Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT04543786

Neuromodulation in Lower Limb Amputees

Terminated NA Results posted Last updated 24 July 2023
What this trial tests

NA trial testing Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation in Amputation in 3 participants. Terminated before completion.

Timeline
7 March 2022
Primary endpoint
29 June 2022
29 June 2022

Quick facts

Lead sponsorUniversity of Pittsburgh
PhaseNA
StatusTerminated
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationna
Designsingle group
Maskingnone
Primary purposebasic science
Enrollment3
Start date7 March 2022
Primary completion29 June 2022
Estimated completion29 June 2022
Sites2 locations across United States

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

University of Pittsburgh

Who can join

Adults 21 to 70, any sex, with Amputation or Phantom Limb Pain. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.

Mean H-reflex Threshold Primary · Day 2

Reflex threshold: stimulation amplitude required to evoke reflex response. The presence of H-reflexes are expected in uninjured individuals.

GroupValue95% CI
Transcutaneous Spinal Cord StimulationNA± NA
Mean H-reflex Threshold Primary · Day 3

Reflex threshold: stimulation amplitude required to evoke reflex response. The presence of H-reflexes are expected in uninjured individuals.

GroupValue95% CI
Transcutaneous Spinal Cord StimulationNA± NA
Mean H-reflex Threshold Primary · Day 4

Reflex threshold: stimulation amplitude required to evoke reflex response. The presence of H-reflexes are expected in uninjured individuals.

GroupValue95% CI
Transcutaneous Spinal Cord StimulationNA± NA
Mean H-reflex Threshold Primary · Day 5

Reflex threshold: stimulation amplitude required to evoke reflex response. The presence of H-reflexes are expected in uninjured individuals.

GroupValue95% CI
Transcutaneous Spinal Cord StimulationNA± NA
Mean PRM Reflex Threshold Primary · Day 2

Reflex threshold: stimulation amplitude required to evoke reflex response. Thresholds in uninjured people have been reported to be approximately 30 mA.

GroupValue95% CI
Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation56.7± 4.9
Mean PRM Reflex Threshold Primary · Day 3

Reflex threshold: stimulation amplitude required to evoke reflex response. Thresholds in uninjured people have been reported to be approximately 30 mA.

GroupValue95% CI
Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation55.8± 5.9
Mean PRM Reflex Threshold Primary · Day 4

Reflex threshold: stimulation amplitude required to evoke reflex response. Thresholds in uninjured people have been reported to be approximately 30 mA.

GroupValue95% CI
Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation56.2± 7.6
Mean PRM Reflex Threshold Primary · Day 5

Reflex threshold: stimulation amplitude required to evoke reflex response. Thresholds in uninjured people have been reported to be approximately 30 mA.

GroupValue95% CI
Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation38.6± 12.2
Phantom Limb Pain Score Secondary · Day 5

McGill Pain Questionnaire: minimum = 0, maximum = 78, the higher the pain score the greater the pain

GroupValue95% CI
Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation18.3± 6.8
Pain Pressure Threshold Secondary · Day 5

Pain Pressure Threshold Test using an algometer: minimum force that induces pain, minimum = 0 N, maximum = 444.8 N, a lower threshold indicates hypersensitivity

GroupValue95% CI
Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation50.67± 26.07
Pain Score Secondary · Day 2

Visual analog scale: minimum = 0, maximum = 10, the higher the score the greater the pain

GroupValue95% CI
Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation4.7± 1.5
Pain Score Secondary · Day 3

Visual analog scale: minimum = 0, maximum = 10, the higher the score the greater the pain

GroupValue95% CI
Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation3.7± 3.2

Sponsor's own description

The goal of this study is to investigate the role of transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation on spinal cord excitability in lower limb amputees. In this study, the investigators will quantify the spinal cord excitability determined by 1) reflexes and electromyography, and 2) phantom limb pain using self-reported pain assessments. The investigators will assess these measures of spinal excitability in lower limb amputees before and after transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation.

Publications & conference data

1 peer-reviewed publication reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):

  1. A preliminary study exploring the effects of transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation on spinal excitability and phantom limb pain in people with a transtibial amputation.
    Dalrymple AN, Fisher LE, Weber DJ. · · 2024 · cited 8× · PMID 39094627 · DOI 10.1088/1741-2552/ad6a8d

Verify or expand the search:

Other trials of Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation

Trials testing the same drug.

Other recruiting trials for Amputation

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other University of Pittsburgh trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT04543786.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing