT05965609 — Optimizing Sleep Health in Nurses
· NA
· completed
NCT05950672 — Development and Evaluation CAT and Youth
· NA
· completed
NCT05482464 — Effect of Daily Consumption of Glycomacropeptide on Gut Microbiome and Blood Functional Proteome of Subjects With Irrita
· NA
· completed
NCT06915129 — The Effect of Galactooligosaccharides (GOS) on the Gut Microbiota of Lactose Intolerance Individuals
· NA
· completed
Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by Oregon State University
Last refreshed: 25 June 2025
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT04559854.