Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT04466332

Comparison of Two ECG Guided PICC Insertion Techniques

Completed NA Last updated 28 September 2022
What this trial tests

NA trial testing LifeCath-CT PICC easy™ (Vygon) in Central Venous Access in 320 participants. Completed in 20 August 2021.

Timeline
1 September 2020
Primary endpoint
1 September 2020
20 August 2021

Quick facts

Lead sponsorUniversity of Lausanne
PhaseNA
StatusCompleted
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designparallel
Maskingnone
Primary purposeother
Enrollment320
Start date1 September 2020
Primary completion1 September 2020
Estimated completion20 August 2021
Sites1 location across Switzerland

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

University of Lausanne

Who can join

18 and older, any sex, with Central Venous Access or Long Term Antibiotics. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Sponsor's own description

The aim of our study is to compare two ECG techniques for guiding Peripherally Inserted Central Venous Cather (PICC) in terms of accuracy of the final position of the catheter tip.

Publications & conference data

1 peer-reviewed publication reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):

  1. Comparison of ECG Saline-Conduction Technique and ECG Wire-Based Technique for Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter Insertion: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Gullo G, Frossard P, Colin A, Qanadli SD. · · 2024 · cited 1× · PMID 38339610 · DOI 10.3390/s24030894

Verify or expand the search:

Other University of Lausanne trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT04466332.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing