Erector Spinae Plane Blocks for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis
CompletedNAResults postedLast updated 27 December 2024
What this trial tests
NA trial testing Bilateral Erector Spinae Plane Block with bupivacaine and dexamethasone in Pain, Postoperative in 24 participants. Completed in 2 December 2022.
Timeline
22 February 2021
Primary endpoint 28 November 2022
2 December 2022
Quick facts
Lead sponsor
Hospital for Special Surgery, New York
Phase
NA
Status
Completed
Study type
INTERVENTIONAL
Allocation
randomized
Design
parallel
Masking
double
Primary purpose
treatment
Enrollment
24
Start date
22 February 2021
Primary completion
28 November 2022
Estimated completion
2 December 2022
Sites
1 location across United States
Drugs / interventions tested
Bilateral Erector Spinae Plane Block with bupivacaine and dexamethasone
No bilateral Erector Spinae Plane Block (no bupivacaine and no dexamethasone)
Adults 10 to 19, any sex, with Pain, Postoperative or Opioid Use. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
Number of Patients Who Receive Bilateral, Pre-incision ESPBPrimary· through study completion, an average of 1 year
number who receive the intervention and complete all assessments
Group
Value
95% CI
ESPB With Bupivacaine and Dexamethasone
9
No ESPB
12
Rate of RecruitmentSecondary· through study completion, an average of 1 year
Number enrolled and allocated to specific group
Group
Value
95% CI
ESPB With Bupivacaine and Dexamethasone
12
No ESPB
12
Blinding AssessmentSecondary· 24 hours after surgery
Based on Bang's Blinding Index. Patients' ability to determine whether or not they received the ESPB. The success of patient blinding in each group will be quantified using the Bang Blinding Index which ranges from -1 to 1. Scores closest to 0 indicate a less likelihood that patients were able to guess which group they were randomized into. A score of 1 or -1 means that patients were able to guess which group they were in or guessed the wrong group, respectively. This value is obtained by asking patients which group they believe they were randomly assigned to.
Group
Value
95% CI
ESPB With Bupivacaine and Dexamethasone
0
-.30 – .30
No ESPB
-0.33
-.63 – -0.04
Number of Participants Unable to Receive ESPB Block.Secondary· Holding area, Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) (hour 0), hour 8, 12, and 24 hours after surgery
Number of participants who were randomized to receive the ESPB block, but were unable to receive the block. The no ESPB group were randomized not to get the ESPB block, leading to 0 instances of missed ESPB block.
Group
Value
95% CI
ESPB With Bupivacaine and Dexamethasone
2
No ESPB
0
AttritionSecondary· through study completion, an average of 1 year
Number of patients who enroll but do not receive the intervention and/or study assessments.
Group
Value
95% CI
ESPB With Bupivacaine and Dexamethasone
3
No ESPB
0
Incidence of Intra- and Postoperative Complications Attributed to ESPBSecondary· During surgery, PACU (hour 0), hour 8, 12, and 24 hours after surgery
Interference with intraoperative neuromonitoring, infection, local anesthetic toxicity, bleeding/hematoma, extremity weakness
Group
Value
95% CI
ESPB With Bupivacaine and Dexamethasone
0
No ESPB
0
Pain Scores at Rest and MovementSecondary· PACU (Post Anesthesia Care Unit, hour 0), hour 8, 12, and 24 hours after surgery, and at hospital discharge (an average of 4 days)
Measured by Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain at rest and with movement (0 being no pain and 10 being as bad as you can imagine). NRS was collected for each participant, Mean and Standard Deviations are found below.
NRS upon PACU Arrival
Group
Value
95% CI
ESPB With Bupivacaine and Dexamethasone
3.64
± 3.93
No ESPB
3.58
± 4.19
NRS at 8 Hours
Group
Value
95% CI
ESPB With Bupivacaine and Dexamethasone
4
± 3.37
No ESPB
2.5
± 1.62
NRS at 12 Hours
Group
Value
95% CI
ESPB With Bupivacaine and Dexamethasone
3.3
± 2.45
No ESPB
3
± 3.36
NRS at rest at 24 hours
Group
Value
95% CI
ESPB With Bupivacaine and Dexamethasone
3.55
± 1.63
No ESPB
2.42
± 2.19
NRS with Movement at 24 Hours
Group
Value
95% CI
ESPB With Bupivacaine and Dexamethasone
5.82
± 2.44
No ESPB
5
± 2.66
NRS at rest at Discharge
Group
Value
95% CI
ESPB With Bupivacaine and Dexamethasone
3.36
± 1.5
No ESPB
3
± 1.95
NRS with movement at Discharge
Group
Value
95% CI
ESPB With Bupivacaine and Dexamethasone
4.09
± 2.07
No ESPB
3.18
± 1.66
Total Opioid ConsumptionSecondary· 0-24 hours after surgery (OME within 24 hrs)
Measured in mean oral morphine equivalents (OME)
Group
Value
95% CI
ESPB With Bupivacaine and Dexamethasone
78.23
± 31.52
No ESPB
53.89
± 27.68
Time to First Opioid UseSecondary· Up to 24 hours after surgery
Time to pressing Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia (IV PCA) and to requesting first oral opioid
Group
Value
95% CI
ESPB With Bupivacaine and Dexamethasone
178
43 – 309
No ESPB
94
57.5 – 246.5
Opioid Related Side EffectsSecondary· 24 hours after surgery
Measured by 10 symptom Opioid Related Symptom Distress Scale (ORSDS). Frequency of each symptom within the cohort was assessed.
Fatigue
Group
Value
95% CI
ESPB With Bupivacaine and Dexamethasone
3
No ESPB
9
Drowsiness
Group
Value
95% CI
ESPB With Bupivacaine and Dexamethasone
6
No ESPB
7
Concentration
Group
Value
95% CI
ESPB With Bupivacaine and Dexamethasone
1
No ESPB
2
Nausea
Group
Value
95% CI
ESPB With Bupivacaine and Dexamethasone
7
No ESPB
10
Dizziness
Group
Value
95% CI
ESPB With Bupivacaine and Dexamethasone
6
No ESPB
8
Constipation
Group
Value
95% CI
ESPB With Bupivacaine and Dexamethasone
0
No ESPB
1
Itching
Group
Value
95% CI
ESPB With Bupivacaine and Dexamethasone
4
No ESPB
2
Urination
Group
Value
95% CI
ESPB With Bupivacaine and Dexamethasone
0
No ESPB
0
Patient/Parent Satisfaction With Pain ManagementSecondary· At hospital discharge (an average of 4 days)
Measured via Likert rating scale (0 being strongly dissatisfied and 10 being strongly satisfied)
Patient
Group
Value
95% CI
ESPB With Bupivacaine and Dexamethasone
10
7 – 10
No ESPB
8
7 – 10
Parent
Group
Value
95% CI
ESPB With Bupivacaine and Dexamethasone
10
9 – 10
No ESPB
9
8 – 10
Sponsor's own description
Pediatric spinal fusion (PSF) surgery is a painful procedure that can treat adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). One technique that can potentially reduce patients' pain levels and need for opioid medication is the ultrasound-guided Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB). The ESP block is a technique that involves injecting an anesthetic medication into the muscles of the lower back on both sides of the spine. Previous studies have shown that ESPB application led to a reduction in opioid use, and there is one pediatric case report of ESPB use in two patients undergoing PSF. However, there is still lack of evidence that the ESPB technique is feasible and effective in the pediatric patient population.
The present study is designed to be the first randomized controlled trial to evaluate the role of ESPB in pediatric spinal fusion surgery and the role of ESPB within an enhanced recovery pathway.
Publications & conference data
No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial. Completed trials usually publish results within 12-18 months.
NCT07512141 — Single Versus Double Drains in the Axillary and Pectoral Regions After Modified Radical Mastectomy
· NA
· recruiting
NCT07354581 — Erector Spinae Plane Block vs Quadro-Iliac Plane Block After Lumbar Instrumentation Surgery
· NA
· recruiting
NCT07239817 — PENG Block + LIA For Endoprosthesis Surgery With Anterior Approach
· NA
· recruiting
NCT06740214 — Analgesic Efficacy of Different Liposomal Bupivacaine Doses in the Adductor Canal Block for Total Knee Arthroplasty
· Phase 3
· recruiting
NCT07057557 — Aloe Vera vs Paraffin Tulle Dressings for Pain Management in Split Thickness Skin Graft Donor Sites
· NA
· recruiting
Other Hospital for Special Surgery, New York trials
Trials by the same sponsor.
NCT07226700 — Suzetrigine in Total Hip Arthroplasty
· Phase 3
· recruiting
Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by Hospital for Special Surgery, New York
Last refreshed: 27 December 2024
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT04500613.