Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT04528069

Clinical Investigation of the Visual Outcomes and Safety of a Trifocal Toric IOL in an Asian Population

Completed NA Results posted Last updated 30 December 2022
What this trial tests

NA trial testing ACRYSOF® IQ PanOptix® Toric Trifocal IOL in Aphakia in 58 participants. Completed in 17 December 2021.

Timeline
16 November 2020
Primary endpoint
17 December 2021
17 December 2021

Quick facts

Lead sponsorAlcon Research
PhaseNA
StatusCompleted
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationna
Designsingle group
Maskingnone
Primary purposetreatment
Enrollment58
Start date16 November 2020
Primary completion17 December 2021
Estimated completion17 December 2021
Sites4 locations across Australia

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Alcon Research — full company profile →

Who can join

20 and older, any sex, with Aphakia or Corneal Astigmatism. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.

Mean Monocular Residual Manifest Cylinder for All Operative Eyes for All IOL Models Combined Primary · Month 3 postoperative, Month 6 postoperative

Manifest cylinder is the amount of added correction needed to compensate for any astigmatism that may be present. A manifest refraction (manual vision test) was conducted using letter charts and a phoropter. Residual manifest cylinder was measured in diopters and reported in plus cylinder form, with a smaller number indicating a lesser amount of added correction. Eyes were assessed individually and combined for the analysis. No formal statistical hypothesis testing was prespecified for this outcome measure.

Month 3 postoperative
GroupValue95% CI
All Eyes0.219± 0.2388
Month 6 postoperative
GroupValue95% CI
All Eyes0.198± 0.2392
Percentage of Eyes With IOL Rotation Less Than 10 Degrees Primary · Month 3 postoperative, Month 6 postoperative

IOL rotation was defined as the difference in IOL axis of orientation from Day 1 postoperative. IOL rotation was assessed by the investigator using a slit lamp and was recorded in degrees, with a smaller number indicating less rotation. Eyes were assessed individually and combined for the analysis. No formal statistical hypothesis testing was prespecified for this outcome measure.

Month 3 postoperative
GroupValue95% CI
All Eyes100
Month 6 postoperative
GroupValue95% CI
All Eyes100
Mean Binocular Best Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BCDVA) Primary · Month 3 postoperative, Month 6 postoperative

Visual acuity (VA) was assessed at a distance of 4 meters with refractive correction in place using a visual acuity chart. VA was measured in logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR), with 0.0 logMAR corresponding to 20/20 Snellen visual acuity, or normal distance eyesight. Eyes were assessed binocularly (eyes together). A lower value denotes better visual acuity. No formal statistical hypothesis testing was prespecified for this outcome measure.

Month 3 postoperative
GroupValue95% CI
PanOptix Toric Trifocal IOL0.043± 0.0881
Month 6 postoperative
GroupValue95% CI
PanOptix Toric Trifocal IOL0.022± 0.0810
Mean Binocular Distance Corrected Intermediate Visual Acuity (DCIVA) Primary · Month 3 postoperative, Month 6 postoperative

Visual acuity (VA) was assessed at a distance of 60 meters with distance correction (plus or minus power) in place. VA was measured in logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR), with 0.0 logMAR corresponding to 20/20 Snellen visual acuity, or normal distance eyesight. Eyes were assessed binocularly (eyes together). A lower value denotes better visual acuity. No formal statistical hypothesis testing was prespecified for this outcome measure.

Month 3 postoperative
GroupValue95% CI
PanOptix Toric Trifocal IOL0.075± 0.1068
Month 6 postoperative
GroupValue95% CI
PanOptix Toric Trifocal IOL0.089± 0.1074
Mean Binocular Distance Corrected Near Visual Acuity (DCNVA) Primary · Month 3 postoperative, Month 6 postoperative

Visual acuity (VA) was assessed at a distance of 40 centimeters with distance correction (plus or minus power) in place using a visual acuity chart. VA was measured in logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR), with 0.0 logMAR corresponding to 20/20 Snellen visual acuity, or normal distance eyesight. Eyes were assessed binocularly (eyes together). A lower value denotes better visual acuity. No formal statistical hypothesis testing was prespecified for this outcome measure.

Month 3 postoperative
GroupValue95% CI
PanOptix Toric Trifocal IOL0.161± 0.0924
Month 6 postoperative
GroupValue95% CI
PanOptix Toric Trifocal IOL0.139± 0.0886
Percentage of Eyes With Secondary Surgical Interventions (SSIs), by Category Primary · Up to Month 6 postoperative

A secondary surgical intervention (SSI) was defined as a surgical procedure occurring after primary implantation of the IOL. SSIs are reported categorically as SSIs related to the IOL and due to optical properties, SSIs related to the IOL and not due to optical properties, and SSIs unrelated to the IOL.

SSIs Related to IOL - Due to Optical Properties
GroupValue95% CI
PanOptix Toric Trifocal IOL - First Eye0.0
PanOptix Toric Trifocal IOL - Second Eye0.0
PanOptix Toric Trifocal IOL - All Eyes0.0
SSIs Related to the IOL - Not Due to Optical Properties
GroupValue95% CI
PanOptix Toric Trifocal IOL - First Eye0.0
PanOptix Toric Trifocal IOL - Second Eye0.0
PanOptix Toric Trifocal IOL - All Eyes0.0
SSIs Unrelated to the IOL
GroupValue95% CI
PanOptix Toric Trifocal IOL - First Eye1.9
PanOptix Toric Trifocal IOL - Second Eye2.0
PanOptix Toric Trifocal IOL - All Eyes1.9
Percentage of Subjects With a Severe Visual Disturbance Primary · Preoperative, Month 3 postoperative, Month 6 postoperative

The Questionnaire for Visual Disturbances (QUVID) is a patient-reported outcomes questionnaire that collects responses from the subject about 7 vision-related experiences. For each experience, the subject was asked if he/she had experienced it during the past 7 days. Subjects responding "Yes" were then asked to rate how severe their worst experience was during the past 7 days. Subjects responded on a 5-point scale: 0=None; 1=A little; 2=Mild; 3=Moderate; 4=Severe. Subjects responding "No" were automatically imputed as reporting, "0=None." Percentage was calculated as number of subjects with re

Starbursts - Severe
GroupValue95% CI
PanOptix Toric Trifocal IOL - Preoperative11.84.4 – 23.9
PanOptix Toric Trifocal IOL - Month 317.07.6 – 30.8
PanOptix Toric Trifocal IOL - Month 614.96.2 – 28.3
Halos - Severe
GroupValue95% CI
PanOptix Toric Trifocal IOL - Preoperative9.83.3 – 21.4
PanOptix Toric Trifocal IOL - Month 36.31.3 – 17.2
PanOptix Toric Trifocal IOL - Month 60.00.0 – 7.5
Glare - Severe
GroupValue95% CI
PanOptix Toric Trifocal IOL - Preoperative19.69.8 – 33.1
PanOptix Toric Trifocal IOL - Month 38.32.3 – 20.0
PanOptix Toric Trifocal IOL - Month 66.51.4 – 17.9
Hazy Vision - Severe
GroupValue95% CI
PanOptix Toric Trifocal IOL - Preoperative9.83.3 – 21.4
PanOptix Toric Trifocal IOL - Month 30.00.0 – 7.4
PanOptix Toric Trifocal IOL - Month 60.00.0 – 7.5
Blurred Vision - Severe
GroupValue95% CI
PanOptix Toric Trifocal IOL - Preoperative18.08.6 – 31.2
PanOptix Toric Trifocal IOL - Month 30.00.0 – 7.4
PanOptix Toric Trifocal IOL - Month 60.00.0 – 7.5
Double Vision - Severe
GroupValue95% CI
PanOptix Toric Trifocal IOL - Preoperative2.00.0 – 10.4
PanOptix Toric Trifocal IOL - Month 30.00.0 – 7.4
PanOptix Toric Trifocal IOL - Month 60.00.0 – 7.5
Dark Area - Severe
GroupValue95% CI
PanOptix Toric Trifocal IOL - Preoperative2.00.0 – 10.4
PanOptix Toric Trifocal IOL - Month 30.00.0 – 7.4
PanOptix Toric Trifocal IOL - Month 60.00.0 – 7.5
Percentage of Subjects With a Most Bothersome Visual Disturbance (QUVID) Primary · Preoperative, Month 3 postoperative, Month 6 postoperative

QUVID is a patient-reported outcomes questionnaire that collects responses from the subject about 7 vision-related experiences. For each experience, the subject was asked if he/she had experienced it during the past 7 days. Subjects responding "Yes" were then asked to rate how severe their worst experience was with the vision-related experience in the past 7 days. Subjects responded on a 5-point scale: 0=Not bothered at all; 1=Bothered a little bit; 2=Bothered somewhat; 3=Bothered quite a bit; 4=Bothered very much. Subjects responding "No" were automatically imputed as reporting, "0=Not bother

Starbursts - Bothered very much
GroupValue95% CI
PanOptix Toric Trifocal IOL - Preoperative9.83.3 – 21.4
PanOptix Toric Trifocal IOL - Month 34.20.5 – 14.3
PanOptix Toric Trifocal IOL - Month 62.10.1 – 11.3
Halos - Bothered very much
GroupValue95% CI
PanOptix Toric Trifocal IOL - Preoperative7.82.2 – 18.9
PanOptix Toric Trifocal IOL - Month 30.00.0 – 7.4
PanOptix Toric Trifocal IOL - Month 62.10.1 – 11.3
Glare - Bothered very much
GroupValue95% CI
PanOptix Toric Trifocal IOL - Preoperative21.611.3 – 35.3
PanOptix Toric Trifocal IOL - Month 36.31.3 – 17.2
PanOptix Toric Trifocal IOL - Month 60.00.0 – 7.5
Hazy Vision - Bothered very much
GroupValue95% CI
PanOptix Toric Trifocal IOL - Preoperative13.75.7 – 26.3
PanOptix Toric Trifocal IOL - Month 30.00.0 – 7.4
PanOptix Toric Trifocal IOL - Month 60.00.0 – 7.5
Blurred Vision - Bothered very much
GroupValue95% CI
PanOptix Toric Trifocal IOL - Preoperative20.010.0 – 33.7
PanOptix Toric Trifocal IOL - Month 32.10.1 – 11.1
PanOptix Toric Trifocal IOL - Month 62.10.1 – 11.3
Double Vision - Bothered very much
GroupValue95% CI
PanOptix Toric Trifocal IOL - Preoperative5.91.2 – 16.2
PanOptix Toric Trifocal IOL - Month 30.00.0 – 7.4
PanOptix Toric Trifocal IOL - Month 60.00.0 – 7.5
Dark Area - Bothered very much
GroupValue95% CI
PanOptix Toric Trifocal IOL - Preoperative3.90.5 – 13.5
PanOptix Toric Trifocal IOL - Month 30.00.0 – 7.4
PanOptix Toric Trifocal IOL - Month 60.00.0 – 7.5
Percentage of Subjects With Ocular Serious Adverse Events Including Serious Adverse Device Effects Primary · Up to Month 6 postoperative

An adverse event (AE) was defined as untoward medical occurrence, unintended disease or injury, or untoward clinical sign (including abnormal laboratory findings) in subjects, users, or other persons, whether or not related to the investigational medical device (test product). AEs were obtained through solicited and spontaneous comments from subjects and through observations by the Investigator. No formal statistical hypothesis testing was prespecified for this outcome measure.

Diabetic retinal oedema
GroupValue95% CI
PanOptix Toric Trifocal IOL - First Eye1.90.5 – 9.89
PanOptix Toric Trifocal IOL - Second Eye0.00.0 – 6.98
Intra-ocular injection
GroupValue95% CI
PanOptix Toric Trifocal IOL - First Eye1.90.5 – 9.89
PanOptix Toric Trifocal IOL - Second Eye0.00.0 – 6.98
Iris adhesions
GroupValue95% CI
PanOptix Toric Trifocal IOL - First Eye0.00.0 – 6.60
PanOptix Toric Trifocal IOL - Second Eye2.00.05 – 10.45
Percentage of Subjects With Nonocular Serious Adverse Events Including Serious Adverse Device Effects Primary · Up to Month 6 postoperative

An adverse event (AE) was defined as untoward medical occurrence, unintended disease or injury, or untoward clinical sign (including abnormal laboratory findings) in subjects, users, or other persons, whether or not related to the investigational medical device (test product). AEs were obtained through solicited and spontaneous comments from subjects and through observations by the Investigator. No formal statistical hypothesis testing was prespecified for this outcome measure.

Coronary arterial stent insertion
GroupValue95% CI
PanOptix Toric Trifocal IOL1.90.05 – 9.89
Coronary artery disease
GroupValue95% CI
PanOptix Toric Trifocal IOL1.90.05 – 9.89

Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Time frame: Adverse events (AEs) were collected from time of consent to Day 180-210 post-treatment/study exit, up to 8 months. AEs were obtained through solicited and spontaneous comments from subjects and through observations by the Investigator.. Reporting threshold: 5%. Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.

Pretreatment
Serious: 0/54 (0%)
Deaths: 0/54
PanOptix Toric First Eye
Serious: 1/54 (2%)
Deaths: 0/54
PanOptix Toric Second Eye
Serious: 1/51 (2%)
Deaths: 0/51
PanOptix Toric Systemic
Serious: 1/54 (2%)
Deaths: 0/54

Serious adverse events (5 terms)

ReactionSystemPretreatmentPanOptix Toric First EyePanOptix Toric Second EyePanOptix Toric Systemic
Coronary artery diseaseCardiac disorders
Diabetic retinal oedemaEye disorders
Iris adhesionsEye disorders
Coronary arterial stent insertionSurgical and medical procedures
Intra-ocular injectionSurgical and medical procedures
Other adverse events (2 terms — click to expand)

ReactionSystemPretreatmentPanOptix Toric First EyePanOptix Toric Second EyePanOptix Toric Systemic
Corneal erosionEye disorders
Dry eyeEye disorders

Most-reported serious reactions: Coronary artery disease, Diabetic retinal oedema, Iris adhesions, Coronary arterial stent insertion, Intra-ocular injection.

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04528069 adverse events section.

Sponsor's own description

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical performance of the ACRYSOF® IQ PanOptix® Toric Trifocal intraocular lens (IOL) when implanted in the eye following cataract removal in an Asian population.

Publications & conference data

No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial. Completed trials usually publish results within 12-18 months.

Verify or expand the search:

Other recruiting trials for Aphakia

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other Alcon Research trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT04528069.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing